• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Brexit: Scottish judges rule Parliament suspension is unlawful

Fishking said:
Did anything you say contradict what I stated? No. Care to try?
Click to expand...

No thanks. I've done that before. I'll let someone else take the bait. But I highly doubt anyone here will do so. You're already outed.
 
Rogue Valley said:
No thanks. I've done that before. I'll let someone else take the bait. But I highly doubt anyone here will do so. You're already outed.
Click to expand...

"All ready outed" as what? Someone who stomps your crappy warmonger posts routinely? What a pathetic response, btw. I'm not shocked because there is no valid response to the question I posed for you, because I'm right, so you're now just trying to save face.

No...not letting you off the hook. How embarrassing for you.
 
The Supreme Court (highest in UK) has this minute declared BoJo's advice to the Queen to prorogue parliament WAS UNLAWFUL and that the prorogation of parliament is, as such, not in effect.

The court's decision was UNANIMOUS.
 
Chagos said:
The Supreme Court (highest in UK) has this minute declared BoJo's advice to the Queen to prorogue parliament WAS UNLAWFUL and that the prorogation of parliament is, as such, not in effect.

The court's decision was UNANIMOUS.
Click to expand...

I presume the Government will be appealing to the European Court of Justice.
 
Chagos said:
The Supreme Court (highest in UK) has this minute declared BoJo's advice to the Queen to prorogue parliament WAS UNLAWFUL and that the prorogation of parliament is, as such, not in effect.

The court's decision was UNANIMOUS.
Click to expand...

Chagos et. al.:

Wow. This is unprecedented in British constitutional history. My gut says it may also be a judicial coup d'etat against the parliamentary system by handing control of parliament to the speakers of both houses. I will wait to read the court's full decision but September 2019 may be as momentous as 1688 now. I'm astonished that the UK Supreme Court would weigh in on what is an essentially a political matter. But I also understand that the unity of the Union is at stake and no doubt the 11 justices felt that sitting on the fence was not an option. So my comment boils down to the rather useless statement, "Wow, just wow!".

A bewildered cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
Fishking said:
" have to brexit hard...peoples vote... blablabla
Click to expand...

I don´t give a damn what kind of rubbish you write, I find it much more interesting why.

Another right leaning "America great" conservative with no clue of Europe in general has a big agenda on Brexit...
Wishing a country to be destroyed only because it fits in the own political agenda is beneath the floor in my world...
 
Evilroddy said:
Chagos et. al.:

Wow. This is unprecedented in British constitutional history. My gut says it may also be a judicial coup d'etat against the parliamentary system by handing control of parliament to the speakers of both houses. I will wait to read the court's full decision but September 2019 may be as momentous as 1688 now. I'm astonished that the UK Supreme Court would weigh in on what is an essentially a political matter. But I also understand that the unity of the Union is at stake and no doubt the 11 justices felt that sitting on the fence was not an option. So my comment boils down to the rather useless statement, "Wow, just wow!".

A bewildered cheers.
Evilroddy.
Click to expand...
You are, with all due respect, misreading the ruling altogether.

The Court ruled upon the protection of parliament's sovereignty and in its ruling effected just that. That issue is not primarily a political matter but one of law. With the Court upholding precisely that.

That the judges considered the unity of the UK to be at stake is pure speculation, as much as that, during the days of their deliberations, they were eating bad breakfasts would be.:2razz:
 
Parliament will resume (THAT word is important in view of the ruling) at 11.30 h UK time tomorrow.

Where questions to the PM (the usual routine on a Wednesday) will obviously not be happening on account of BoJo being in N.Y., everything else is "go" as speaker John Bercow has stated today.

That would, by all signs, include roasting the Liar and Criminal in Chief over the coals even in his absence.
 
this may be the shortest PM term in British history.
 
Meanwhile the lying Shyster-in-Chief is expected to be back in London tomorrow by 11:00 hrs (to attend parliament????),while No. 10 has stated that he won't resign.

Well, yeah sure.

Apart from his lying self not being possessed of the character that would allow even contemplating such a move, the ERG "Spartans" are not likely to let him.

He's meanwhile stated that "as the law stands" the UK will be leaving the EU on the 31-Oct and in this is lying as much as always. Because "as the law stands", that move is not allowed unless a deal is secured and passed thru parliament prior to that date.
 
The irony is that the UK supreme Court was only established in 2009 and in large part due anti EU propoganda and BS...

Sent from my JSN-L21 using Tapatalk
 
Boy my Brexit friends are going absolutely bonkers at the moment.

Sent from my JSN-L21 using Tapatalk
 
PeteEU said:
Boy my Brexit friends are going absolutely bonkers at the moment.

Sent from my JSN-L21 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Are they screaming over democracy having been thwarted, the way they're screeching over this way?:mrgreen:
 
Gina Miller 2 - UK Govt 0

The real shame here though is that an ordinary person whose husband isn't a multimillionaire would not have been able to bring such a case. Or even two such cases.

Regarding the comments about screeching... you do NOT want to know what the alt-righties in our country have to say about a dark skinned woman who has had the temerity to stand up against the holy cause of "Brexit."
 
Infinite Chaos said:
Gina Miller 2 - UK Govt 0

The real shame here though is that an ordinary person whose husband isn't a multimillionaire would not have been able to bring such a case. Or even two such cases.

Regarding the comments about screeching... you do NOT want to know what the alt-righties in our country have to say about a dark skinned woman who has had the temerity to stand up against the holy cause of "Brexit."
Click to expand...
Well, as a heads-up, I (moi) don't even have to go to the UK for that. But I'm probably in a better place in that such specimen are few and far between down here. The screeching I brought up did not (idiotic as it was in content and substance) contain any racist element, but for one person's exception.
 
Chagos said:
Are they screaming over democracy having been thwarted, the way they're screeching over this way?:mrgreen:
Click to expand...

Calling Tory appointed judges for traitors and paid by the EU. Calling for the Knights Templar to rise and defend the British Empire.. and all that crap. Attack Corbyn and others by calling them anti-semitic, while praising Neo Nazi backers.. and half of them protesting are actually Jews.. having an 80 year old Jew spewing the same **** as Hitler did is kinda.. wtf?
 
PeteEU said:
Calling Tory appointed judges for traitors and paid by the EU. Calling for the Knights Templar to rise and defend the British Empire.. and all that crap. Attack Corbyn and others by calling them anti-semitic, while praising Neo Nazi backers.. and half of them protesting are actually Jews.. having an 80 year old Jew spewing the same **** as Hitler did is kinda.. wtf?
Click to expand...
Ever thought of moving house?

You know that West of Malaga the guiris are all borderline demented.:mrgreen:
 
PeteEU said:
Calling Tory appointed judges for traitors and paid by the EU. Calling for the Knights Templar to rise and defend the British Empire.. ~
Click to expand...

I question my country's education system when I read these statements.
 
Watched an interview from Stoke on Trent tonight - one local news person, a Remain business person and a Leaver. 69% apparently voted Leave in 2016 so a strongly exit minded region.
Cutting a long preamble short - the Leave supporter just wants Boris to "get on with it, we've done it before and we'll do it again. We'll be fine."

Just what have we done before though?
 
Infinite Chaos said:
Watched an interview from Stoke on Trent tonight - one local news person, a Remain business person and a Leaver. 69% apparently voted Leave in 2016 so a strongly exit minded region.
Cutting a long preamble short - the Leave supporter just wants Boris to "get on with it, we've done it before and we'll do it again. We'll be fine."

Just what have we done before though?
Click to expand...
It is the classic response from leavers.

Most think of Empire and a strong pre war UK and yet forget the hardships and decline after WW2.

No leaver remember the strikes, shortages and industrial decline that plagued the UK in the 1960s and 1970s. And no one certainly would admit that the UK was basically bankrupt in the early 1970s.

Sent from my JSN-L21 using Tapatalk
 
Infinite Chaos said:
Gina Miller 2 - UK Govt 0

The real shame here though is that an ordinary person whose husband isn't a multimillionaire would not have been able to bring such a case. Or even two such cases..................~
Click to expand...
and there we have it, filthy rich remainers being able to stage a judiciary coup against democracy simply on account of being filthy rich. And, seeing how they have the money to afford better lawyers than the gubmint, swaying the judges to their side.

If, that is, they don't bribe them outright.

Heard and seen tonight on Sky News International in what they call Press Preview and vomited by some mindless twit whose name I didn't bother registering, from some opinion outlet that I didn't bother remembering either.

For comic relief I sometimes watch The Pledge on that channel. Simply because I have no other Brit channel apart from BBC World.

In said program I especially love Molly Malone being on the panel (yeah, yeah, I know her first name isn't Molly). The walking epitome of the adage "it doesn't suffice to be totally without a clue, you also have to be completely unable to express it".

Another one on there is called Ferrari but looks like an old Austin A 30 that's been rescued from a pile-up. That alone has me laughing before the guy even opens his mouth.

To be fair, BoJo's sister is on there sometimes and raises the overall IQ considerably, while Afua Hirsch is truly hot:lol:
 
Infinite Chaos said:
Watched an interview from Stoke on Trent tonight - one local news person, a Remain business person and a Leaver. 69% apparently voted Leave in 2016 so a strongly exit minded region.
Cutting a long preamble short - the Leave supporter just wants Boris to "get on with it, we've done it before and we'll do it again. We'll be fine."

Just what have we done before though?
Click to expand...
You do know that mantras are meditative and thus require no meaning in content?

Yeah, saw the same thing or something similar. The lad they interviewed first spoke something that sounded remotely like English but definitely was not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom