• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BBC and Islam[W:200]

Sure, but it's not a good look.

Let them be heard. There is no danger of the Fourth Reich starting here.
Silence them.. and it feeds their "real threat to the establishment" narrative. "The voice they don't want you to hear".

There is no point giving them a platform just to ridicule them. If you give it them, let them speak.
 
coldjoint said:
Interesting. Is it right to change an identity because of the crime? The BBC says yes.

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
Click to expand...

You can be a Kashmir Muslim Indian athlete. And if he is being refused entry to the US because he is a Muslim from Kashmir, than it is logical that the BBC reports that issue. And if he is arrested (denying he has done it) than his Muslim background it hardly the reason of his crime. Sadly in India loads of men, loads of them non-Muslims have a horrendous attitude towards women and their rights not to be raped/molested/killed, and with that issue in mind why is it such an issue that they correctly identify him as an Indian athlete. I do not see the issue.

The first story has everything to do with his religious identity, the second story (if true) has nothing to do with his religion, again, I do not see the issue of making this about the BBC and Islam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom