• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

climate crisis disrupting life for millions

How much bliss does your ignorance give? We hace been over this time and again referring the the 97% which is only 97% of those willing to give their view.

I'm not interested in the views of proctologists on this issue
 
And yet some of the greatest scientific minds this world has ever known, thousands of them, disagree with you

But i don't make my living off government grants. And there are plenty of scientists, you know, the independent ones, who do agree with me. Science isn't "settled". There is still room for debate.
 
But i don't make my living off government grants. And there are plenty of scientists, you know, the independent ones, who do agree with me. Science isn't "settled". There is still room for debate.

Debate away.


Policy will be based on the overwhelming consensus.


It always is
 
Debate away.


Policy will be based on the overwhelming consensus.


It always is

No, it's not. It's often based on political muscle. On where the money can be made. "Consensus" can be manufactured. Follow the money.
 
No, it's not. It's often based on political muscle. On where the money can be made. "Consensus" can be manufactured. Follow the money.

Ahhhhh. That must be why they faked the moon landing.


Follow the money. Lol
 
If you have nothing further...I accept your concession

Accepting as facts things that don't exist is the basis of the field of study for which you have been issued your CAGW PHD.

I hope Tinkerbell is healthy and flying well.

Compare both the science and the response to Covid-19 with the response and science of CAGW.

Do you see any differences between the science and the response to Covid-19 and the science and response to the crap show that is CAGW?

The difference is based on one, central FACT. Covid-19 is real. CAGW is crap. Only a person with a PHD in CAGW Science can't see the difference.

Dig a hole.
 
Accepting as facts things that don't exist is the basis of the field of study for which you have been issued your CAGW PHD.

I hope Tinkerbell is healthy and flying well.

Compare both the science and the response to Covid-19 with the response and science of CAGW.

Do you see any differences between the science and the response to Covid-19 and the science and response to the crap show that is CAGW?

The difference is based on one, central FACT. Covid-19 is real. CAGW is crap. Only a person with a PHD in CAGW Science can't see the difference.

Dig a hole.

Yes let's look at that.


Exactly how many people will be infected?
Exactly how many will die?
What is the exact course of treatment for each person?


What??? There is a range???? There is vast disagreement???



Man.....that was easy
 
Yes let's look at that.


Exactly how many people will be infected?
Exactly how many will die?
What is the exact course of treatment for each person?


What??? There is a range???? There is vast disagreement???



Man.....that was easy

One single agreed upon data base.

Updates that all agree with each other.

Identified Virus agreed upon as the exclusive cause.

Proven, rock solid causation link between the virus and the symptoms.

Proven mitigation techniques that are actually being employed world wide and that seem to be working.

Proven research methods and processes that produce real world changes to limit the damage from the cited cause.

The tragic thing about Coronavirus is that it kills people.

The tragic thing about CAGW Science is that it make its practitioners even more stupid.

You may feel free to spell stupid with two o's.
 
One single agreed upon data base.

Updates that all agree with each other.

Identified Virus agreed upon as the exclusive cause.

Proven, rock solid causation link between the virus and the symptoms.

Proven mitigation techniques that are actually being employed world wide and that seem to be working.

Proven research methods and processes that produce real world changes to limit the damage from the cited cause.

The tragic thing about Coronavirus is that it kills people.

The tragic thing about CAGW Science is that it make its practitioners even more stupid.

You may feel free to spell stupid with two o's.

You are willing to accept wide disagreement in science in this area. But not in AGW. Your argument is inconsistent
 
Back
Top Bottom