- Joined
- Jun 16, 2018
- Messages
- 2,647
- Reaction score
- 286
- Location
- East
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
What Putinista submits here is the usual bovine manure.
What remains puzzling is what the heck he thinks he's achieving here. Swaying opinion of anyone towards Kremlin lies being seen as anything other than what they are?
The total lack of support, indeed garnered opposition, would tell anyone with even average self-awareness something, but either the pay is so great that he doesn't mind the ridicule heaped on his posts and thus him, or he's so far gone on his own propaganda that he notices nothing else.
Intriguing, indeed.
The problem is that you don't understand the nature of debate and of democracy.
The point about debate is that alternative views are as legitimate as those of the sheep like baying majority. Moreover, the majority is not, by definition, right. The majority is simply the majority.
Your attempts to dismiss alternative pro Russian views as illegitimate, or posted only by people being paid by a foreign power, are not just ludicrous but also are not inconsistent with the tactics employed by authoritarian dictators. I can see why western democracy is increasingly mis-trusted by its own citizens.