• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will Belarus Be Putler’s Next Victim? Another Kremlin-driven crisis may be coming to Eastern Europe

Litwin

Litwin

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2017
Messages
33,607
Reaction score
5,193
Location
GDL/Sweden
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
"Will Belarus Be Putler’s Next Victim?
Another Kremlin-driven crisis may be coming to Eastern Europe"
Click to expand...

this week i have seen so many articles about putler´s bamboostan the new appetite for WAR and OCCUPATION , so why question , will it be Bielarus´this time? Why? will this powerful rebels country https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiCyZNaEiEk get down as Putler´s fascist despotic crime cartel ozero thinks , or this coward attack will finish off khan juchi project (mongols) ?

https://observer.com/2017/02/belarus-national-security-nato-vladimir-putin/
from: 58:00

"Belarusian Leader Has Harsh Words For Russia, West -- And Warning For Moscow "
https://www.rferl.org/a/belarus-luk...ia-west--and-warning-for-moscow/29189360.html
 
Last edited:


Drygva -Sigh of War

 
Belarus, then Lithuania. He has to connect Kaliningrad Oblast with Mother Russia. I have no doubt he wants to do so.

I do doubt, however, that he is that crazy because NATO would come down on Russia like hammer if he did.
 
Beaudreaux said:
Belarus, then Lithuania. He has to connect Kaliningrad Oblast with Mother Russia. I have no doubt he wants to do so.

I do doubt, however, that he is that crazy because NATO would come down on Russia like hammer if he did.
Click to expand...

do you think that Muscovite hordes capable of break down Belarusian nation /state?
 
Litwin said:
do you think that Muscovite hordes capable of break down Belarusian nation /state?
Click to expand...

I do, unfortunately. I also think that it would take many lives and great destruction for NATO could get them out, but that NATO would win out in the end.

Unlike Ukraine, I don't think that NATO would stand by and act only after it's, too, late. I think NATO would intervene early on.
 
Beaudreaux said:
I do, unfortunately. I also think that it would take many lives and great destruction for NATO could get them out, but that NATO would win out in the end.

Unlike Ukraine, I don't think that NATO would stand by and act only after it's, too, late. I think NATO would intervene early on.
Click to expand...

i think its much more complicated task for ozero, than take over 3 regions in Ukraine . i´d recommend to you watch this from 58.00 to from: 1.04 , Maria Snegovaya ( is an Adjunct Fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis and a Ph.D.) made a great point here.

 
"russian " analytics, journalists on this subject

 
Beaudreaux said:
Belarus, then Lithuania. He has to connect Kaliningrad Oblast with Mother Russia. I have no doubt he wants to do so.

I do doubt, however, that he is that crazy because NATO would come down on Russia like hammer if he did.
Click to expand...

Belarus is already on extremely good terms with russia so it is doubtful he would ever have a need or want to invade them at this time, for other countries he would try to break them down economically or socially, If you watch ukraine it is a broke nation spending mmost of it;s money on a proxy war and has already had a technical default on it's debt even if not a hard default, if russia wanted a country like lithuania they would fund proxies to bankrupt them and try to sway them into russias sphere rather than invade them,.
 
beerftw said:
Belarus is already on extremely good terms with russia so it is doubtful he would ever have a need or want to invade them at this time, for other countries he would try to break them down economically or socially, If you watch ukraine it is a broke nation spending mmost of it;s money on a proxy war and has already had a technical default on it's debt even if not a hard default, if russia wanted a country like lithuania they would fund proxies to bankrupt them and try to sway them into russias sphere rather than invade them,.
Click to expand...


Lithuania is such a small, de-populating state, that it's increasingly less viable. No need to do anything, its EU membership is stripping it of its young, its brightest, and making it an even less attractive place to live.

As for Belarus, your point is well made. Russia and Belarus share a Union State. It's a bit like speculating on whether Canada will be the US's next victim.
 
beerftw said:
Belarus is already on extremely good terms with russia.
Click to expand...
so for your " extremely good terms with "russia" and occupation /annexation are the same ? and "

extremely good terms with "russia"
Click to expand...
really? with mongol ulus so called "russia"!!! what Prigozhin is giving to you to the lunch in Savushkino 55?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Russian_ban_on_Belarusian_dairy_products
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/02/06/what-exactly-is-going-on-between-russia-and-belarus/
 
Westphalian said:
Lithuania is such a small, de-populating state, that it's increasingly less viable. No need to do anything, its EU membership is stripping it of its young, its brightest, and making it an even less attractive place to live.

As for Belarus, your point is well made. Russia and Belarus share a Union State. It's a bit like speculating on whether Canada will be the US's next victim.
Click to expand...

why your mongols juchi are in the line to get residence there?

its funny to see when Nigeria with snow (bamboostan) comperes itself with Top counters :lamo . by the way, your said many times exactly the same words about Crimea before 2014
 
No not Belarus they have great relations with Russia, Lithuania is barely a blip on the radar... I think Sweden will make a really good Russian State, you could polish shoes at Red Square Litwin
 
Westphalian said:
Lithuania is such a small, de-populating state, that it's increasingly less viable. No need to do anything, its EU membership is stripping it of its young, its brightest, and making it an even less attractive place to live.

As for Belarus, your point is well made. Russia and Belarus share a Union State. It's a bit like speculating on whether Canada will be the US's next victim.
Click to expand...

But but but canada blocked our dairy for a long time, does in mean they plan to invade us?????:roll:
 
ex putler´s adviser Ilarionov predicts the same scenario
 
The same Andrey Ilarionov who lives in Washington, married a US citizen, and works for the Cato Institute?

A man who has been wrong on just about everything, and has regularly predicted Putin's imminent demise for over 10 years :roll:
 
sound like a good CV. not for your Olgino i know
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom