• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Belgium- Muslim Political Party Seeks Islamic State- What Should be Done if Voters Agree?

What Should Belgium do if the Islamic Party Wins Elections and implements Sharia Law


  • Total voters
    11
Manc, you've never been right about anything you've commented on, in nearly 25k posts. I imagine you to be wearing your shoes on the wrong feet when I read your comments.

And you might say you tend to echo radical right hate websites that give only a snippet of anything resembling a fact and quite often are just pure crap onna cracker... :peace
 
No...there is no 'hyperbole aside'. Opposing the butchering of unborn children is not oppression of women...its creating the expectation of responsible choices (on both parties part) and the sanctity of human life. But any time you make the stupid comparison to opposing abortion as a response to Muslims that ****ing kill their BORN teen-aged daughters for wearing western clothes, or dating outside the religion or for being ****ing raped you make yourself and your entire argument look stupid.

As for 'womens rights' and the subject that 'likes' your comment...have him tell you all about Samia Shahid and Sinead Wooding. IF that is he can talk about those cases without running the risk of being thrown in jail in the UK for saying something that might offend somebody.

So... no hyperbole and then you launch on even more hyperbole? Do you even understand what I was talking about? You cannot seriously talk about protecting women's rights and equality and then deny them the right to choose what happens within their own bodies.

I say seriously because there is a huge lack of that in the US when discussion of women's rights over their own bodies is concerned.

:lamo

This is precisely why I seldom bother posting sources anymore. It doesnt matter. Give me the source. No source! Hah! You are wrong. SOurce? Well...so????

I posted the EXACT figures of the source YOU claimed you had read...and obviously...you didnt, cuz if you had you would know how silly you look right now and wouldnt have asked me for the source...that showed the exact figures I posted. So why the **** did you ask for the source and just admit beforehand that no matter what source I gave that supported the numbers, you were just going to say Well...so?

Europe is ****ed. Your leaders are bringing in Muslims as fast as they can get away with, you are absorbing illegal immigrants, and you are being out populated. It may take a few more generations (or a few less, depending on how many European women they can impregnate) but at some point in the not too distant future, Europe will simply be an extension of the Middle East. Hey...you know what? Ive been all throughout the middle east for many years. With any luck you will just become a Muslim state similar to UAE. But odds are pretty good that there will be plenty of pockets of fundamentalism there as well. You may not be alive to feel the impact, but Id bet money your kids will and your grandkids damn sure will. So buckle up, baby. You are all in for a bumpy ride. You think the terror attacks and **** they are experiencing with sex gangs are an issue now? You aint seen nothing yet. But why should you care? I'm SURE they will be loving and accepting of liberal ideals and philosophies and most importantly...lifestyles.

OK, after you wipe the spittle from your mouth, go read what I actually asked for in my post.

Then come back when you have an answer.
 
So... no hyperbole and then you launch on even more hyperbole? Do you even understand what I was talking about? You cannot seriously talk about protecting women's rights and equality and then deny them the right to choose what happens within their own bodies.

I say seriously because there is a huge lack of that in the US when discussion of women's rights over their own bodies is concerned.



OK, after you wipe the spittle from your mouth, go read what I actually asked for in my post.

Then come back when you have an answer.
SO you got no clothes......
 
SO you got no clothes......

Clothes has nothing to do with it - reading and comprehension does however I accept your confession you misread my question. I also accept that you realise you were part of the movement bent on removing the rights of women to control what happens with their own bodies.
 
Back
Top Bottom