• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UK- Rochdale Rape Gang Getting on Well Back Home, after Short Prison Sentences, Failure to Deport

Well done you - 1 single thread about non-muslim paedophilia. :roll:

I've made dozens of posts related to the subject IC. Not enough for your tastes, perhaps, but that's not my concern. Urethra Franklin wishes to discuss sexual violence in Bosnia from 30 years ago, you wish to discuss the abuses involved in the Catholic Church, and meanwhile the OP you're both mucking up with diversionary tactics is:

Rape victims of the notorious Rochdale rape gang have been running into their attackers recently, on the same streets they were abducted from as children. Much hand wringing and liberal tears were shed when it was announced that the rapists would be deported back to Pakistan. Well here we are, and the British Courts and immigration services have failed yet again. The men, after brief prison terms, are back to their old neighborhoods. Enjoying the halal meats & fried chicken spots may remind them of their old favorite pastime- raping white girls. Will they begin assembling new rape gangs, and abducting 12 year old girls again for the purpose of sexual slavery? Why not? The British justice system is a joke. Everyone knows its a joke, especially the rapists who were essentially given slaps on the wrist, for committing some of most hideous acts upon children.

"They have been failed again" - victims of Rochdale grooming gang are still bumping into their attackers - Manchester Evening News

Rochdale child sex abuse ring - Wikipedia

Oswald Moseley, where are you when we need you old boy?
 
So why do you do so with rapists who happen to be muslim and/or Pakistani?

I see no problem with identifying rapists publicly, do you? I'm sure you followed the recent hate crime story involving 2 young LGBT women on a train ride in London. They were verbally abused by several males (mixture of adults & juveniles) punched in the face, had their faces bloodied, and the police never released the names or arrest photos of the perpetrators. Was it right to protect the identities of hate crime assailants? Should the police not identify criminals to the public?
 
~.................... meanwhile the OP you're both mucking up with diversionary tactics is:
nothing diversionary in taking any thread of yours to illustrate your ulterior motives in posting them. Which, as one can't point out enough, have absolutely nothing to do with you being concerned over the issue itself.
 
I see no problem with identifying rapists publicly, do you? I'm sure you followed the recent hate crime story involving 2 young LGBT women on a train ride in London. They were verbally abused by several males (mixture of adults & juveniles) punched in the face, had their faces bloodied, and the police never released the names or arrest photos of the perpetrators. Was it right to protect the identities of hate crime assailants? Should the police not identify criminals to the public?
As deflectiona go, just more of your silliness.

You, of all people, don't get to decide the law in Britain and that means you don't get to decide publications of suspects' identities before they are actually convicted.

But that wasn't the question anyway, you're just going off into one more of your dishonest gish gallops.
 
I've made dozens of posts related to the subject IC. Not enough for your tastes

Nice how you've shifted your claim from having started threads to now "dozens of posts." You almost got away with it.

meanwhile the OP you're both mucking up with diversionary tactics is:

The discussion has not been diverted - your OP shows your usual lack of concern for the victims or even any victims of rape unless the victims are white and the perpetrators are brown or black. We have a right to query the reason for your thread especially with your track record of dishonesty.

You equally deserve all the stick you got for your fanboyism of Oswald Moseley in your OP.
 
I see no problem with identifying rapists publicly, do you? I'm sure you followed the recent hate crime story involving 2 young LGBT women on a train ride in London. They were verbally abused by several males (mixture of adults & juveniles) punched in the face, had their faces bloodied, and the police never released the names or arrest photos of the perpetrators. Was it right to protect the identities of hate crime assailants? Should the police not identify criminals to the public?


By all means identify criminals.
I don't judge all Catholic priests or all Serbs for the atrocities committed by some.

Your racism and Islamophobia screams from every one of your posts. Look at your language and the way your anger is selective.


You claim to be concerned for these poor girls - your sexist language elsewhere suggests otherwise.
 
Nice how you've shifted your claim from having started threads to now "dozens of posts." You almost got away with it.



The discussion has not been diverted - your OP shows your usual lack of concern for the victims or even any victims of rape unless the victims are white and the perpetrators are brown or black. We have a right to query the reason for your thread especially with your track record of dishonesty.

You equally deserve all the stick you got for your fanboyism of Oswald Moseley in your OP.

By all means identify criminals.
I don't judge all Catholic priests or all Serbs for the atrocities committed by some.

Your racism and Islamophobia screams from every one of your posts. Look at your language and the way your anger is selective.


You claim to be concerned for these poor girls - your sexist language elsewhere suggests otherwise.

In your little cult of faux moralism (political correctness) a person of my background is supposed to care equally about what happens to people of varying cultures, races, religions, etc. That's simply not how people are, and I seriously doubt whether either of you have started any threads about the rape problems in India, the abuses of women in Saudi Arabia, or the uneven abortion requirements in Israel, just to name a few topics that rarely if ever get a mention by most liberals, socialists, or supposed centrists.
 
In your little cult of faux moralism (political correctness) a person of my background is supposed to care equally about what happens to people of varying cultures, races, religions, etc. That's simply not how people are...........................~
That's simply not how YOU are and we all get that.

Especially when considering the background you clearly embrace.
 
In your little cult of faux moralism (political correctness) a person of my background is supposed to care equally about what happens to people of varying cultures, races, religions, etc. That's simply not how people are, and I seriously doubt whether either of you have started any threads about the rape problems in India, the abuses of women in Saudi Arabia, or the uneven abortion requirements in Israel, just to name a few topics that rarely if ever get a mention by most liberals, socialists, or supposed centrists.

Acquittals in Mukhtaran Mai gang rape case

https://www.debatepolitics.com/aust...a-recriminalises-gay-sex.html?highlight=india

https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...-should-take-blame-survey.html?highlight=rape

https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...lash-saudi-arabia.html?highlight=saudi+arabia

That's thread titles I started only. This is fun, can you challenge me on anything else I have done that you are simply incapable of equalling?
 
In your little cult of faux moralism (political correctness) a person of my background is supposed to care equally about what happens to people of varying cultures, races, religions, etc. That's simply not how people are, and I seriously doubt whether either of you have started any threads about the rape problems in India, the abuses of women in Saudi Arabia, or the uneven abortion requirements in Israel, just to name a few topics that rarely if ever get a mention by most liberals, socialists, or supposed centrists.


FAIL

Several posts to my name about my opposition to the imposition of Islamic headgear for women, my support for the ban on the burqa and other face coverings in public buildings, the position of women in Saudi, and I have commented on the appalling bus rape in India that resulted in that poor young woman's death. By your logic, she was just a lousy date.
 
In all of this and any other exchange of the past (nearly) 5 years with TAAC, it shows that the far more economic response would simply be to point out that practically anything he posts is a lie.
 
In all of this and any other exchange of the past (nearly) 5 years with TAAC, it shows that the far more economic response would simply be to point out that practically anything he posts is a lie.

At least he's consistent. :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom