• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

These two Conservative MPs have blocked a law to ban upskirting in the UK

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,343
Reaction score
82,726
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
These two Conservative MPs have blocked a law to ban upskirting in the UK

befunky-collage-2.jpg

Christopher Chope and Philip Davies

6/15/18

LONDON — A cross-party bill to make the taking of photos up women's skirts a criminal offence has been blocked by two Conservative MPs. The bill, which is backed by both the government and opposition parties, seeks to make upskirting a criminal offence punishable by up to two years in prison. However, two Tory MPs, Philip Davies and Christopher Chope, spent several hours on Friday speaking in the House of Commons in a successful attempt to talk out the bill. Under archaic parliamentary rules, MPs are able to block bills brought forward by backbench MPs on Friday sessions if the debate extends beyond 2.30pm. Once the 2.30 deadline passed, MPs were asked whether they objected to the bill continuing its route through parliament after which Chope replied "object" thereby delaying its passage until July at the earliest.

"Upskirting is a depraved violation of privacy. It is outrageous that a single Member of Parliament has today been able to derail a much needed and universally supported change in the law." Both Chope and Davies have a long history of talking out backbench bills. In the past, they have talked out bills on everything from an attempt to give carers free hospital parking, to a bill designed to protect tenants from being unfairly evicted. In an interview with Business Insider in 2016 Davies said that he was only doing his job by delaying such bills. "That's the method we have in the rules," he said. "I don't set the rules but if you believe that a piece of legislation is bad and you want to block it then you've got to use the method that the rules allow to block it." Davies and Chope were condemned by MPs from across the Commons, including by some of their Conservative colleagues.

What gives? Are these two MPs perverts?

Related: BBC | May 'disappointed' at upskirting law block
 
No they are Libertarians basically. They are against poor knee Jerk reactionary law making. They have done it before.

And it is a procedure issue, so now the government and parliament actually have to debate the issue.

Of course optics wise it looks very bad.

Sendt fra min SM-N9005 med Tapatalk
 
~ They are against poor knee Jerk reactionary law making ~

Yeah, he'd never heard of "up skirting" before. All sorts of sides to this - he should be aware and those people proposing laws should make sure that all MPs are aware of all information and issues especially in Private Member's bills so that people asked to vote on laws that can get you sent to jail or worse actually know what's happening.
 
Yeah, he'd never heard of "up skirting" before. All sorts of sides to this - he should be aware and those people proposing laws should make sure that all MPs are aware of all information and issues especially in Private Member's bills so that people asked to vote on laws that can get you sent to jail or worse actually know what's happening.

It's bad optics that's for sure. (no pun intended)
 
Is it ok to still look at camel toes?
 
Last edited:
Chope is a serial procedural pedant. He is opposed to legislation being made without parliamentary debate. Weirdly, I find myself with him on this, although I can see how and why he's getting so much flak. I can't help but wonder whether there isn't a way in which 'upskirting' (of which I was completely unaware until this week) is already prosecutable under existing legislation.
 
Chope is a serial procedural pedant. He is opposed to legislation being made without parliamentary debate. Weirdly, I find myself with him on this, although I can see how and why he's getting so much flak. I can't help but wonder whether there isn't a way in which 'upskirting' (of which I was completely unaware until this week) is already prosecutable under existing legislation.

He's opposed to legislation being made without debate, but participated in undoing all of the Lords' Brexit amendments on the nod in less than a day, just last week.
 
He's opposed to legislation being made without debate, but participated in undoing all of the Lords' Brexit amendments on the nod in less than a day, just last week.

Yup, you're right. He's a Tory dinosaur and would have loved the opportunity to a liberal piece of legislation. Note my qualifier "on this". A Tory behaving hypocritically? Who'd've guessed?
 
Focusing on a small scale relatively minor problem whilst ignoring systemic child sexual abuse gangs in the UK's town and cities illustrates how lost the UK is - obsessed with virtue signalling and political correctness.

This is no triumph of prioritisation, but of course it shows how 'right on' the UK parliament is without running the risk of tackling a far more serious and ruinous problem.
 
Back
Top Bottom