• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Microsoft says Russia-linked hackers exploiting Windows flaw

Lafayette

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
9,594
Reaction score
2,072
Location
France
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Title of article, obtainable here.

Given the billions that Microsoft makes every year, I frankly find it amazing that Microsoft cant hire a bunch of hackers (in Russia) whose sole objective in life would be to find "holes" in its software paying them American salaries.

And why is nobody hacking Russian email-agents? Or, is it that they are but the fact never is made public.

Yeah, it must be that.

(I wonder who Putin is dating now that he's divorced ... ;^)
 
Given the billions that Microsoft makes every year, I frankly find it amazing that Microsoft cant hire a bunch of hackers (in Russia) whose sole objective in life would be to find "holes" in its software paying them American salaries.
They do.
They do hire security researchers in the USA, Russia and other countries (including many repented criminals).
They do have public rewards programs for third-party researchers, hackers, etc.
They do purchase vulnerabilities from criminals auctioning them.
They do purchase vulnerabilities from gray brokers who work with governments and corporations.
They do use various automated tools based on mathematical proofs or heuristics to detect vulnerabilities.
They do organize heavy security reviews to make sure that every line of code is re-re-read by various programmers.
They do implement processes to make sure that every employee understands how security problems appear, how to avoid them, and their consequences.
They do offer assistance and tools to third-party vendors, especially device manufacturers who have to provide drivers, to ensure that they do make a good job.


It is not enough. Vulnerabilities and bugs remain in your Windows, your Android, your iOS, your ATM, your TV, your coffee maker, your car and plane's autopilots, governments' nuclear cases, ... They exist both in the software, in the hardware and in the human organizations. They always will.

You can try to decrease the probability of occurrence with various methodologies like the ones used by Microsoft. For some devices you can try to keep things minimalist by not optimizing and removing features (no user interface, no network, ..).

But the only real solution is to expect that things will go wrong and make it tolerable. Any data on a connected computer will eventually become public.


And why is nobody hacking Russian email-agents?
Because it would be illegal and employees could be jailed. Besides Russia could sue MS in an US court and win.

Because MS has nothing to gain from it.

Because it would be a very bad PR move: people do not want to see corporations attack countries. Maybe you think it would be fine if they targeted Russia, but Russian and Chinese customers will think otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Title of article, obtainable here.

Given the billions that Microsoft makes every year, I frankly find it amazing that Microsoft cant hire a bunch of hackers (in Russia) whose sole objective in life would be to find "holes" in its software paying them American salaries.

And why is nobody hacking Russian email-agents? Or, is it that they are but the fact never is made public.

Yeah, it must be that.

(I wonder who Putin is dating now that he's divorced ... ;^)
Haven't you heard? The CIA is definitely launching a hacking offensive to defend the U.S.! Our government made a big deal about it! I suspect it's all a bunch of hot air. Our government's primary focus is to spy on it's own citizens, not defend us.
 
Most certainly they do hire hackers to find the holes in the OS.

The term "white hat" in Internet slang refers to an ethical computer hacker, or a computer security expert, who specializes in penetration testing and in other testing methodologies to ensure the security of an organization's information systems.[SUP][1][/SUP] Ethical hacking is a term coined by IBM meant to imply a broader category than just penetration testing.[SUP][2][/SUP] Contrasted with black hat, a malicious hacker, the name comes from Western films, where heroic and antagonistic cowboys might traditionally wear a white and a black hat respectively.[SUP][3][/SUP]
White-hat hackers may also work in teams called "sneakers",[SUP][4][/SUP] red teams, or tiger teams.[SUP][5][/SUP]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hat_(computer_security)
 
Haven't you heard? The CIA is definitely launching a hacking offensive to defend the U.S.! Our government made a big deal about it! I suspect it's all a bunch of hot air. Our government's primary focus is to spy on it's own citizens, not defend us.

Under Obama, I believe it. Because the American citizen is less trustworthy than the refugees, Europeans and just about anyone else. Hate America first.
 
Haven't you heard? The CIA is definitely launching a hacking offensive to defend the U.S.! I suspect it's all a bunch of hot air. Our government's primary focus is to spy on it's own citizens, not defend us.

Me too!

The American people are not a particularly "secretive" people, unless the subject matter is money and the context is business.

In fact, the rich and super-rich love to have their Wealth published in the press. After all, it is considered an "achievement". (How they got is always a bit less covered in the press - which is why the Dork will not publish information regarding taxes.)

Anyway, I keep harping about Social Justice. Never did I think it could be measured. I am pleased to have found that it can.

Uncle Sam does not do all that well in the ranking, but here it is: Social Justice Ranking
 
Last edited:
Anyway, I keep harping about Social Justice. Never did I think it could be measured. I am pleased to have found that it can.
You can always measure stuff, the devil is in the details, in what you do actually measure.

But it is indeed likely that the USA fare poorly in most of measurements of social justice. Although I fail to see the relation with Microsoft, unless you think they made Americans poorer, which seems absurd. Or unless you think it would have been better that their stockholders did not become wealthier in order to not widen the gap, even though it benefited to the country, which seems dubious.

In fact, the rich and super-rich love to have their Wealth published in the press.
Not all of them do. But I am not surprised that you do reduce them to a few stereotypes. You love Manichean descriptions of reality.
 
Last edited:
You can always measure stuff, the devil is in the details, in what you do actually measure.

But it is indeed likely that the USA fare poorly in most of measurements of social justice. Although I fail to see the relation with Microsoft, unless you think they made Americans poorer, which seems absurd.


Not all of them do. But I am not surprised that you do reduce them to a few stereotypes.

Try harder to bring some "pertinence" to your comments.

M... R... A...
 
Back
Top Bottom