• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sweden's leading shopping mall is deemed a no-go zone[W:18]

Re: Sweden's leading shopping mall is deemed a no-go zone

The source is expressed.se, not RT. See the link in post #4.

The source is being represented in a fraudulent manner.
 
Re: Sweden's leading shopping mall is deemed a no-go zone

If this shopping mall was a no go zone then how come there are pictures of people and the police in such a "no go zone"?

It is a clear hatchet job and poor journalism by RT, ------------------>
Total mystery how people still cite that disinformation outlet designed to try and destabilize Western democracies. It's the successor of the KGB's Department A (Dezinformatsiya) and one would think that the people in rags even as stupid as the Fail and Express would give it a wide berth.

But then I guess that pursuit of agenda justifies anything, even bathing in vats of dung.:roll:

Heck, if one wants to make a case against immigrants, darn well make it. There's plenty to get one's teeth into and to then spin into any direction one cars to go.

No need to compromise own credibility (yeah, I know, laughable in case of those two UK rags) from the get-go.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sweden's leading shopping mall is deemed a no-go zone

The source is being represented in a fraudulent manner.

The original source was expressen.se
 
Re: Sweden's leading shopping mall is deemed a no-go zone

Total mystery how people still cite that disinformation outlet designed to try and destabilize Western democracies. It's the successor of the KGB's Department A (Dezinformatsiya) and one would think that the people in rags even as stupid as the Fail and Express would give it a wide berth.

But then I guess that pursuit of agenda justifies anything, even bathing in vats of dung.:roll:

Heck, if one wants to make a case against immigrants, darn well make it. There's plenty to get one's teeth into and to then spin into any direction one cars to go.

No need to compromise own credibility (yeah, I know, laughable in case of those two UK rags) from the get-go.

News like that tells us who is destabilizing Western democracies, not the other way around. Or do you think importing an intolerant culture has a stabilizing effect?

Seems you do. It could be why so many do not listen to you.
 
Re: Sweden's leading shopping mall is deemed a no-go zone

News like that tells us who is destabilizing Western democracies, not the other way around. Or do you think importing an intolerant culture has a stabilizing effect?

Seems you do. It could be why so many do not listen to you.
Seeing how you show to have no idea on what I raised in the post you quote and seeing how you prefer, rather than address its content, to go mantra-ing your single item one trick pony line again, you're dismissed.
 
Re: Sweden's leading shopping mall is deemed a no-go zone

Seeing how you show to have no idea on what I raised in the post you quote and seeing how you prefer, rather than address its content, to go mantra-ing your single item one trick pony line again, you're dismissed.

You dismiss no one here. Your condescending replies are anything but civil.
 
Re: Sweden's leading shopping mall is deemed a no-go zone

# 55, last two words (three actually, when leaving out the abbreviation).

Actually can be applied to last three posts (4 including this one) as having absolutely no information value relevant to topic.
 
Re: Sweden's leading shopping mall is deemed a no-go zone

The original source was expressen.se

Yes, and the OP's tabloid is misrepresenting that source.

That source shows a decrease in violent crime. OP's source claims a "spike in violent crime."

On the same page now?
 
Back
Top Bottom