- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 29,957
- Reaction score
- 14,683
- Location
- Netherlands
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Joke? Sure, we'll go with that.
Yup, a joke to expose ridiculous nonsense.
Joke? Sure, we'll go with that.
I asked you to clarify what purpose discussing the subject on an anonymous message board would have in alleviating historical abuse by muslim rape gangs and you ran away.
The stupidity of that position is mind-bending. It's a ****ing DISCUSSION board!!! We come here to DISCUSS things. What problem has ANYONE ever solved by being here????
But a criminal courts judge actually validated the disgusting belief that says white girls just aren't worth the same as non-whites girls. Sally Cahill QC ruled that a sex offender should serve a longer sentence because his victims were Asian.
Child molester given longer sentence as victims are Asian - Telegraph
It's no wonder why these white victims of Pakistani pedophiles find very little if any recourse; they've been told they're inferior by everyone from Pakistani predators, to local police, to court judges, to Members of Parliament.
HALLELUJAH and well done, it's only taken you 9 fricken pages to get you to see and answer what I was asking you in post 44. Try and be a bit quicker off the mark next time please, it's been painfully slow getting you to understand the moronic post you made in post 31, page 4. Your reply shows that anyone can eventually be helped to understand the vapidity of their own question.
I'll be around next time you need help understanding why your questions are pointless and vapid.
One criminal court decision does not make policy across the rest of the country. That case was over 4 years ago and if you can show that similar sentences have been carried out showing that asian victims routinely bring about greater sentences for convicted paedophiles or that white victims routinely bring about lower sentences for convicted paedophiles since then - then you have a case.
HALLELUJAH and well done, it's only taken you 9 fricken pages to get you to see and answer what I was asking you in post 44. Try and be a bit quicker off the mark next time please, it's been painfully slow getting you to understand the moronic post you made in post 31, page 4. Your reply shows that anyone can eventually be helped to understand the vapidity of their own question.
I'll be around next time you need help understanding why your questions are pointless and vapid.
One criminal court decision does not make policy across the rest of the country. That case was over 4 years ago and if you can show that similar sentences have been carried out showing that asian victims routinely bring about greater sentences for convicted paedophiles or that white victims routinely bring about lower sentences for convicted paedophiles since then - then you have a case.
Sorry, I didn't realize how little oxygen there must be on your planet. Here's my post:
That's your concern here? Minor girls are being targeted by predators and you're worried about the poster? Give your head a shake.
I have no idea how your being concerned with the wrong thing makes that a silly post. None.
You can't possibly be this daft. Police districts turn white children away when they ask for help escaping Muslim rape fiends, and scour the streets looking for the odd non-Pakistani sex offender to arrest, so as not to offend. Child care centers paid little mind to Pakistani men loitering outside waiting to hit on white girls when they came outside. A Pakistani Member of Parliament Tweeted that white rape victims should shut up for the good of diversity. I've heard all my life that the national socialist's version of Weimar Germany was a myth, yet here we are 100 years later, and Britain is living through the same horrors, minus economic catastrophe.
I've never seen you post on any other threads than where Muslims are being attacked en masse and treated all the same as if they are all one and the same.
The report is a harrowing look at how Greater Manchester Police and other local authorities failed to take appropriate action more than 15 years ago, despite getting details of nearly 100 “persons of interest” who were using takeout restaurants as a base to rape and abuse children in care between the ages of 11 and 17. It describes offenders as operating “in plain sight” and hanging around care homes and foster homes in cars as they preyed upon vulnerable children.
The report details how all the victims were “young white females” while the perpetrators are “almost exclusively Asian adult males, many of whom are associated via the Asian restaurant trade.”
Britain hit by another Asian grooming gang scandal as report exposes child sex abuse in Manchester | Fox News
Everybody's favorite lie. I talk about Islam, and always in terms of Islamic scripture and history. I've stated many times that not all Muslims support terrorism, just that those who do have the Qur'an to quote and the example of Mohamed to cite. So, carry on lying about me. It's what you do.
OK, prove that I am the liar and show in this thread where you previously talk "always in terms of Islamic scripture and history."
I'm talking about my posting history. YOU are the one who made the accusation, so YOU show me where I lump all Muslims together. Good luck with that.
You failed at your own first test. Why am I NOT surprised?
~ If you're desperate enough to have one more final word claim of victory ~
You just did.... badly. You convince nobody. You made a claim, I asked you to prove it and you can't. You have proven yourself an incompetent.