• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Muslims are 84% of Child Sexual Predators in UK Sex Grooming Cases

Infinite Chaos said:
France is changing its definitions of rape to be in line with other European countries.
Click to expand...

I've only seen mention of a proposal to change the law, nothing says the law has actually changed.

Can you find a direct quote that states this please? Also do you mean the prosecution lawyers of the rapist or the defence lawyers of the rapist?
Click to expand...

" France prosecutors decided to only charge the man with sexual abuse of a minor (atteinte sexuel).

Their reasoning was that “there was no violence, no constraint, no threat, and no surprise" on the part of the man to justify the charge of rape. Essentially they judged that she had consented to the sexual encounter because she was not physically forced into the act."

https://www.thelocal.fr/20171113/fr...-13-after-man-acquitted-of-raping-11-year-old

In another notable case, a 22 year old man impregnated an 11 year old girl, and was acquitted of rape charges only a few months ago. So we're actually talking about 2 cases involving 11 year girls, one of which ended in acquittal by jury, and another one where the prosecutors decided against rape charges.

https://www.thelocal.fr/20171111/frenchman-acquitted-of-raping-11-year-old-schoolgirl
 
truthatallcost said:
Sarah was raped in a region where many of the residents are of non-EU background. Legal prosecutors called her a willing participant in sex with a 28 year old man.

This sounds a lot like Saudi Arabia to me!
Click to expand...

All rapes are to be condemned regardless of the race, colour or creed of perpetrator and victim. Nobody is denying that. You claim elsewhere that I "systematically excuse" rape gangs, yet when asked to find me the post where I've done so you can't. Funny that.

Sarah's rapist, like all men who rape women, evidently had a disgusting attitude towards women and sexuality. One like this perhaps:

truthatallcost said:
But you also know that men and women are very different when it comes to needing sexual release. I don't think you can relate to the feeling of being denied sexual release, because it's not the same thing for a woman.

If women took more time to learn about men's needs, they would be able to commiserate.
Click to expand...


You have still not named the areas of France where as you claimed, "women have to hide just like in Saudi Arabia" and I think we can all see that that's because you can't. You made a false claim - one of many. Repeating the same question dodge doesn't answer the question. You made that claim, NAME these areas. You can't. You've been challenged umpteen times and you either question dodge or you run away, as you did from that very thread (one you started by the way, one of many based on lies).

You use rapes committed by men who happen to be muslim to vent your Islamophobia while ignoring the many millions of decent muslims who've never raped in their lives. You start threads full of racist filth under the pretence that you are all lovey-dovily concerned for the welfare of young women, yet your true colours come through when you're in a discussion about rape that doesn't concern muslims. You are the greatest hypocrite in the history of DP.

Women hide in France? I'd probably want to hide if I lived in YOUR neighbourhood.
 
truthatallcost said:
Your posts are ridiculous, using two different conversations, and weaving them together without context.
Click to expand...

Considering you start threads a go-go about rape gangs, claiming to be concerned for the poor girls involved, I think the "other" discussion about rape was perfectly pertinent, and it helps to see what your views towards women are in the global context when there are no anti-muslim points to be scored. Your concern for the welfare of young women doesn't appear to be so evident.

Other posters will judge for themselves based on your posts in all the threads you contaminate. Other posters will also have noticed that once again you still have not named the areas of France where as you claimed, "women have to hide just like in Saudi Arabia" and being intelligent beings, they will be able to conclude why you can't.
 
truthatallcost said:
Your posts are ridiculous, using two different conversations, and weaving them together without context.
Click to expand...
Since context either never appears to exist in any of your posts or is usually the same old, where's the harm in mixing any of your utterings?
 
truthatallcost said:
I've only seen mention of a proposal to change the law, nothing says the law has actually changed.



" France prosecutors decided to only charge the man with sexual abuse of a minor (atteinte sexuel).

Their reasoning was that “there was no violence, no constraint, no threat, and no surprise" on the part of the man to justify the charge of rape. Essentially they judged that she had consented to the sexual encounter because she was not physically forced into the act."

https://www.thelocal.fr/20171113/fr...-13-after-man-acquitted-of-raping-11-year-old

In another notable case, a 22 year old man impregnated an 11 year old girl, and was acquitted of rape charges only a few months ago. So we're actually talking about 2 cases involving 11 year girls, one of which ended in acquittal by jury, and another one where the prosecutors decided against rape charges.

https://www.thelocal.fr/20171111/frenchman-acquitted-of-raping-11-year-old-schoolgirl
Click to expand...

So the man / men were still charged but with lesser crimes? No consolation if the crime is rape of a minor as most people would acknowledge what happened but not "throwing Sarah under the bus" as you tried to have it.

And as her for the wrong demographic, there are plenty of there instances where children in France have not been protected such as the case of British Photographer David Hamilton who photographed underage sexualised children for several books published throughout the western world.

You may want this to be a muslim only thing, you may want the perps to be muslims only but like your headline OP being misleading - so is your intention.
 
Infinite Chaos said:
So the man / men were still charged but with lesser crimes? No consolation if the crime is rape of a minor as most people would acknowledge what happened but not "throwing Sarah under the bus" as you tried to have it.


And as her for the wrong demographic, there are plenty of there instances where children in France have not been protected such as the case of British Photographer David Hamilton who photographed underage sexualised children for several books published throughout the western world.

You may want this to be a muslim only thing, you may want the perps to be muslims only but like your headline OP being misleading - so is your intention.
Click to expand...

What about my OP is misleading?
 
zyzygy said:
We're going to have regular mass shootings? Guns in schools? I hope not.
Click to expand...
With the OP title having repeatedly been shown as constituting a falsity more than a month ago at the earliest (possibly much earlier, I just can't be bothered to scroll back thru everything), one wonders why there's anything left to discuss, just because the OP links back to the same misleading opener, after having waited a while for awareness of the falsification to have supposedly waned.

It remains that the percentage stated in the OP shows (upon closer examination) to be incorrect, i.e. lower, and that the Muslim tag was a lie to begin with that even the source cited in the OP did not support.

All of which continues to answer the OP's question in post #233, no matter how often he cares to repeat it every couple of weeks.

It takes nothing from how disgusting the incidents in question were but that has been stated by practically everyone already.
 
Chagos said:
With the OP title having repeatedly been shown as constituting a falsity more than a month ago at the earliest (possibly much earlier, I just can't be bothered to scroll back thru everything), one wonders why there's anything left to discuss, just because the OP links back to the same misleading opener, after having waited a while for awareness of the falsification to have supposedly waned.

It remains that the percentage stated in the OP shows (upon closer examination) to be incorrect, i.e. lower, and that the Muslim tag was a lie to begin with that even the source cited in the OP did not support.

All of which continues to answer the OP's question in post #233, no matter how often he cares to repeat it every couple of weeks.

It takes nothing from how disgusting the incidents in question were but that has been stated by practically everyone already.
Click to expand...
When compared to the US the UK is a safer place for children.
 
truthatallcost said:
You're in for it now...

British-Pakistani researchers say 84% of grooming gang members are Asian: 'It's very important we talk about it' | The Independent

Grooming gangs of Muslim men failed to integrate into British society
Click to expand...

Because this report only talks about men in grooming gangs, not grooming in general. That is done mostly by white men (as a study has concluded) and so your claims fall far short of what your links state.

Your whole premise of this thread is fake conclusions about some accurate report regarding sex grooming gangs.
 
Peter King said:
Because this report only talks about men in grooming gangs, not grooming in general. That is done mostly by white men (as a study has concluded) and so your claims fall far short of what your links state.

Your whole premise of this thread is fake conclusions about some accurate report regarding sex grooming gangs.
Click to expand...

I wasn't going to bother spelling it out for him as he wouldn't take the effort to read it but thanks for saving me the typing. :thumbs:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom