• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

British Police who Covered Up Racially Motivated Rape Declare War on Thought Crime

truthatallcost said:
I was aware of Shah's comments about murdering Afrikaners. What do you mean by 'did you make a complaint'?
Click to expand...

Um.. check your facts. The victims of necklacing were alleged collaborators of Apartheid. Maybe the word "alleged" or "collaborators" has fooled you. Can I be clear you actually care about black victims for a change?
 
Infinite Chaos said:
Um.. check your facts. The victims of necklacing were alleged collaborators of Apartheid. Maybe the word "alleged" or "collaborators" has fooled you. Can I be clear you actually care about black victims for a change?
Click to expand...

Right, my mistake. And yes, I do care about black victims in such cases. I won't make excuses or try to lie about this the way you have concerning the victims of grooming gangs in the UK.
 
Fledermaus said:
Still waiting for evidence to support you our contention.
Click to expand...

Are you really this clueless? When police officials silenced rape survivors in order to protect the rapists, they ensured that the sexual abuse would continue. Thus they gave their blessing, because political correctness was a higher priority to them than protecting at risk children, and arresting the rapists.
 
truthatallcost said:
Right, my mistake. And yes, I do care about black victims in such cases.
Click to expand...
Aah, language is sooo revealing.
I won't make excuses or try to lie about this the way you have concerning the victims of grooming gangs in the UK.
Click to expand...
Priceless.

Starts out declaring he won't lie and then proceeds to do precisely that.:lamo

Nothing to see here folks, not beyond the usual.
 
truthatallcost said:
Are you really this clueless? When police officials silenced rape survivors in order to protect the rapists, they ensured that the sexual abuse would continue. Thus they gave their blessing, because political correctness was a higher priority to them than protecting at risk children, and arresting the rapists.
Click to expand...

Warning against hate speech isn't silencing rape victims.
 
Chagos said:
Aah, language is sooo revealing. Priceless.

Starts out declaring he won't lie and then proceeds to do precisely that.:lamo

Nothing to see here folks, not beyond the usual.
Click to expand...

Oh hey Chagos. Welcome back.

One can really read anything they want into an internet comment, can't they? That doesn't mean their conclusions are correct.

Something more easily discernible is the way that you and Infinite Chaos have spent years downplaying the Pakistani rape gangs that target white children in the UK.
 
Enhancing lies with further lies doesn't really cut it, all it shows is how dishonesty of a poster is rampant.
 
truthatallcost said:
Oh hey Chagos. Welcome back.

One can really read anything they want into an internet comment, can't they? That doesn't mean their conclusions are correct.
Click to expand...
when it comes to assessment of your general attitude and subsequent demeanor, validity of conclusions drawn has been confirmed for years, last but not least by yourself.

One of those conclusions being that you habitually resort to dishonesty as in
Something more easily discernible is the way that you and Infinite Chaos have spent years downplaying the Pakistani rape gangs that target white children in the UK.
Click to expand...
IOW you lie and when challenged to evidence such slanderous claims, cowardly run from the challenge.
 
truthatallcost said:
DuOQfl_WsAAkl9n


At least one of these police departments was implicated in deliberately covering up racially motivated child rape. But they're now showing where their true allegiance lies, and deciding to raid the home of anyone caught saying politically incorrect things online! Let the children be fed to the wolves, someone is typing a naughty word somewhere in England!
Click to expand...
Excerpt from alleged SouthYorkshirePolice tweet, requests:
"In addition to reporting hate crime, please report non-crime hate incidents"

What's the point in reporting a non-crime hate incident to police?

Do police have some special legal authorization which to act upon?

If so; exactly who decides what constitutes non-crime 'hate incidents'?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Nationalists may be the last hope for sanity in Great Britain!
 
Last edited:
truthatallcost said:
Right, my mistake. And yes, I do care about black victims in such cases. I won't make excuses or try to lie about this the way you have concerning the victims of grooming gangs in the UK.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah, I really believe you care about the black victims. About as much as you cared about the non-white girls and boys targeted by Pakistani grooming gangs.
 
