• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Do You People Want War With Russia ?

Infinite Chaos said:
Not capable of your own original thought eh? Not the first time either.
Click to expand...

What you choose to focus on is as enlightening as what you wish to dodge.

Firstly , let's see what you want to focus on

The thought that you think I might actually want to have you as some sort of posting guru is highly amusing and also shows more than a little conceit on your behalf imo. I mean who wouldn't want to imitate someone who has shown a stunning capacity to misunderstand and misrepresent the posts/positions of others ? :lamo

Secondly , that which you wish to avoid

Your own ineptitude in not understanding what another poster has said and your own dishonesty in trying to berate them over it. Not to mention trying to ascribe your own introductions to them in order to , well, attempt to berate them some more :doh

You can try to use me to preen your feathers if it pleases you but it is a wholly shambolic exercise in reality.
 
Fledermaus said:
Hey, he has his opinions. I have also seen him speak out in opposition of Putin.

I only ask you not broadbrush the man.
Click to expand...

I call em as I see em. He is a regular defender/apologist for the Putin regime in regards to Crimea and Ukraine, and for Assad in regards to chemical weapons.
 
Tangmo said:
The thread and topic are not slav history which is why I only referred to it in context and in passing concerning Russia. I presented a summary survey paragraph to include quoting Putin on Russian history, culture, society, civilization and Russia's many same systems of government, i.e., dictatorship of one kind or another. You guyz are carrying on about slav history and are making other attempts to divert.

Putin is pursuing brinkmanship in Ukraine in the Strait, Azov Sea and with a new and present buildup at the Ukraine border. Your posts consistently promote Russia and attempt to popularize the Russian armed forces while simultaneously attempting to diminish or denigrate the US armed forces vs the Russian military. This is nothing new however as their are veterans and there are veterans.

All the same it remains fact the Putin Fanboys cannot discuss or refute the Pentagon Third Offset Strategy that's been in place since 2014. So allow me to provide you with a much needed assist thx...


3rd Offset Strategy 101: What It Is, What the Tech Focuses Are

direct-energy.jpg


The Sodium Guidestar at the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Starfire Optical Range resides on a 6,240 foot hilltop at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. The Army and Navy are developing their own laser weapons systems. Air Force photo.

Basically, an offset strategy is part of a long-term competitive strategy; a peacetime competition between rival defense establishments that aims to generate and sustain strategic advantage. Offset strategies are not about formulating a general unified theory for armed conflict. They instead aim to bolster and extend U.S. conventional deterrence against great powers able to produce or acquire technologically advanced weapons systems.

It’s how we strengthen our military’s competitive edge. Offset strategies are not solely about technological approaches, although all offset strategies have a powerful technological component. They are about finding the right combination of technologies and operational and organizational constructs to achieve decisive operational advantage and thus bolster conventional deterrence.

It’s something we’ve done successfully twice before.

Access Denied


I offer this public service with the great aspiration you can get on topic. The Pentagon's 6th Generation Warfare is in the next block of instruction for you guys given it's the guts of the Third Offset Strategy.
Click to expand...

Thread and topic seem to be where there is a problem, you started bringing up slavic history and got called out on it, now you are trying to avoid that all together, you were the one who injected such into the discussion and now you do not want to admit you were wrong.
 
oneworld2 said:
What you choose to focus on is as enlightening as what you wish to dodge.

Firstly , let's see what you want to focus on

The thought that you think I might actually want to have you as some sort of posting guru is highly amusing and also shows more than a little conceit on your behalf imo. I mean who wouldn't want to imitate someone who has shown a stunning capacity to misunderstand and misrepresent the posts/positions of others ? :lamo

Secondly , that which you wish to avoid

Your own ineptitude in not understanding what another poster has said and your own dishonesty in trying to berate them over it. Not to mention trying to ascribe your own introductions to them in order to , well, attempt to berate them some more :doh

You can try to use me to preen your feathers if it pleases you but it is a wholly shambolic exercise in reality.
Click to expand...

Well that was a lot of hot air! Anything on the subject of the thread or prefer to continue to discuss me?
 
Infinite Chaos said:
Well that was a lot of hot air! Anything on the subject of the thread or prefer to continue to discuss me?
Click to expand...

You have come out with nothing but hot air and BS claims since you appeared here. Why would discussing you be of any value ?

It's just okay for you to want to discuss me , apparently ( which is all you have actually done ) :roll:

If you have anything to add about the thread content itself , knock yourself out
 
Chagos said:
.....because circular reasoning always is.
Click to expand...

When that doesn't work - copy the style and wording of the poster you are "debating" with... nobody will ever notice.
 
hmm was with russia would come at a big cost dont think it would be worth it for any nation so im guessing no country wants that but i bet putin benefits from spreading the idea that he is bravely defending the place from a hostile world
 
blarg said:
hmm was with russia would come at a big cost dont think it would be worth it for any nation so im guessing no country wants that but i bet putin benefits from spreading the idea that he is bravely defending the place from a hostile world
Click to expand...

War with ANY nuclear armed nation would come at a huge cost. This doesn't mean those countries should be able to throw their weight around and think they are untouchable.
No right thinking poster wants war with Russia however many of us are also aware of the nature of the beast - especially with regard to asymmetric disinformation and disruption caused here.
 
WCH said:
You can.. Many will. Always have.
Click to expand...

Nice deflection there. You are pretty much excusing any future invasion of the US (or whatever nation state may be here in the future) because 'we did it too.'
 
Infinite Chaos said:
War with ANY nuclear armed nation would come at a huge cost. This doesn't mean those countries should be able to throw their weight around and think they are untouchable.
No right thinking poster wants war with Russia however many of us are also aware of the nature of the beast - especially with regard to asymmetric disinformation and disruption caused here.
Click to expand...

You have no idea what you're dealing with.


But you say that nuclear armed states shouldn't be able to throw their weight around. Does that apply to the US ........ or is that okay because the US is 'the West' and the West is 'right'?


As for dis-information, what about the UK's very own dis-information campaign - the ironically named 'Integrity Initiative'?
 
Westphalian said:
You have no idea what you're dealing with
Click to expand...

Well, you guys managed to disrupt the US election so I'd say you are pretty effective at what you do.

Westphalian said:
Does that apply to the US
Click to expand...

Yes. Next question?

Westphalian said:
As for dis-information, what about the UK's very own dis-information campaign - the ironically named 'Integrity Initiative'?
Click to expand...

Certainly nowhere near as effective as the Russian version - nor anywhere near as cheap I bet. You guys should hire yourselves to teach us.
 
Geoist said:
Nice deflection there. You are pretty much excusing any future invasion of the US (or whatever nation state may be here in the future) because 'we did it too.'
Click to expand...

I'm not excusing it but, our government is.... in spades.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom