• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The US sanctions bill is a timebomb for Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,313
Reaction score
82,703
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
The US sanctions bill is a timebomb for Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin


By Natalie Nougayrède
Tuesday 28 November 2017

trump_66.jpg


The issue is simmering now but it could well boil over by February, when a piece of US legislation including new, wide-ranging sanctions is likely to be passed. Donald Trump reluctantly signed the bill in August after it was nearly unanimously voted through by Congress – who wanted to prevent Trump from being able to unwind sanctions single-handedly, in the aftermath of US intelligence reports on Russian meddling in the election. The bill is emphatically called The Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions bill. Deep inside it, section 241 is the closest thing to a bombshell for Putin’s pyramidal power structure. Indeed, it stipulates that by February 2018, the US administration must submit a detailed report to Congress containing “the identification of the most significant oligarchs” in Russia, their relationship to Putin, evidence of any corruption, estimated net worth and sources of income. Anyone fitting the criteria could be subjected to personal sanctions, such as asset freezes and travel bans.

Not only would Russia’s wealthiest come under unprecedented American scrutiny but the same would happen to their family members, and anyone doing business with them in the west. As such, the scope of the bill goes much further than anything undertaken to date against members of Putin’s entourage. As sanctions go, and depending on the bill’s implementation, this has the potential to destabilize the regime, not just create unpleasantness for a few Putin insiders. The Trump administration has yet to fully implement the new sanctions. Indeed, there are many signs it is stalling, and reluctant to do so, but the clock counting down to that February deadline, just ahead of the Russian election, is ticking. Trump and Putin sit 5,000 miles apart, but they can hear it loud and clear.

The Russian oligarchs are scrambling to protect their assets. Trump will stall and direct Mnuchin (Treasury) to water this down as much as possible.

The major problem for Trump/Putin; The US Congress in-toto detests the Putin regime and views Putin's militaristic Russia as the greatest danger to US security.

They won't allow Trump to indefinitely drag his feet protecting Putin.
 
The US sanctions bill is a timebomb for Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin




The Russian oligarchs are scrambling to protect their assets. Trump will stall and direct Mnuchin (Treasury) to water this down as much as possible.

The major problem for Trump/Putin; The US Congress in-toto detests the Putin regime and views Putin's militaristic Russia as the greatest danger to US security.

They won't allow Trump to indefinitely drag his feet protecting Putin.

I doubt Trump would want to undo the sanctions, when he has understood the alternatives. That he hadn't was one of the problems of electing an inexperienced person to the job. We got, what we elected.
 
Speak for yourself. I never voted for Trump.

We all elected him. For whom you voted in vain might honor you. It doesn't absolve you of the group responsibility democracy means.
 
We all elected him. For whom you voted in vain might honor you. It doesn't absolve you of the group responsibility democracy means.

Baloney. No one is responsible for any politician they didn't vote for. That's just nonsensical.

The Russian oligarchs are getting nervous. Hiring lawyers and lobbyists in Washington.
 
Baloney. No one is responsible for any politician they didn't vote for. That's just nonsensical.

The Russian oligarchs are getting nervous. Hiring lawyers and lobbyists in Washington.

If you waste a vote, you are one of those that didn't care enough to use the vote to stop him. Democracy is not about feel good, but about acting to get, what you want. If you act in such a way as to get a result you don't want....
 
If you waste a vote, you are one of those that didn't care enough to use the vote to stop him. Democracy is not about feel good, but about acting to get, what you want. If you act in such a way as to get a result you don't want....

Your answer does not remotely follow from what Rogue Valley said. Where did he say anything about wasting a vote? Again, thinking you are in some intellectual upper echelon is delusional, on your part.
 
If you waste a vote, you are one of those that didn't care enough to use the vote to stop him. Democracy is not about feel good, but about acting to get, what you want. If you act in such a way as to get a result you don't want....

That's a load of joG crap. If I didn't vote for Trump I'm not responsible for Trump. Period.
 
That's a load of joG crap. If I didn't vote for Trump I'm not responsible for Trump. Period.

Oh, but you were, if you are allowed to vote. That vote was one of the ones missing and the people you didn't persuade to vote for a candidate that could beat Trump instead of ones that hadn't a chance or stayed home were missing. That is the way group decision works. You are responsible.
 
Your answer does not remotely follow from what Rogue Valley said. Where did he say anything about wasting a vote? Again, thinking you are in some intellectual upper echelon is delusional, on your part.

I realize lots of folks do not want to take responsibility. And IQs aside, I have done professional work on decision making rules in large and small groups. That doesn't require "intellectual upper echelon" qualities. It only takes a little work and math skills. If you walk that walk, you'll see, what I meant.
 
I realize lots of folks do not want to take responsibility. And IQs aside, I have done professional work on decision making rules in large and small groups. That doesn't require "intellectual upper echelon" qualities. It only takes a little work and math skills. If you walk that walk, you'll see, what I meant.

I know what I'm talking about, and I do not pretend like yourself, to be something that you clearly (from the irrelevant) posts, are not.
 
I know what I'm talking about, and I do not pretend like yourself, to be something that you clearly (from the irrelevant) posts you spurt out, are not.

I'm impressed.
 
Back
Top Bottom