- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 26,719
- Reaction score
- 6,278
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Now what possible motivation would exist for a nationwide attempt at underreporting sex crimes by a staggering 25%? Hmmm....
~ So why would anyone trust ONS figures about crime? ~
~ You'd be better off with independent sites than trusting ONS ~
Now what possible motivation would exist for a nationwide attempt at underreporting sex crimes by a staggering 25%? Hmmm....
You didn't read your links. The fiddling was by the police, not the ONS.
So, I'd be better off with a .com website and where do they get their figures from if not the same police?
You'd have to provide accurate sources for your claim before it deserves any merit and then show me where your fake website gets it's figures from.
And you never answered my question regarding where ONS gets their data on crime Clever.
~ Did the investigation ever determine why police were lying about crime numbers?
~ You could at least look at it, millions of others are apparently, due to not trusting their government one iota.
~ Looks legit to me ~
Jimmy Saville is the gift that keeps on giving though, isn't he? Been dead 5 years now and still providing evidence why the UK can tolerate a few dozen sex gangs preying on Britain's young. Quite a legacy you've made for old Jimmy! Still annoying children from the great beyond.
It isn't just Jimmy Savile though: Rolf Harris (white Australian), Garry Glitter (white British), John Leslie (white British), Dave Lee Travis (white British) etc. etc. By your logic, we suspect all UK entertainers 1970 - 2000 of sexual assault. That would be stupid however. And yet when somebody commits a crime and they just happen to be muslim, your prejudices come out.
~ Members of parliament have estimated their number of victims in the UK to possibly reach as high as a million girls. ~
Yes, in a general inquiry into sexual abuse of children. You've conflated in muslim gangs to try and make a mountain out of a molehill.
Rotherham and other incidents with gangs of paedophile muslims is bad enough but trying to use all the victims of all sexual abuse as a way of blaming muslims is reprehensible.
Yeah, I have the Facebook of one of these men, so forget trying to pretend that they don't exist.
The inflammatory nature of this ensures that 'respectable' sites would never publish the pictures. These are the same assholes who report day after day about new terrorist plots, attacks, and migrant crime, then turn around and say we need open borders if we want to be 'humane', completely ignoring the inhumanity involved in unleashing terror and sexual abuse on the population of highly peaceful nations.
It isn't just Jimmy Savile though: Rolf Harris (white Australian), Garry Glitter (white British), John Leslie (white British), Dave Lee Travis (white British) etc. etc. By your logic, we suspect all UK entertainers 1970 - 2000 of sexual assault. That would be stupid however. And yet when somebody commits a crime and they just happen to be muslim, your prejudices come out.
"Grooming" young girls for sex has long been big business in some areas of the world. If you are interested, talk to your travel agent. They cater to a high end clientele, so it will be expensive.
White men doing sex tourism is just economics. Those girls and boys would just be subsisting in rural communities if they hadn't been brought to the city to do some good honest work.
...Personally, I think white kids from rough areas today in England don't stand a chance. They are highly likely to be targeted by foreign men for sex, and then thrown under the bus by white Brits who are middle or upper class. I've heard from spineless upper class Brits who actually said the kids were to blame in this.
White men doing sex tourism is just economics. Those girls and boys would just be subsisting in rural communities if they hadn't been brought to the city to do some good honest work.
You're opinion has always been that this is a 'mole hill' from the first discussion we had years ago, which mirrors the opinion of the Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Child Sex Exploitation, the Labour Party, and Children’s Services, the Safeguarding Board, and South Yorkshire Police.
Why do only 26% of Britons trust their government?
Is that a common viewpoint in the UK?
Is that a common viewpoint in the UK?
Members of parliament have estimated their number of victims in the UK to possibly reach as high as a million girls..
Police and social agencies in the UK have been shown to attempt a cover up of some of the abuse, which makes them accomplices in my opinion. .
Nobody has disputed that.Victims of childhood sexual abuse are at a higher risk of drug abuse and suicide..
If you think a few gay has-been celebrities from the 70's somehow negates the very current situation in the UK regarding Muslim sex gangs, then that just indicates cluelessness on your behalf..
terminate all males that are over the age of 12. Home grown included, of course.
That would have prevented Jimmy Savile, for instance.
Really, remove all male Pakistani citizens from the UK over the age of 12? There are 1.2 million British Pakistanis, so presumably around some ~400,000 of them are males over the age of 12. So in other words, the vile actions of 6 men should remove the rights of ~400,000 other men who've never been convicted of a crime?
You're just dressing up "Let's screw over all foreigners!" with the flimsiest of logic.
I guess I should have added a sarcasm icon or satire warning.Really, remove all male Pakistani citizens from the UK over the age of 12? There are 1.2 million British Pakistanis, so presumably around some ~400,000 of them are males over the age of 12. So in other words, the vile actions of 6 men should remove the rights of ~400,000 other men who've never been convicted of a crime?
You're just dressing up "Let's screw over all foreigners!" with the flimsiest of logic.
I guess not everybody understands my mean humour.The poster you quoted doesn't think the way you think he does... he is making the same point as you.
I guess I should have added a sarcasm icon or satire warning.
Did it escape you that I referred to ALL males (and that Jimmy Savile, as far as we know, wasn't' Muslim)?
If we assume that around half the population of Britain is male and would thus be somewhere at 30 million, we just have to pick out the under-twelves and kill the rest.
400,000 my bloody foot, we'd still be in the millions.
Now what do I have to add to raise doubts over this being a serious proposal?:mrgreen:
I dunno about "we" (well, truth told, I do) but "some" clearly get so aroused over the concept that I'm keeping an umbrella readily at hand.:mrgreen:Touché. I missed the Savile reference. To be fair, it's not like people weren't literally expressing the same idea as you were pretending to, and I'd raise the same point to them as I did to your sarcastic argument: Are we really going to start blaming whole groups of people because of a few deviant members?
~ Even TAAC fell for it and Sweden liked his "rebuttal" ~
Heck, all one need do is go back to (my) post # 27 and then watch TAAC's wiggly squirm in # 37 (I have the proof but can't post it on here because................blah, blah, blah), to discern the crap level of what gets presented here constantly.No surprise there. If one drops a dogt**d the other would like it.