• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tehran fumes as Britain seizes Iranian oil tanker over Syria sanctions

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,343
Reaction score
82,728
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Reuters - Tehran fumes as Britain seizes Iranian oil tanker over Syria sanctions

Iranian ship was boarded by marines in contested waters off coast of Gibraltar

resize

British warship seizes Iranian oil tanker Grace 1 near Gibraltar.

7/4/19
LONDON/DUBAI - British Royal Marines seized a giant Iranian oil tanker in Gibraltar on Thursday for trying to take oil to Syria in violation of EU sanctions, a dramatic step that drew Tehran’s fury and could escalate its confrontation with the West. The Grace 1 tanker was impounded in the British territory on the southern tip of Spain after sailing around Africa, the long route from the Middle East to the mouth of the Mediterranean. Iran’s Foreign Ministry summoned the British ambassador to voice “its very strong objection to the illegal and unacceptable seizure” of its ship. The diplomatic gesture lifted any doubt over Iran’s ownership of the vessel, which flies a Panama flag and is listed as managed by a company in Singapore. Panama’s Maritime Authority said on Thursday that Grace 1 was no longer listed in Panama’s international boat registry as of May 29. Shipping data reviewed by Reuters suggests the tanker was carrying Iranian oil loaded off the coast of Iran, although its documents say the oil is from neighboring Iraq. While Europe has banned oil shipments to Syria since 2011, it had never seized a tanker at sea. Unlike the United States, Europe does not have broad sanctions against Iran.

Authorities in Gibraltar made no reference to the source of the oil or the ownership of the ship when they seized it. But Iran’s acknowledgment that it owned the ship, and the likelihood that its cargo was also Iranian, drew a link between the incident and a new U.S. effort to halt all global sales of Iranian crude. Iran describes that as an illegal “economic war.” The Gibraltar government said it had reasonable grounds to believe that the Grace 1 was carrying crude oil to the Baniyas refinery in Syria. “That refinery is the property of an entity that is subject to European Union sanctions against Syria,” Gibraltar Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said. “With my consent, our port and law enforcement agencies sought the assistance of the Royal Marines in carrying out this operation.” A spokesman for British Prime Minister Theresa May welcomed Gibraltar’s move. Homayoun Falakshahi, senior analyst at London-based energy data firm Kpler, told Reuters the ship had loaded Iranian crude in mid-April from Iran’s export port of Kharg Island. A maritime intelligence source said the ship may have made the journey around Africa to avoid the Suez Canal, where such a large super-tanker would have had to unload its cargo and refill after passing through, exposing it to potential seizure.

Well done. Oil intended for the Assad regime and his proxy forces (Russia/Iran) in Syria. Spain has complained that the tanker was seized in Spanish waters.

Related: BBC - Iranian official threatens to seize British oil tanker

Guardian - Spain to lodge complaint over British seizure of oil tanker
 
The British are stupid... Why the hell do it there of all places.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
 
The British are stupid... Why the hell do it there of all places.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk

Where's a better place than Gibraltar? In open water? According to the article the ship was taken at the request of the Chief Minister of Gibraltar.
 
The conservative sector of British government needs to settle its differences with Spain and the rest of the EU a-s-a-p, lest these divisions get seized upon by its enemies to divide the two further. The U.S. has already nationalistically pulled out of the nuke deal, Paris accords and others, and if Britain goes due to the conservatives pissing off the Europeans - Iran wins...
 
Where's a better place than Gibraltar? In open water? According to the article the ship was taken at the request of the Chief Minister of Gibraltar.
Closer to the destination... And not in disputed waters..

And the Chief Minister can't request ****.. It was 10 Downing Street. Gibraltar has zero to do with foreign policy or actions and does not even control its own borders.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
 
Closer to the destination... And not in disputed waters..

And the Chief Minister can't request ****.. It was 10 Downing Street. Gibraltar has zero to do with foreign policy or actions and does not even control its own borders.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk

Gibraltar is the closest thing to British water on the route the ship took. Anywhere else is not just disputed, it's sovereign.
And yeah, Gibraltar is weak and disputed but they not only can, they did request the Royal Marines. From the report...
"Gibraltar Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said. “With my consent, our port and law enforcement agencies sought the assistance of the Royal Marines in carrying out this operation.”
I don't say the operation should or shouldn't have been undertaken, I just say that if it was going to happen Gibraltar was the best place for it.
 
If nothing else, this is proof that Trump is not acting alone.
 
Gibraltar is the closest thing to British water on the route the ship took. Anywhere else is not just disputed, it's sovereign.
And yeah, Gibraltar is weak and disputed but they not only can, they did request the Royal Marines. From the report...
"Gibraltar Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said. “With my consent, our port and law enforcement agencies sought the assistance of the Royal Marines in carrying out this operation.”
I don't say the operation should or shouldn't have been undertaken, I just say that if it was going to happen Gibraltar was the best place for it.

Well said.
 
Gibraltar is the closest thing to British water on the route the ship took. Anywhere else is not just disputed, it's sovereign.
And yeah, Gibraltar is weak and disputed but they not only can, they did request the Royal Marines. From the report...
"Gibraltar Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said. “With my consent, our port and law enforcement agencies sought the assistance of the Royal Marines in carrying out this operation.”
I don't say the operation should or shouldn't have been undertaken, I just say that if it was going to happen Gibraltar was the best place for it.
Again bull****.

UK has two sovereign military bases right next to Syria on Cyprus.

And I don't care what that moron said in Gibraltar, he does not have that authority to ask for any assistance to board a ship in disputed waters based on sanctions 1000+ km away. Gibraltar is a colony and all its foreign and military affairs is run from London. He was ordered to so called request assistance because the British government needs a scapegoat.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
 
Bravo for Britain.

I love to see Iran "fume."

Just read that Iran is threatening to seize a British tanker in retaliation.


If it does, I hope that there is a Margaret Thatcher kind of British leader who will teach Iran a lesson that it will never forget.
 
The move seems to be an attempt by Britain and America to embarrass the EU over its past practice of not enforcing its sanctions against Syria while simultaneously trying to drive a wider wedge between Europe and Iran at the same time.

By what right did the Royal Marines seize the ship in an international waterway? If Britain can close the Straits of Gibraltar to Iran, cannot Iran close off the Straits or Hormus to UK ships?

Politics and asymmetrical legal manoeuvres backed up by force as per usual. The Iranians should seize a UK owned ship for the sake of inverse symmetry.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
By what right did the Royal Marines seize the ship in an international waterway?

It is unknown [by me] if the Grace 1 was sailing in international waters. It seems the ship was seized in UK/Spanish waters.

Syria is under oil import/export sanctions by the US, UK, and the EU. Iran is under US oil import/export sanctions.
 
It is unknown [by me] if the Grace 1 was sailing in international waters. It seems the ship was seized in UK/Spanish waters.

Syria is under oil import/export sanctions by the US, UK, and the EU. Iran is under US oil import/export sanctions.
It seems that the Brits acted on a request from the Americans according to the Spanish, which does not help the situation.

And again, seizing it so far from Syria and in contested waters is idiotic. It could be going anywhere and now we will never know..

It looks more and more like another attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the US and we both know who that benefits and why the US would ask the UK to do the dirty work...work that the US could easily do themselves.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
 
Closer to the destination... And not in disputed waters..

And the Chief Minister can't request ****.. It was 10 Downing Street. Gibraltar has zero to do with foreign policy or actions and does not even control its own borders.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
You are pissing yourself over an interpreted technicality...do you agree that the UK SHOULD have seized an Iranian vessel flying a fraudulent flag loaded with oil, destined for Syria in opposition to the imposed embargo?
 
You are pissing yourself over an interpreted technicality...do you agree that the UK SHOULD have seized an Iranian vessel flying a fraudulent flag loaded with oil, destined for Syria in opposition to the imposed embargo?
Fraudulent flag? Make **** up now?

And yes If the ship was heading to break sanctions thenyes it should be stopped. BUT we will never know since the ship was no where near Syria...

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
 
Fraudulent flag? Make **** up now?

And yes If the ship was heading to break sanctions thenyes it should be stopped. BUT we will never know since the ship was no where near Syria...

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk

Is a flag of convenience fraudulent? I don't know about this case but I bet most of the ships in the world, no matter where they're from, are registered in either Panama or Liberia/Monrovia.
 
Fraudulent flag? Make **** up now?

And yes If the ship was heading to break sanctions thenyes it should be stopped. BUT we will never know since the ship was no where near Syria...

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
Its not made up...its a fact from the story. You DID read the story you are poutraged over...didnt you?
 
Nothing more than a Brit bash fest, as per, by resident hater. Change the record for a change.
So you like being the errand bitch of the US? An US government hell bent on war with Iran?

And I like facts.

Fact is that Gibraltar is a colony and any decision to go after any ship is made in London, not by what's his name in Gibraltar. Claiming that the idiot in Gibraltar requested help to size a ship is just stupid and the fact that the media at the moment are not questioning this part is nuts.

Fact the claim by the British that it was IN Gibraltar waters is suspect when you know the area. Only reason you enter Gibraltar waters is if you are going to Gibraltar. You think they were doing that?

And finally being critical of the UK government actions does not mean you hate the people of said country.



Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
 
It is unknown [by me] if the Grace 1 was sailing in international waters. It seems the ship was seized in UK/Spanish waters.

Syria is under oil import/export sanctions by the US, UK, and the EU. Iran is under US oil import/export sanctions.

Rogue Valley:

As the Sraits of Gibraltar are about 14.5 km wide at their narrowest part, near Gibraltar, there is no truly international waters for international shipping to pass through. Thus the Sraits are an international waterway and protected for freedom of movement by the laws of the seas.

Just because the US, the U.K. and the EU have Syria under oil import/export sanctions does not mean that Iran is bound by such sanctions. Iran can trade with which ever regimes it wishes to and the U.K. has no right to stop it. Syria is a monstrous regime but US, UK, and EU law don't govern how other nations can trade outside of those three political jurisdictions.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
Reuters - Tehran fumes as Britain seizes Iranian oil tanker over Syria sanctions

Iranian ship was boarded by marines in contested waters off coast of Gibraltar

resize

British warship seizes Iranian oil tanker Grace 1 near Gibraltar.



Well done. Oil intended for the Assad regime and his proxy forces (Russia/Iran) in Syria. Spain has complained that the tanker was seized in Spanish waters.

Related: BBC - Iranian official threatens to seize British oil tanker

Guardian - Spain to lodge complaint over British seizure of oil tanker

I wonder how much the oil is worth. I suspect a game of tit for tat by the US. They shoot down a drone we have the British steal a tanker full of oil. Thats a fair exchange I would imagine.
 
Reuters - Tehran fumes as Britain seizes Iranian oil tanker over Syria sanctions

Iranian ship was boarded by marines in contested waters off coast of Gibraltar

resize

British warship seizes Iranian oil tanker Grace 1 near Gibraltar.



Well done. Oil intended for the Assad regime and his proxy forces (Russia/Iran) in Syria. Spain has complained that the tanker was seized in Spanish waters.

Related: BBC - Iranian official threatens to seize British oil tanker

Guardian - Spain to lodge complaint over British seizure of oil tanker

Theft and people are cheering about it.

Support for Assad? I mean, he's not a nice guy, but the US would have supported him had it been in their interests. The US does support the Saudis.
 
Reuters - Tehran fumes as Britain seizes Iranian oil tanker over Syria sanctions

Iranian ship was boarded by marines in contested waters off coast of Gibraltar

resize

British warship seizes Iranian oil tanker Grace 1 near Gibraltar.



Well done. Oil intended for the Assad regime and his proxy forces (Russia/Iran) in Syria. Spain has complained that the tanker was seized in Spanish waters.

Related: BBC - Iranian official threatens to seize British oil tanker

Guardian - Spain to lodge complaint over British seizure of oil tanker

Welp, I put figures to calculator and I got some interesting numbers.

That tanker carries about 300,000 short tons of cargo, in this case oil. There are 172.9 barrels of oil to one short ton. The current price for a barrel of crude is about $60.00 a barrel. Figure because of sanctions the Iranians discounted the oil to about $50.00 a barrel. That works out to about 2.5 billion dollars of cargo. How much money did we fly into Iran? How much was that drone again? Theft pays well apparently.
 
Back
Top Bottom