• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UK Has a Problem with Muslim Sex Gangs Preying on English Girls

Reminding everyone of the indisputable:

bombshell police report has revealed 75 per cent of known on-street child sex groomers in the West Midlands are Asian – with 82 per cent of victims, aged 14 to 16, being white.

West Midlands Police report reveals 75 per cent of known on-street child sex groomers are Asian - Birmingham Mail

A pattern repeated across England.

"The Muslim community must accept and address the fact that Asian and Pakistani men are disproportionately involved in “localised, street grooming” of vulnerable girls, one of the UK’s most senior prosecutors has said.
Nazir Afzal, the Crown Prosecution Service’s lead on child sexual abuse, told a meeting of Muslims in Bradford on Thursday night that the community had to address the issue of street grooming and that Muslims could not assume that “someone else is dealing with it for us”.

“We do have an issue with people of our ethnicity – it’s not the issue but an issue – and we have to take care of it, we have to deal with it. The solution comes from within. It comes from you,” he told the group of councillors, community workers and campaigners."

NOTE* This is from Nazir Afzal the Crown Prosecution Service.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...-afzal?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard (o look the GUARDIAN)

Why are we blaming girls for the actions of predatory men? | Left Foot Forward

Keep in mind, NO ONE is suggesting white men are innocent of such acts. White men are proportionately more likely to act alone etc.
 
Last edited:
gunner said:
Keep in mind, NO ONE is suggesting white men are innocent of such acts. White men are proportionately more likely to act alone etc.
Click to expand...

Then why is this the only form of sexually-related criminal activity that you have ever made a thread about on DP? Where are your threads on calling the white communities to account for the actions of lone-wolf sexual predators? Why aren't you shaming Christian leaders for the acts of people who might self-identify as Christians?

Hypocrisy and double standards have been very evident in all these 'Muslim rape-gang' threads from the beginning.
 
gunner said:
And in ALL cases you'll find disturbing patterns of behaviour: close family members involved (brothers/uncles/cousins) or at the very least friends. You'll find girls passed from Muslim gang-to-Muslim gang. You'll find the overwhelming majority of victims as white. You'll find victim testimony stating the perps often abused them with reference to race/skin colour (but we're not allowed to do the same when discussing the perps!). I've often asked for these apologist to provide evidence of the very same patterns of behaviour, from 'other groups' of paedophiles. NOT one single poster has provided any evidence, countering the claim. And of course, they won't, because NO OTHER groups of perps act in this very same way. That is, multiple gangs with friends and family and religious connections. For me, the intellectual acrobatics that some go to is very disturbing, to the point I feel, they may have some sinister reasons underpinning their defence.
Click to expand...
Its truly pathetic just how far the Muslim apologists will go to try to defend, avoid, distract, or otherwise divert attention from the real world **** that goes on all across the planet on a daily basis. Muslim fundamentalists are killing people left and right...but...but...but they arent REAL Muslims. In this case we have group of men committing despicable acts and their one common thread is that they are ALL Muslim men. But...but...but they arent REAL Muslims.

Yes...they are. They are fundamentalists practicing the Muslim faith and using it as their motivation and justification. Unlike the 'crack dealer' that happens to be a 'Christian' (a silly analogy used earlier her, but lets go with it), the crack dealers selling of drugs is nto found in the Bible. His motivation is not rooted in Christianity...even the perversion of Christianity. Unlike the fundamentalist terrorist that truly believes ALlah WANTS him to butcher innocent men women and children in His glorious name, the crack dealer that happens to be Christian is not motivated by his or her faith. AND...when it DOES happen where a Christian IS using religion as their motivation they TOO will and should rightfully be labelled as Christian Fundamentalist terrorists.

Such ridiculous lengths people will go to avoid the FACT that there have been a dozen cases documented against MUSLIM men who use their religious beliefs as motivation and justification.
 
Andalublue said:
Then why is this the only form of sexually-related criminal activity that you have ever made a thread about on DP? Where are your threads on calling the white communities to account for the actions of lone-wolf sexual predators? Why aren't you shaming Christian leaders for the acts of people who might self-identify as Christians?

Hypocrisy and double standards have been very evident in all these 'Muslim rape-gang' threads from the beginning.
Click to expand...
In the US, in the UK, in Spain, and even in Muslim countries, bad people do bad things. Men rape. Men steal. Men murder. Its all 'news' and its all 'relevant', but in the VAST majority of those cases, it is not done in the great and glorious name of Allah, or Jesus, or Yahweh, or Jo Jo the Rabbit. The difference is obvious to anyone that has the integrity to see it. Joe schmoe rapes someone because he is a scumbag...news at 11. Abi rapes someone because he is a scumbag...news at 11. FORTY FIVE MUSLIM MEN have been responsible for raping ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED young girls and do so in the name of their religion using their religions fundamentalist beliefs that non-Muslim girls are less than human...THATS a very real problem and one deserving of discussion.
 
truthatallcost said:
Nothing exists in the original manuscript of Genesis to support a claim that Isaac married Rebekah when she was 3 years old.

If some perverted Rabbi decided to rewrite Genesis as a work of fanfiction, we should take that into consideration.
Click to expand...

Since Isaac was 37 when his mother died, it was the same time Rebecca was born.

Isaac then married Rebecca when he was 40, that's three years later. Do the math.

Child marriages were a fact in pre-modern times. As Ive stated in a previous reply, there was a recorded child marriage to a 9 year old girl in London during 1675.

Lying at all costs isn't going to change things.
 
Andalublue said:
Then why is this the only form of sexually-related criminal activity that you have ever made a thread about on DP? Where are your threads on calling the white communities to account for the actions of lone-wolf sexual predators? Why aren't you shaming Christian leaders for the acts of people who might self-identify as Christians?

Hypocrisy and double standards have been very evident in all these 'Muslim rape-gang' threads from the beginning.
Click to expand...

What is the title of this thread?
 
Andalublue said:
Exactly. Quod erat demonstrandum.
Click to expand...

As a moderator of this board, you more than most, should apply the rules of sticking to the topic. To my knowledge, I wasn't aware we are only sanctioned to start threads authorised by the the mods!
 
Andalublue said:
Then why is this the only form of sexually-related criminal activity that you have ever made a thread about on DP? Where are your threads on calling the white communities to account for the actions of lone-wolf sexual predators? Why aren't you shaming Christian leaders for the acts of people who might self-identify as Christians?

Hypocrisy and double standards have been very evident in all these 'Muslim rape-gang' threads from the beginning.
Click to expand...

Hey Andy...how many threads have you seen on the rape of a 12 year old and the disgusting sentence involved in the case? When the Stanford rape trial was ongoing wouldn't you say a fair number of people were commenting on that issue as well? Is it fair to say a good number of people discussed (and still do) the molestation incidents perpetrated by some catholic priests? I mean...you asked the question...wouldn't you say that in fact there are whites commenting on rapes perpetrated by whites, Catholics commenting on Catholics, etc?

Where it is happening it is discussed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I don't understand this Islamophobic insensitivity to the sexual needs of Middle Eastern males. :shrug:
 
PoS said:
Since Isaac was 37 when his mother died, it was the same time Rebecca was born.

Isaac then married Rebecca when he was 40, that's three years later. Do the math.
Click to expand...

Again you are not quoting from the Bible that Christians use, you are quoting from what's known as Genesis Rabbah, which is a commentary filled explanation of Genesis. The author of Genesis Rabbah edited out actual passages from the original book of Genesis, including the key verses found in Gen 24:35-48, which tells about Isaac meeting wife Rebecca when she was a mature young woman, not a 3 year old girl

As with most works of fan fiction, Genesis Rabbah is not widely read or given much credence by most people who read and follow the Bible.

However.....

1.6 million Muslims follow and adore the life of Muhammad, who married his wife when she was 6 years old, and consummated the marriage shortly thereafter.


Child marriages were a fact in pre-modern times. As Ive stated in a previous reply, there was a recorded child marriage to a 9 year old girl in London during 1675.
Click to expand...

That's stupendous PoS, you found evidence that one Englishman married a child 340 years ago.

Does that change the fact that Muslims are marrying children in 2016? That Muslim sex gangs are preying upon pre-teen English children in 2016?

Lying at all costs isn't going to change things.
Click to expand...

No it isn't, so there's not much point in you continuing to grasp at straws by lying and misrepresenting the Bible. At least Chagos tries to be truthful, you on the other hand don't. It's a trend I've noticed by past exchanges.
 
PoS said:
I made a mistake on confusing Abraham and Isaac, but the rest is true:

Genesis - Chapter 25 (Parshah Chayei Sarah and Toldot) - Tanakh Online - Torah - Bible
Genesis 25:20
Still shows that marriage could be done with people at that age during those times and it wasnt just Muslims.
Click to expand...
ApoLogika: Did Isaac Really Marry A 3 Year Old Toddler?

Did Isaac Really Marry A 3 Year Old Toddler?
One can find some really outrageous claims being made on the Internet. This is just one of them.

Nowadays this one is made mostly by some Muslim Apologists who are obviously Embarrassed that their prophet Muhammad married a 6 year old and consummated the marriage when she was only 9. In a desperate effort to justify their prophet's behavior, they turn to a somewhat twisted version of the story of Isaac and Rebekah in which it is claimed that the two were married when he was 40 and she was at the tender age of 3.

How do they come up with these ages, you ask?
Well, they force a reading of Genesis 22 and 23 where the events described therein happened within the same time frame. Abraham offers a fully mature Isaac to the Lord in Genesis 22:1-19, Abraham's brother Nahor's progeny are listed in Genesis 22:20-24, and Sarah dies at 127 years old (Genesis 23:1-2).
We know from Genesis 17 that Sarah was 90 when she gave birth to Isaac, making him 37 at her death. Genesis 25:20 tells us Isaac was 40 when he married Rebekah, so this spurious claim is based on deducting his age at marriage from the alleged 3 years since Rebekah's birth, which they insist happened at about the same time as Sarah's death.

But what does Scripture itself tell us about our bride-to-be Rebekah?
[......]
[......]
Once again the text is clear. Rebekah is a young woman, not a toddler. Remember that your typical three year olds cannot carry heavy jugs of water on their shoulders. Their bodies are just too small and weak for this type of labor.
Note as well the phrase "a young woman who had not known a man intimately." Again, this is not a phrase one uses to describe a three year old.

17 Then the servant ran to meet her and said, “Please let me have a little water from your jug.”
18 She replied, “Drink, my lord.” She quickly lowered her jug to her hand and gave him a drink.
19 When she had finished giving him a drink, she said, “I’ll also draw water for your camels until they have had enough to drink.”
20 She quickly emptied her jug into the trough and hurried to the well again to draw water. She drew water for all his camels.​

- drawing water from a well is far too heavy a job to give to a 3 year old
- carrying even a single water jug to water the camels with would be too much for a 3 year old because each gallon of water weighs 10 pounds. Today, an average 3 year old weighs between 25.5 to 38.5 pounds.
[......]
Click to expand...
OTOH, we have Aisha herself saying she was 6 Multiple times.
The only scriptural 'contradiction' ('small disagreement that is closer to confirmation') in another Hadith, Tabari, saying she was 7.
Lest there be any doubt, in another passage, she was Playing with Dolls. (only allowed the very young)
So we have Mohammed's betrothed Playing with dolls, while Isaac's was Carrying and refilling water Jugs enough to quench men and Camels.
`
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom