• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Vorsprung durch Angst

So taxes don't pay for that?

If they did, then 35% of American students would not be graduating with a student-loan debt of $35K to repay.

From here (Time, Jan. 2016): Why the Student Loan Crisis Is Even Worse Than People Think - excerpt:

Average student loan debt at graduation has been growing steadily over the last two decades. In 1993-94, about half of bachelor’s degree recipients graduated with debt, averaging a little more than $10,000. This year, more than two-thirds of college graduates graduated with debt, and their average debt at graduation was about $35,000, tripling in two decades.

Student loan debt is increasing because government grants and support for postsecondary education have failed to keep pace with increases in college costs. This has shifted much of the burden of paying for college from the federal and state governments to families. The government no longer carries its fair share of college costs, even though it gets a big increase in income tax revenue from college graduates.

Since family income has been flat since 2000, students must either borrow more to pay for college or enroll in lower-cost colleges. That shift in enrollment, from private colleges to public colleges and from four-year colleges to two-year ones, has also been responsible for a decline in bachelor’s degree attainment among low- and moderate-income students.

Not to worry. Donald Dork is going to dip into his own wealth to fix the problem ...

PS: Betsy DeVos picked for Trump's education secretary - excerpt:
President-elect Donald Trump tapped Betsy DeVos, a top Republican donor and school choice activist, to head the Department of Education, the Trump transition team announced Wednesday.

Trump met with the billionaire donor and conservative activist this weekend at his golf club in New Jersey, where he hosted a slew of potential Cabinet appointees. Trump offered DeVos the position on Tuesday and she accepted the same day, a senior Trump transition official told CNN.

"Betsy DeVos is a brilliant and passionate education advocate," Trump said in a statement Wednesday. "Under her leadership we will reform the US education system and break the bureaucracy that is holding our children back so that we can deliver world-class education and school choice to all families."
 
Last edited:
That is mostly because we do not work like the US system of education, most have a higher vocational degree rather than going to a tertiary education. That is because we have that option. Why should people go for a university education when they can get a better job option if they go for a vocational education at a higher degree.

Well, good for the Netherlands.

I keep harping about "education" being a necessary qualification for a "good job". It also makes for more "wholesome people".

Besides, when push-comes-shove in any economic downturn, it is the lower-level jobs that go. (That's almost a law it has been seen so often.)

But, maybe the Netherlands is different. Anyway, comparing Holland with the US is like comparing melons with cherries - both fruit, but not quite the same ...
 
Trump goes on about Germany selling to many cars and other countries products ... does he feel the same about US companies which have a virtual monopolies in other areas around the globe like in soft drinks Coca Cola and Pepsi in soft drinks and fast food chains like MsDonalds, Burger King and KFC 3 of the biggest fast food chains in the world
 
Trump goes on about Germany selling to many cars and other countries products ... does he feel the same about US companies which have a virtual monopolies in other areas around the globe like in soft drinks Coca Cola and Pepsi in soft drinks and fast food chains like MsDonalds, Burger King and KFC 3 of the biggest fast food chains in the world

The Trump language is often more difficult to decipher than that of Chinese.

He's talking to the people who actually got him elected in "special states". One must understand that the popular vote in the US does not really win the election. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote (by a healthy margin of 2% of the total) but lost the election in an archaic institution called the Electoral College.

The electoral college is the infamous manner that gives certain low population states a higher voting potential.

Here is a reasonable explanation of that unfairness, somewhat dated but not as badly as is the Electoral College itself: The Electoral College, Unfair From Day One - excerpt:
In 1787, as the Constitution was being drafted in Philadelphia, James Wilson of Pennsylvania proposed direct election of the president. But James Madison of Virginia worried that such a system would hurt the South, which would have been outnumbered by the North in a direct election system. The creation of the Electoral College got around that: it was part of the deal that Southern states, in computing their share of electoral votes, could count slaves (albeit with a two-fifths discount), who of course were given none of the privileges of citizenship. Virginia emerged as the big winner, with more than a quarter of the electors needed to elect a president. A free state like Pennsylvania got fewer electoral votes even though it had approximately the same free population.

The Constitution's pro-Southern bias quickly became obvious. For 32 of the Constitution's first 36 years, a white slaveholding Virginian occupied the presidency. Thomas Jefferson, for example, won the election of 1800 against John Adams from Massachusetts in a race where the slavery skew of the Electoral College was the decisive margin of victory.

The system's gender bias was also obvious. In a direct presidential election, any state that chose to enfranchise its women would have automatically doubled its clout. Under the Electoral College, however, a state had no special incentive to expand suffrage -- each got a fixed number of electoral votes, regardless of how many citizens were allowed to vote.

The above sort of chicanery (such as allowing the headcount of slaves contribute to the total number of votes in the Electoral College for any given state.

The plain fact of the matter is that the electoral college is not proportional. That is, the number of electors per voting population is NOT EQUAL for all states. In California, each 300,000 voters give the state 1 Electoral Vote. In key smaller states, half that amount are necessary to give the state one Electoral Vote.

The numbers are patently unfair, and undemocratic*, which is why the Electoral College should be abandoned. Along with Gerrymandering, which carves up voting boundaries to favor one or other of the two parties.

These devices make America far less a "fair democracy" than most Americans think today ...

*A democracy exists only where representatives to any legislature (national or sub-national) are determined by the number of fair votes for any given candidate.
 
Well, good for the Netherlands.

I keep harping about "education" being a necessary qualification for a "good job". It also makes for more "wholesome people".

Besides, when push-comes-shove in any economic downturn, it is the lower-level jobs that go. (That's almost a law it has been seen so often.)

But, maybe the Netherlands is different. Anyway, comparing Holland with the US is like comparing melons with cherries - both fruit, but not quite the same ...

Sure, that's why our universities are filled with crackpot leftists.
 
Sure, that's why our universities are filled with crackpot leftists.
A perfect case for demanding that taxi drivers, barbers and those that serve in bars do their jobs IN SILENCE. :2razz:
 
Back
Top Bottom