• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Suspicious Swastikas Appear Once Again, as France Adopts Knesset Definition of Antisemitism

Chagos said:
Lo and behold, the stupid tactic of, when challenged to provide evidence one one's dishonest accusations, just repeat them.

Again without evidence.

Some thrown in non-sequiturs always handy.
Click to expand...

I always framed my opinion as an opinion. Until French authorities make an arrest, I'll remain skeptical. A swastika on a grave marker doesn't tell you anything about who put it there, and what their motives were. People today are more cynical these days, and you can't blame them.
 
Alfons said:
But such 'coincidences' are very common in all countries and all times after WWII
Click to expand...

He's not here for a discussion, he's here to call people names if they don't support giving special rights to certain people.
 
truthatallcost said:
I always framed my opinion as an opinion..........~
Click to expand...
nope.

Not here and not in past threads of yours. At least certainly not always as one would have to search high and far to find an IMO of yours.

Your past thread on a supposed pro-rape rallye (already mentioned here) is just an example.
 
truthatallcost said:
He's not here for a discussion, he's here to call people names if they don't support giving special rights to certain people.
Click to expand...
Where you or the poster you quote are concerned, the part about seeing absolutely no merit in discussing lies is certainly true.

Any yeah, I call their authors as I see 'em.
 
Drawdown said:
Well there are anti-Zionist Jews so I would think it would spark some debate.....
Click to expand...

The debate will consist of the anti Zionist Jews fighting off charges of them hating themselves and other Jewish people. The misuse of the term is standard practice. Any detractors of the actions/existence of the Jewish state can ONLY be regarded as hateful by whatever means possible by its supporters........ it's how so many of them operate. You need only go to the Israel/Palestine forum here to see the misuse of the term so as to shut down debate/smear other posters
 
oneworld2 said:
The debate will consist of the anti Zionist Jews fighting off charges of them hating themselves and other Jewish people. The misuse of the term is standard practice. Any detractors of the actions/existence of the Jewish state can ONLY be regarded as hateful by whatever means possible by its supporters........ it's how so many of them operate. You need only go to the Israel/Palestine forum here to see the misuse of the term so as to shut down debate/smear other posters
Click to expand...

I am well aware. The ironic part though is that the Anti-Zionist Jews are the ones who oppose Israel based on religious doctrine.
 
Drawdown said:
I am well aware. The ironic part though is that the Anti-Zionist Jews are the ones who oppose Israel based on religious doctrine.
Click to expand...

The subject is full of irony. Recall many Zionists that emigrated to Palestine prior to the state of Israel were not believers at all but saw the currency in religious theme especially with gaining support amongst Christian Zionists who themselves only saw Israel as the event to bring the second coming which would see , in their eyes , a demand by God that they convert to Christianity or suffer his wrath.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom