- Joined
- May 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,250
- Reaction score
- 763
- Location
- Los Angels, USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
1. Obviously, we agree to disagree in this one.1. that is nonsense, stating what is obvious is not name calling.
2. no, vehement disagreement makes the thread because almost all people think the views are totally nonsensical.
3.. the so called feminist government is only something from the last few years and calling it feminist because it voices equal rights is not a problem IMHO. The problem is not equality for women it is inequality for women for women and only the idiot right wing in Sweden according to the article you submitted, do not include feminism/equal rights for women in their party program, it is not an issue in Sweden except for the extreme right.
2. For you, emotion no reason, is what make the thread, and the views are “totally” meaningless. Certainly views are important for the Debate Politics forum, due to the fact that the number of times a thread is viewed indicates whether a discussion topic is broadly captivating among people. More views means the content of the thread become more influential, popular. This is the main reason the forum has a column to keep track of views, which is used to determine the activity of the thread.
3. State feminism is not a new concept, since prior to 1995 had been used in Scandinavian countries to describe public policies that promote gender equality. Your rant against the “the idiot right wing in Sweden according to the article”, has nothing to do with the article. I am interested to read Sweden Democrats party program. I would appreciated if you provide a link to SD party program.
By the way, you have not provide a link that confirm your statement of the percent of women that voted by each of the parties. Nor do you have provided references, sources or links that validate the statistics you have posted about middle-eastern men.