Chagos said:
Aah, language is sooo revealing. Priceless~
Click to expand...

I let him have the benefit of the doubt on that one.

truthatallcost said:
~ downplaying the Pakistani rape gangs that target white children in the UK.
Click to expand...

Explaining that they started out raping kids in their own community and in other ethnic communities before going on to vulnerable white teenagers is downplaying rape gangs?

Are you that stupid?
 
Infinite Chaos said:
Oh yeah, I really believe you care about the black victims. About as much as you cared about the non-white girls and boys targeted by Pakistani grooming gangs.
Click to expand...

One key difference; the necklacing of black victims (by black perpetrators of course) occurred in the 1980's, far before my time. I was a toddler as this entire event was winding down. The systemic rape of white British girls by Pakistani men is an on going problem, so of course I'm more concerned about the abuse currently taking place. Furthermore, the non-white victims story seems to be mostly drivel derived by apologists and liars- there hasn't been many if any non-white victims of the Pakistani rape gangs since the early 2000's, AFAIK.
 
Empirica said:
Excerpt from alleged SouthYorkshirePolice tweet, requests:
"In addition to reporting hate crime, please report non-crime hate incidents"

What's the point in reporting a non-crime hate incident to police?

Do police have some special legal authorization which to act upon?

If so; exactly who decides what constitutes non-crime 'hate incidents'?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Nationalists may be the last hope for sanity in Great Britain!
Click to expand...

I thought exactly the same thing when I read the Tweet. The villains in British government want to turn citizens against one another by way of encouraging them to snitch on legal behavior! The USSR functioned much in the same manner.
 
Infinite Chaos said:
I let him have the benefit of the doubt on that one.



Explaining that they started out raping kids in their own community and in other ethnic communities before going on to vulnerable white teenagers is downplaying rape gangs?

Are you that stupid?
Click to expand...

Are you so stupid as to think adults can't spot the pattern of victimization which follows the same racial themes throughout Europe?
 
truthatallcost said:
You equated rape victims complaining of abuse with hate speech. Was this an error, or do you mean this?
Click to expand...
That is the dumbest, crudest thing I've ever read here.

Correct that to "have read here from you today".
 
truthatallcost said:
One key difference; the necklacing of black victims (by black perpetrators of course) occurred in the 1980's, far before my time. I was a toddler as this entire event was winding down. The systemic rape of white British girls by Pakistani men is an on going problem, so of course I'm more concerned about the abuse currently taking place. Furthermore, the non-white victims story seems to be mostly drivel derived by apologists and liars- there hasn't been many if any non-white victims of the Pakistani rape gangs since the early 2000's, AFAIK.
Click to expand...

AFAIK in your case means very little. I don't recall any necklacing in Britain, ever. Nor in Pakistan for that matter, so it's only relevant if you believe that the melanin content of the victim's skin is signficant.
 
truthatallcost said:
One key difference; the necklacing of black victims (by black perpetrators of course) occurred in the 1980's, far before my time. I was a toddler as this entire event was winding down. The systemic rape of white British girls by Pakistani men is an on going problem, so of course I'm more concerned about the abuse currently taking place. Furthermore, the non-white victims story seems to be mostly drivel derived by apologists and liars- there hasn't been many if any non-white victims of the Pakistani rape gangs since the early 2000's, AFAIK.
Click to expand...

The vast majority of victims of grooming gangs are white but focusing on one race or another does a disservice to all victims. Calling anyone who doesn't immediately say all the victims are white an apologist or liar says more about you and your politics than anything else about any other poster.

I would explain further the genesis of these gangs and how they start off but that element doesn't tend to get publicised on many alt-right forums so I wouldn't expect you to care about the original victims of any old or new rape gang.

truthatallcost said:
Are you so stupid as to think adults can't spot the pattern of victimization which follows the same racial themes throughout Europe?
Click to expand...

Well, you've failed to spot the patterns of the genesis of any asian rape gang so far. Guess that makes you the stupid one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom