[W27]***Prince Charles Flies into Davos, then Demands Green Taxes to Fight climate change

Sampson Simpson said:

You ****ing people just continue to spread and repeat the same dumb ****.

Once again for the slow people: Being for green energy and better environment doesn't mean you have to not use any energy at all

Click to expand...

Sampson Simpson said:

You ****ing people just continue to spread and repeat the same dumb ****.

Once again for the slow people: Being for green energy and better environment doesn't mean you have to not use any energy at all

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

Oh, God. This ****ing idiocy again?



People need to appear in person at various events. To do that, they need to get there. I'm sure you'd all love it if they disappeared from the face of the Earth for a few months each way so that they could take sailboat followed by horse and buggy, but they aren't nearly as stupid as they'd need to be to listen to your dumb bull****.

They're not going to silence themselves by not traveling to appear simply because someone is dishonest on the internet.

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

Oh, God. This ****ing idiocy again?



People need to appear in person at various events. To do that, they need to get there. I'm sure you'd all love it if they disappeared from the face of the Earth for a few months each way so that they could take sailboat followed by horse and buggy, but they aren't nearly as stupid as they'd need to be to listen to your dumb bull****.

They're not going to silence themselves by not traveling to appear simply because someone is dishonest on the internet.

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

Oh, God. This ****ing idiocy again?



People need to appear in person at various events. To do that, they need to get there. I'm sure you'd all love it if they disappeared from the face of the Earth for a few months each way so that they could take sailboat followed by horse and buggy, but they aren't nearly as stupid as they'd need to be to listen to your dumb bull****.

They're not going to silence themselves by not traveling to appear simply because someone is dishonest on the internet.

Click to expand...

PoS said:

LOL the stalking is right on cue again!:

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

Oh, God. This hopeless ****ing idiocy and dishonesty again?



People need to appear in person at various events. To do that, they need to get there. I'm sure you'd all love it if they disappeared from the face of the Earth for a few months each way so that they could take sailboat followed by horse and buggy, but they aren't nearly as stupid as they'd need to be to listen to your dumb bull****.

They're not going to silence themselves by not traveling to appear simply because someone is dishonest in an extremely stupid direction on the internet.

Click to expand...

Jetboogieman said:

The denialists will attack him anyway, even if he travelled by horse and buggy.

I am no fan of The Prince of Wales in general but they can’t argue the science, so they simply attack anyone who talks about climate change.

Prince Charles travels by plane, attack.

Greta tries for travel by boat, ridiculed.

It’s not about the mode of transportation, it’s pretending these kinds of attacks refutes and degrades the actual science, it doesn’t.

Click to expand...

TheParser said:

His Royal Highness had no business going to Davos, let alone giving orders of any kind.

No one elected him to any office.

He just happened to be born to a woman who just happened to become the Queen.

His role in life is to be a figurehead.

He is to attend ceremonial functions, smile and wave to his subjects, and keep his mouth shut on all controversial topics.

Click to expand...

The heir to the British throne and lifelong environmentalist was speaking to CNN after he threw down a challenge to the global business and finance elites in Davos to lead a "paradigm shift, one that inspires action at revolutionary levels and pace" to avert the approaching catastrophe.

"Do we want to go down in history as the people who did nothing to bring the world back from the brink in time to restore the balance when we could have done? I don't want to," he told the audience at the WEF's 50th annual meeting.

Click to expand...

Jetboogieman said:

Could you possibly get anymore pathetically victim mentality here?

its a debate forum, everything you post is publicly available to be replied by anyone.

If you can’t handle that, then by all means, retreat off the site and go cry into a safe space where you can bitch about Greta, Mr. Person and all other meanie heads who have the audacity to say things you don’t like.

Click to expand...

Jetboogieman said:

The denialists will attack him anyway, even if he travelled by horse and buggy.

I am no fan of The Prince of Wales in general but they can’t argue the science, so they simply attack anyone who talks about climate change.

Prince Charles travels by plane, attack.

Greta tries for travel by boat, ridiculed.

It’s not about the mode of transportation, it’s pretending these kinds of attacks refutes and degrades the actual science, it doesn’t.



Could you possibly get anymore pathetically victim mentality here?

its a debate forum, everything you post is publicly available to be replied by anyone.

If you can’t handle that, then by all means, retreat off the site and go cry into a safe space where you can bitch about Greta, Mr. Person and all other meanie heads who have the audacity to say things you don’t like.

Click to expand...

Sampson Simpson said:

They are right wingers, everything they believe and post is completely stupid. And they just keep repeating the same dumb **** over and over

Click to expand...

PoS said:

LOL really? So it's okay to take private flights and use as much fossil fuels as you want as long as you're "for" green energy? You clearly have no idea what youre talking about. :lamo

Click to expand...

Napoleon said:

Do they? Is Prince Charles contributing anything that requires his physical presence rather than a teleconference? I don’t know why activists think themselves so important that they must contribute to a problem for no reason other than to restate the problem.

Click to expand...

PoS said:

Prince Charles in Davos: We need a new economic model or the planet will burn - CNN

Prince Charles flies to Davos on a jet emitting six tonnes of carbon to launch sustainable project | Daily Mail Online

Yup, he flies into the conference on a chartered jet, then demands that everyone pay more money and change their lifestyle to "save" the planet. You cant get any more hypocritical than this. :lamo

Click to expand...

Fledermaus said:

Some could say the same of your posts.... They are quite repetitive.

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

Christ, it doesn't matter. It's idiotic. As Jet pointed out, they attack anyone who does not deny AGW for their mode of transportation. If jet, this. If commercial, that. If boat, ridicule.

And the fundamental idea is completely dishonest. It's just like when a hyperpartisan attacks Democrats for saying we need to raise taxes back to pay for what we're spending. What does the hyperpartisan say? That Democrats are hypocrites for saying we should reverse GOP tax cuts unless they actually try to voluntarily pay the government extra in an amount equal to what they would pay if they raised taxes back to where they want. Or that Democrats are hypocrites for opposing citizens united while taking advantage of funding opportunities allowed by that decision.

There is absolutely no hypocrisy in advocating for something that would affect everyone, but continuing to operate in the world under rules as they are.





It's ridiculous, dishonest, and transparent. There is no substance to it. It's just about attacking the person.

And if AGW proponents were actually dumb enough to be duped by these charades, they would be silencing themselves. Just like someone who wants to raise taxes on everyone would be idiotically harming themselves if they tried to pay extra. Just like democrats who oppose citizens united would lose elections, therefore not be in a place to do anything about citizens united, if they didn't take advantage of the donations they can. Fortunately, none of those groups are dumb enough to actually listen to these attacks.

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

Christ, it doesn't matter. It's idiotic. As Jet pointed out, they attack anyone who does not deny AGW for their mode of transportation. If jet, this. If commercial, that. If boat, ridicule.

And the fundamental idea is completely dishonest. It's just like when a hyperpartisan attacks Democrats for saying we need to raise taxes back to pay for what we're spending. What does the hyperpartisan say? That Democrats are hypocrites for saying we should reverse GOP tax cuts unless they actually try to voluntarily pay the government extra in an amount equal to what they would pay if they raised taxes back to where they want. Or that Democrats are hypocrites for opposing citizens united while taking advantage of funding opportunities allowed by that decision.

There is absolutely no hypocrisy in advocating for something that would affect everyone, but continuing to operate in the world under rules as they are.





It's ridiculous, dishonest, and transparent. There is no substance to it. It's just about attacking the person.

And if AGW proponents were actually dumb enough to be duped by these charades, they would be silencing themselves. Just like someone who wants to raise taxes on everyone would be idiotically harming themselves if they tried to pay extra. Just like democrats who oppose citizens united would lose elections, therefore not be in a place to do anything about citizens united, if they didn't take advantage of the donations they can. Fortunately, none of those groups are dumb enough to actually listen to these attacks.

Click to expand...

Sampson Simpson said:

No you can't, that's more really bad and unoriginal trolling on your part. Unlike you, I posted on topic. Unlike you, I post more than a single incomplete sentence. Unlike you, I actually provided my reasoning for my position, something people like you are incapable of

It's just more projection. They are hypocrites in pretty much every facet of life, so they assume liberals must be as hypocritical as they are. They are dishonest all the time, so they seem to think liberals must be as well. They are selfish and greedy, so therefor liberals must be as well.

They have no empathy, they think their tiny worldview and limited interaction with people outside their demographic, and they think that represents everything. Since they have no empathy, they can't possibly fathom people not being like them. That's why the incessant projection

Click to expand...

Napoleon said:

It is not at all unreasonable to ask what justification they have for contributing to the problem or to hold activists to the standards they set for others. They aren’t adding any value to justify contributing to the problem many orders of magnitude above the average person and they deserve to be criticized for that.

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

Whatever you post, you know perfectly well that there is no honest, substantive critique here, or in the other kinds of cases I mentioned. Whatever you post, you know perfectly well that the people who make this kind of dishonest, ridiculous, and transparent attack on a target will never have anything positive to say about that target. They will attack that target no matter what it does or says.

And I am quite tired of 'debating' what reality is. I know exactly what this thread is about because I've seen versions of it countless times in the decades I have unwisely spent trying to talk to people online.

Click to expand...