• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UK- Pakistani Rapists Stripped of Citizenship, Ordered Deported

Erm, so you're claiming the Office of National Statistics aznd its database is fake too?

I never said that ONS is fake, but tell me, where does ONS get their crime data from?

Thanks, never heard of this website before. Whose statistics does it use? Does it reference the Govt Office of National Statistics?

They appear to be independent, and not tied to Her Majesties Holy Alliance of Bureaucratic Red Tape. Is that problematic?
 
Do you have a source for those pictures please?
Viral all over the net with the usual sites, from barenakedislam, stormfront via pamela (you've guessed who) to muslimissues etc.

Most (not all) claim to have acquired the photos and an interview that was conducted with the parents of the kids depicted from a site which is meanwhile defunct (expired 11 months ago) but has a review of:


  • This website doesn't own an SSL Certificate, your data might be compromised.
  • This website doesn't have too many visitors.
  • This website doesn't have any trust records. Might be a new website.
  • Be careful! The owner of this domain is using a service to hide their personal/company details.

I won't name it and certainly not supply any link either since even the domain may (or may not) still provide security risks. But I can supply the (original) site name and server details privately (if desired and still current).
 
Viral all over the net with the usual sites, from barenakedislam, stormfront via pamela (you've guessed who) to muslimissues etc.

Most (not all) claim to have acquired the photos and an interview that was conducted with the parents of the kids depicted from a site which is meanwhile defunct (expired 11 months ago) but has a review of:


  • This website doesn't own an SSL Certificate, your data might be compromised.
  • This website doesn't have too many visitors.
  • This website doesn't have any trust records. Might be a new website.
  • Be careful! The owner of this domain is using a service to hide their personal/company details.

I won't name it and certainly not supply any link either since even the domain may (or may not) still provide security risks. But I can supply the (original) site name and server details privately (if desired and still current).


So nothing from a reliable source with links to the actual social media accounts and verification of who these people actually are. Just random pictures with any identifying factors blacked out.

Propoganda at its finest.
 
So nothing from a reliable source with links to the actual social media accounts and verification of who these people actually are. Just random pictures with any identifying factors blacked out.

Propoganda at its finest.

The fact that this has happened on a grand scale in the UK makes it more than propaganda. Islam brings trouble and keeps people up all night making excuses for it.
 
So nothing from a reliable source with links to the actual social media accounts and verification of who these people actually are. Just random pictures with any identifying factors blacked out.

Propoganda at its finest.
Well, seeing how it had been 3 hours since your query and seeing how the addressee must have seen it, I thought I'd jump in.

One must also bear in mind that the posting of fakes appears to be a hobby of the poster, although I'd credit him with being not all that bothered with verifications, certainly not to the extent of realizing what he's actually spewing forth.

The resulting image, however, IS verifiable.:mrgreen:
 
The fact that this has happened on a grand scale in the UK makes it more than propaganda. Islam brings trouble and keeps people up all night making excuses for it.
The OP has well sourced pictures of scumbags who are guilty of heinous crimes. No issues at all with that and no issues with those being shared.

Where are the sources for the other pictures I have quoted. Who are these people. What are their names. Where is the proof from reputable sources showing these people are guilty of what they are being accused of. Why is the social media account names of those accounts and those commenting blacked out?

Would you like claims made against you without evidence to support whilst your pictures are dragged all over the internet?
 
The fact that this has happened on a grand scale in the UK makes it more than propaganda. Islam brings trouble and keeps people up all night making excuses for it.
and you reckon the mention of the terms "reliable source" and "verifications" is the queue for YOU to turn up?

So YOU can make excuses for fake news?

Well okay, this is after all also about images. Enjoy the one you're showing.:roll:
 
and you reckon the mention of the terms "reliable source" and "verifications" is the queue for YOU to turn up?

So YOU can make excuses for fake news?

Well okay, this is after all also about images. Enjoy the one you're showing.:roll:

Nothing fake about grooming underage girls. It happens and people should know it does and that is not a crime under Islamic law so it can be prevented.
 
The majority of naturalized Brits will never lose citizenship, and removing child predators just makes sense for society.



They should be punished far more than a few years in prison. They should be deported to a deserted island somewhere.

Yes, and something more than their citizenship should be removed. But of course this is all just fun in Pakistan and we mustn't offend their culture. We must welcome diversity.
 
So nothing from a reliable source with links to the actual social media accounts and verification of who these people actually are. Just random pictures with any identifying factors blacked out.

Propoganda at its finest.

I have links to their Facebook, but didn't want to post them for concern of infractions.

The pictures have been removed from these accounts, but they still exist.
 
Viral all over the net with the usual sites, from barenakedislam, stormfront via pamela (you've guessed who) to muslimissues etc.

Most (not all) claim to have acquired the photos and an interview that was conducted with the parents of the kids depicted from a site which is meanwhile defunct (expired 11 months ago) but has a review of:


  • This website doesn't own an SSL Certificate, your data might be compromised.
  • This website doesn't have too many visitors.
  • This website doesn't have any trust records. Might be a new website.
  • Be careful! The owner of this domain is using a service to hide their personal/company details.

I won't name it and certainly not supply any link either since even the domain may (or may not) still provide security risks. But I can supply the (original) site name and server details privately (if desired and still current).

Yeah, I have the Facebook of one of these men, so forget trying to pretend that they don't exist.

The inflammatory nature of this ensures that 'respectable' sites would never publish the pictures. These are the same assholes who report day after day about new terrorist plots, attacks, and migrant crime, then turn around and say we need open borders if we want to be 'humane', completely ignoring the inhumanity involved in unleashing terror and sexual abuse on the population of highly peaceful nations.
 
Yeah, I have the Facebook of one of these men, so forget trying to pretend that they don't exist.

The inflammatory nature of this ensures that 'respectable' sites would never publish the pictures. These are the same assholes who report day after day about new terrorist plots, attacks, and migrant crime, then turn around and say we need open borders if we want to be 'humane', completely ignoring the inhumanity involved in unleashing terror and sexual abuse on the population of highly peaceful nations.
Frankly I've long since become leery of your sources, be they actually linked or claimed as being held.

Your track record doesn't shine.
 
Frankly I've long since become leery of your sources, be they actually linked or claimed as being held.

Your track record doesn't shine.

And Islam's does.:lamo
 
Frankly I've long since become leery of your sources, be they actually linked or claimed as being held.

Your track record doesn't shine.

Thanks for participating in my thread :mrgreen:
 
Where are the sources for the other pictures I have quoted. Who are these people. What are their names. Where is the proof from reputable sources showing these people are guilty of what they are being accused of. Why is the social media account names of those accounts and those commenting blacked out?

How does that 35 year old looking man innocently end up cuddling on a couch with 2 girls who appear to be 11 years old? That look like normal behavior to you? And yet in a thread about old men molesting children who probably looked just like these Finnish girls, we have people making excuses for what's right in front of their eyes.

Would you like claims made against you without evidence to support whilst your pictures are dragged all over the internet?

The men haven't removed their Facebook profiles, the one blonde girl has. I can assume who was more damaged by the relationship.
 
How does that 35 year old looking man innocently end up cuddling on a couch with 2 girls who appear to be 11 years old? That look like normal behavior to you? And yet in a thread about old men molesting children who probably looked just like these Finnish girls, we have people making excuses for what's right in front of their eyes.



The men haven't removed their Facebook profiles, the one blonde girl has. I can assume who was more damaged by the relationship.

I'm not seeing anyone making excuses for legitimately sourced heinous behaviour such as those displayed in your OP. To suggest otherwise is inaccurate.

Are you suggesting that asking for legitimate sources for the other pictures you posted is inappropriate?

Are you suggesting that a man cuddling with 2 young girls is not normal behaviour at all or only in this case because the man is Muslim (bearing in mind you have still refused to post legitimate sources confirming inappropriate behavior)?

You're not making much sense here. Be clear.
 
I never said that ONS is fake, but tell me, where does ONS get their crime data from?

https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus

Basically if your source doesn't use ONS then it's fake or heavily tainted by bias, like many of your sources in these forums.

They appear to be independent, and not tied to Her Majesties Holy Alliance of Bureaucratic Red Tape. Is that problematic?

Stormfront is independent and not tied to Her Majesties Holy Alliance of Bureaucratic Red Tape. Do you not understand why that may be problematic?


And how many in Europe? In the US?

Now compare with right wing shootings in the US since 9/11
 
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus

Basically if your source doesn't use ONS then it's fake or heavily tainted by bias, like many of your sources in these forums.

Interesting IC, you offer a generic link with no specifics provided about the information I asked you for. You may be a fine candidate for employment with said bureaucratic agency.



Stormfront is independent and not tied to Her Majesties Holy Alliance of Bureaucratic Red Tape. Do you not understand why that may be problematic?

I don't visit Stormfront. Plenty of white offenders on that website I linked you to, have you looked at it?
 
Interesting IC, you offer a generic link with no specifics provided about the information I asked you for. You may be a fine candidate for employment with said bureaucratic agency.

You didn't read the link. No surprise there.

Let me try a different way - in the US, what is your official statistics gathering agency? Ya'know - the people who count how many citizens / industrial growth / etc etc?

When you answer that question, you'll understand what the link I gave you was.

Oh yeah, I said I ain't clicking a fake .com site pretending to have a database on UK data.
 
You didn't read the link. No surprise there.


OK, ONS is the executive office of the UK Statistics Authority.

Crime data that ONS uses is culled from police figures on crime, correct?

We've got a problem there mate;

" The gold-standard "national statistics" status has been withdrawn from police recorded crime figures following repeated allegations that some of the quarterly published figures have been subject to "a degree of fiddling".

The allegations have included claims that the Metropolitan police have understated sexual offences by as much as 25%. MPs have heard allegations that fiddling techniques have included downgrading offences to less serious crimes or persuading victims not to make a complaint, while in some cases crimes were only recorded if they were solved. Other incidents were kept completely off the books if an offender could not be traced, they have been told."


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jan/15/police-crime-figures-status-claims-fiddling

Well maybe it was all an honest mistake, right? Wrong.

" The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) made repeated attempts to silence a whistleblower who exposed the widespread manipulation of crime statistics, it has emerged.

Documents seen by the Guardian show that senior officers made three separate attempts to stop PC James Patrick speaking out over the course of less than five months. In one letter, they went so far as to insist he be barred from having any contact with any member of the public."


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/apr/13/metropolitan-police-whistleblower-crime-figures

So why would anyone trust ONS figures about crime?



Oh yeah, I said I ain't clicking a fake .com site pretending to have a database on UK data.

You'd be better off with independent sites than trusting ONS :thumbs: Let's be clear, your government couldn't give a rats ass about producing accurate crime figures. They are only concerned with appearances . All government agencies like ONS have a strong element of bull****, you know it as well as I do.
 
Back
Top Bottom