• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'We Won't Change Our Behavior,' Kremlin Says to Britain

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,262
Reaction score
82,617
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
'We Won't Change Our Behavior,' Kremlin Says to Britain | The Moscow Times

The Kremlin said on Friday that Britain was responsible for damaging its relations with Russia.

b99826f4-78bb-11e9-ad80-fa163e074e61_360.jpg


6/7/19
The Kremlin said on Friday that Britain was responsible for damaging its relations with Russia and rebuffed a call made by London for Moscow to change its behavior on the international stage, Russian news agencies reported. British Prime Minister Theresa May's spokeswoman said on Thursday Britain could only have a better relationship with Russia if it changed its behavior. "No we won't change our behavior because all Russia wants is mutually beneficial relations that are based on taking into accounts the interests of one another," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov was quoted as saying by Interfax news agency.

Indeed. Britain should treat her Salisbury tourists from Russia much better! :2razz:

Related: Kremlin to Britain: We Won't Change Our Behavior | The New York Times
 
What else could Britain expect form Putin? Honesty?

would that be the same Britain that begged Putin to speak out against Scottish Independence from the UK in 2014 .... they might have saved the UK then ... but they won't be able to do so when we call Indyref2 very soon even fat boy Trump won't be able to stop it
 
would that be the same Britain that begged Putin to speak out against Scottish Independence from the UK in 2014 .... they might have saved the UK then ... but they won't be able to do so when we call Indyref2 very soon even fat boy Trump won't be able to stop it

How could Trump stop Indyref2?

Why would Trump stop Indyref2?

You remind me of a Scottish proverb... "Twelve highlanders and a bagpipe make a rebellion"

So many rebellions. So many failures.
 
How could Trump stop Indyref2?

Why would Trump stop Indyref2?

You remind me of a Scottish proverb... "Twelve highlanders and a bagpipe make a rebellion"

So many rebellions. So many failures.

Barak Obama interfered first time around and that fat roaster has already spoken out against it


we will soon see about failures
 
'We Won't Change Our Behavior,' Kremlin Says to Britain | The Moscow Times

The Kremlin said on Friday that Britain was responsible for damaging its relations with Russia.

b99826f4-78bb-11e9-ad80-fa163e074e61_360.jpg




Indeed. Britain should treat her Salisbury tourists from Russia much better! :2razz:

Related: Kremlin to Britain: We Won't Change Our Behavior | The New York Times

he i have to agree with putler and his ozero, they simply can not ...this empire is dead already from 1917 , rf is zombie which can move only with help of oil and gas high prices
 
Meanwhile the EU is looking on at both like this:

16211500.jpg
 
Indeed. Britain should treat her Salisbury tourists from Russia much better! :2razz:

Well, yes, Litvinenko was first poisoned by radioactive polonium, then Skripales were poisoned by a “novichok”, but in the end - let's do business as usual.
 
He has an opinion.... And?

Tell me. Since Culloden what rebellion has succeeded?

Indyref is not a rebellion you Americans are clueless it's a exercise in democracy the UK has two signatories Scotland and England ...and if London has broken the act of union 1707 we might not even need a referendum to leave the UK either way

and fyi Culloden was not about Scottish Independence it was about putting Charles Edward Stuart's father on the throne in London as the rightful heir of James the 7th of Scotland and the 2nd of England and putting a Catholic back on the throne with the support of Catholics in Scotland and in North west England .... you see as a foreigner you know damn feck all about our history Culloden was not a battle between Scotland and the rest of the UK, many of the men that fought on the jacobite side were English and the majority of the soldiers fighting the Jacobites were Scots
 
Indyref is not a rebellion you Americans are clueless it's a exercise in democracy the UK has two signatories Scotland and England ...and if London has broken the act of union 1707 we might not even need a referendum to leave the UK either way

and fyi Culloden was not about Scottish Independence it was about putting Charles Edward Stuart's father on the throne in London as the rightful heir of James the 7th of Scotland and the 2nd of England and putting a Catholic back on the throne with the support of Catholics in Scotland and in North west England .... you see as a foreigner you know damn feck all about our history Culloden was not a battle between Scotland and the rest of the UK, many of the men that fought on the jacobite side were English and the majority of the soldiers fighting the Jacobites were Scots

So, no wins for the Scots since Culloden....

You could have saved many, many taps on the keyboard.....

And yes. I knew about the history of the Jacobites, the failed attempts prior to Culloden, the French interfering, the rift between pro Jacobites and non, the case of "taking a knife to a gunfight" .....

Clueless, no.

Indeed not.


And you never answered.....

How could Trump stop Indyref2?

Why would Trump stop Indyref2?
 
Back
Top Bottom