• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UK Orders Background Checks on 3,000 Foreign Born Doctors after Psychiatrist Scandal

Someone seeking to establish themselves as a licensed psychiatrist is either qualified, or unqualified. There are no kinda/sorta qualified psychiatrists.

Flat out lie. You claimed she had no qualifications. Your post is there and cannot be edited into something else now. Own your lie.

This thread is about the need for the UK to conduct background checks on doctors who're already practicing medicine. I never bashed 'brown people' any where in this thread.

Yes there is a need to conduct background checks - you also have a history of making threads about the immigrantion of brown people into Europe and lying about the harm caused as if there are no crimes caused by indigenous peoples.
 
Flat out lie. You claimed she had no qualifications. Your post is there and cannot be edited into something else now. Own your lie.

A B.A. degree in human biology is not a qualification to practice psychiatry. Without the needed M.D. + hospital residency + board certified license... She has no qualifications. Why do you fail to understand this? Now you're demonstrating exactly the mindset that got the UK into this predicament in the first place-granting fictitious qualifications to an uneducated, unlicensed person just because she happens to be an immigrant, and like you love saying, a "brown person".

Yes there is a need to conduct background checks - you also have a history of making threads about the immigrantion of brown people into Europe and lying about the harm caused as if there are no crimes caused by indigenous peoples.

I don't the believe the benefits of immigration outweigh the negatives at this point. There are surely some success stories, immigrants running successful businesses, etc. But I don't believe long term growth via immigration is a wise plan, or a sustainable one. The accepted status quo in your country and mine is to only tout the virtues of immigration, and an entire industry of blackmail artists exist to try and stop anyone from also mentioning the negative effects of immigration. That's just foolish, and the more you try to repress something, the more forcefully it pushes back, sometimes with a much greater ferocity than the repressionists ever expected.
 
Prior to entering the UK and being allowed to set up shop with no qualifications ~
A B.A. degree in human biology is not a qualification to practice psychiatry. Without the needed M.D. + hospital residency + board certified license... She has no qualifications. Why do you fail to understand this? Now you're demonstrating exactly the mindset that got the UK into this predicament in the first place-granting fictitious qualifications to an uneducated, unlicensed person just because she happens to be an immigrant, and like you love saying, a "brown person"

If YOU didn't write "Prior to entering the UK and being allowed to set up shop with no qualifications" then I am a liar. If YOU wrote those words then you are lying. It's pretty simple.

I don't the believe the benefits of immigration outweigh the negatives at this point ~

That's finally a different argument however you are not taken seriously enough to merit much serious discussion on the different types of immigration / benefits of etc. We all know what you are about on this forum and what your underlying and continuous agenda is. If you were another poster, I would discuss further with you but well.... you're "you" so I really can't be bothered. Sooner, rather than later you will resort to type so why should anyone really bother?
 
As a Trumper, you wouldn't care. You'd welcome the Russian Army into Alaska tomorrow if it pleased Trumpov.

Maybe the Russian army should stage a migrant caravan and descend upon our southern border. That way, you'd let them in right away, with no weapons fired.
 
If YOU didn't write "Prior to entering the UK and being allowed to set up shop with no qualifications" then I am a liar. If YOU wrote those words then you are lying. It's pretty simple.

You are as you say are. A B.A. in biology is a qualification to apply to pursue an education in psychiatry, not practice it for a living. You've pretty well spent this entire thread lying or showing you haven't a clue what you're arguing.


That's finally a different argument however you are not taken seriously enough to merit much serious discussion on the different types of immigration / benefits of etc. We all know what you are about on this forum and what your underlying and continuous agenda is. If you were another poster, I would discuss further with you but well.... you're "you" so I really can't be bothered. Sooner, rather than later you will resort to type so why should anyone really bother?

You can't discuss it with anyone who disagrees with your opinion, much less someone like me who'll expose you. So do what you cats do, get on your bicycle and pedal.
 
Projection time galore.

Somebody constantly revealed as lying accusing others of lying, somebody constantly exposed for what he is, fantasizing over being the great exposer of others.

That kind of cognitive dissonance must take great deal of effort, what a pity though that it achieves the exact opposite of what it desires to achieve.
 
wow another "look how evil and scary foreign people from non-white countries are", boring and totally predictable.
 
wow another "look how evil and scary foreign people from non-white countries are", boring and totally predictable.

New Zealand isn't a non-white country. Thanks for offering your usual misinformed 2 cents.
 
New Zealand isn't a non-white country. Thanks for offering your usual misinformed 2 cents.

:lamo Yes, because the Indian doctor and the person trained in Sudan also came from New Zealand. Because clearly you talked about more than the New Zealand case, you also talked about countries where the people are most certainly non-white. So you are the one who is misinforming people and making fake untrue comments.
 
:lamo Yes, because the Indian doctor and the person trained in Sudan also came from New Zealand. Because clearly you talked about more than the New Zealand case, you also talked about countries where the people are most certainly non-white. So you are the one who is misinforming people and making fake untrue comments.

You're free to interpret the thread however you wish. I was just informing you that your previous comment was untrue.

And why is it somehow uncouth to discuss a doctor's educational background when they've committed such medical errors as decapitating a baby? Because they're 'brown'?
 
You're free to interpret the thread however you wish. I was just informing you that your previous comment was untrue.

And why is it somehow uncouth to discuss a doctor's educational background when they've committed such medical errors as decapitating a baby? Because they're 'brown'?

No, I respond to your views in this and numerous other threads who mostly have one theme.
 
This story has been picked up and promoted on a variety of sites like storefront / breibart etc but the funny thing is the fake doctor is a New Zealander.



OP tried to make this about eeebil brown migrants from "brown people land" but facts are yet again, not on his side.

Brown people but are not? You can’t even pronounce that name while keeping a strait face.
 
No, I respond to your views in this and numerous other threads who mostly have one theme.

My theme is to speak up on issues that most men are too cowered to address honestly. Maybe things are different in the Netherlands where 8.5/10 people are white, and you can go around spouting non consequential, theoretic pablum about how all the world's cultures are equal.
 
My theme is to speak up on issues that most men are too cowered to address honestly. Maybe things are different in the Netherlands where 8.5/10 people are white, and you can go around spouting non consequential, theoretic pablum about how all the world's cultures are equal.

No, you theme is to speak negatively about people of certain groups virtually all the time. And it is not about the number of white people in the Netherlands. We are totally multicultural and here there are as much right wing dick heads who try to spew hatred against foreigners or refugees to further their own political power.
 
No, you theme is to speak negatively about people of certain groups virtually all the time. And it is not about the number of white people in the Netherlands. We are totally multicultural and here there are as much right wing dick heads who try to spew hatred against foreigners or refugees to further their own political power.

8.5/10 homogeneous = "totally multicultural" to you. Sorry if I don't put much weight into that.
 
8.5/10 homogeneous = "totally multicultural" to you. Sorry if I don't put much weight into that.

Well as always you are talking nonsense, in the UK the number of white British is about 81.9%. In fact 87.1% of all people in the UK are WHITE!!!!!!

The number of non white immigrants in the Netherlands might (as a percentage) might even be bigger than the one in the UK. So stop whining and making nonsense because that is what you are doing, peddling nonsense. The UK is about as multicultural as the Netherlands.
 
You are as you say are. A B.A. in biology is a qualification to apply to pursue an education in psychiatry, not practice it for a living. You've pretty well spent this entire thread lying or showing you haven't a clue what you're arguing.

Let me ask plain and simple as your words are there and you can't edit your posts anymore to pretend something else. Did you say she had no qualifications or not? Yes or no.

~ You can't discuss it with anyone who disagrees with your opinion, much less someone like me who'll expose you. So do what you cats do, get on your bicycle and pedal.

When you show yourself capable of honest discussion without lying, without resorting to slurs about them "ebil brown peepil" then the "cats" will discuss with you. Until then, I'll continue to swat your attempts at discussion around for fun when I'm bored.

Brown people but are not? You can’t even pronounce that name while keeping a strait face.

I'd point out the irony but I doubt you'd even begin to understand.
 
Let me ask plain and simple as your words are there and you can't edit your posts anymore to pretend something else. Did you say she had no qualifications or not? Yes or no.



When you show yourself capable of honest discussion without lying, without resorting to slurs about them "ebil brown peepil" then the "cats" will discuss with you. Until then, I'll continue to swat your attempts at discussion around for fun when I'm bored.



I'd point out the irony but I doubt you'd even begin to understand.

For what feels like the one millionth time- holding a degree in biology is not a qualification to practice psychiatry. She has no qualifications in her field.

'Diversity is good, and therefore immigration is good', isn't a defendable position. That's why all who attempt it eventually resort to the great debating strategy of name calling.
 
The naztive population of NZ isn't white. Those are the mostly British immigrants. For your information.

Showing your not-so-secret bias again manc.

- you refer to British NZers as 'immigrants', when they've lived in NZ for 200 years.
- you refer to everyone living in the UK as equally 'British', and wouldn't dare call a native born an immigrant.
 
Showing your not-so-secret bias again manc.

- you refer to British NZers as 'immigrants', when they've lived in NZ for 200 years.
- you refer to everyone living in the UK as equally 'British', and wouldn't dare call a native born an immigrant.

A person born in New Zealand is as British as an American. You have a curiously racist worldview which I really can't puzzle out, and don't particularly want to.
 
8.5/10 homogeneous = "totally multicultural" to you. Sorry if I don't put much weight into that.

You guys. Damn. Some Americans will see a black customs agent, umpteen generations American, talking to a Russian immigrant and say the black guy represents diversity. Do you really think 'homogenous' means all the same complexion?
 
A person born in New Zealand is as British as an American. You have a curiously racist worldview which I really can't puzzle out, and don't particularly want to.

There's lots of East Indians here (Canada) who are more Canadian than I am. I'm about as white as you can be but I'm only second generation. I don't have any Canadian grandparents but some racially-oriented types will see me talking to a guy who's grandparents were all born in Canada and think the other guy represents diversity and I'm 'homogeneity'.
 
Back
Top Bottom