• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Somerville said:
What were your words in post #14?
Click to expand...

Yes, I said they used a photo from polluted Asia.

Your point please?

I do get confused responding to more than a dozen threads a day.

Am I in error some how?
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

521101_cuyahoga_river_fire_cr_cpl_widescreen.jpg

MAGA




a
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Somerville said:
What I, and others see, is a tendency by some to reject any data that contradicts what amounts to religious beliefs.
Click to expand...

I see the photo as being used for that reason.
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Helix said:
View attachment 67272557

MAGA




a
Click to expand...

Huh?

You use an incident that happened in 1969?

WTF? Are you for real?

I haven't seen anyone here complain about sensible EPA regulations, and it wasn't formed until 1970. Possible because of events like that, and under your 3rd most hatred president, president Nixon.

President Trump has only been rolling back idiotic regulations created under the Obama administration. Can you show me a single regulation he has tried to roll back prior to 2009?

I'll bet you can't.

Do you have a point that makes sense, or are you just wasting our time here?
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
Huh?

You use an incident that happened in 1969?

WTF? Are you for real?

I haven't seen anyone here complain about sensible EPA regulations, and it wasn't formed until 1970. Possible because of events like that, and under your 3rd most hatred president, president Nixon.

President Trump has only been rolling back idiotic regulations created under the Obama administration. Can you show me a single regulation he has tried to roll back prior to 2009?

I'll bet you can't.

Do you have a point that makes sense, or are you just wasting our time here?
Click to expand...

It's going to take a Little While to get back to Amazing River Fires, but Trumpists are in it for the long haul!
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
So...

What does that tell you when they show a stock photo with no location indicated?

I'm not sure, but the oldest photo incident I found of that image was Bangladesh. That doesn't mean it was from there, but the majority of the photos are in Asian web locations.

Don't you see how the US media continuously deceives the public?

It's pretty bad when Al'Jazera is a better source than USA sources.
Click to expand...

Damn Lord! Do you realize what you are doing? You are attacking the source instead of refuting what the source says. It is just another dishonest debate tactic you keep resorting to because you can't really debate the science.
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Helix said:
It's going to take a Little While to get back to Amazing River Fires, but Trumpists are in it for the long haul!
Click to expand...

I see your faith is strong.

Have any non-religious type beliefs to debate?
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Buzz said:
Damn Lord! Do you realize what you are doing? You are attacking the source instead of refuting what the source says. It is just another dishonest debate tactic you keep resorting to because you can't really debate the science.
Click to expand...

Images leave impressions. Such images and wording in the article constitute a lie.

Does you integrity allow for such lies?
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
I see your faith is strong.

Have any non-religious type beliefs to debate?
Click to expand...

it's about making money. those damn commies and their waterways or whatever must not be allowed to slow down the wealthiest. Tweety has made so much money that he has had to go bankrupt multiple times because his wealth is like an automobile odometer.
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Helix said:
it's about making money. those damn commies and their waterways or whatever must not be allowed to slow down the wealthiest. Tweety has made so much money that he has had to go bankrupt multiple times because his wealth is like an automobile odometer.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but I don't follow what you are saying. It appears you believe he has sold out to allowing pollution go monitored. I don't see that. The only rollbacks I see are harsh regulations put in place during the Obama administration, most of which haven't even taken effect yet.

If I'm wrong, please show me.
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
I'm sorry, but I don't follow what you are saying. It appears you believe he has sold out to allowing pollution go monitored. I don't see that. The only rollbacks I see are harsh regulations put in place during the Obama administration, most of which haven't even taken effect yet.

If I'm wrong, please show me.
Click to expand...

Tracking deregulation in the Trump era

click the Environmental option if it's there in whatever reality you have made for yourself. if it is, find some way to dismiss the whole thing, and i'll scroll past your response.
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Helix said:
Tracking deregulation in the Trump era

click the Environmental option if it's there in whatever reality you have made for yourself. if it is, find some way to dismiss the whole thing, and i'll scroll past your response.
Click to expand...

How does that support what you said, rather than what I said?

Did you read any single entry, clicking on the "+"?

I read several, and all were recent in year,

It seems you are making my point for me!
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
How does that support what you said, rather than what I said?

Did you read any single entry, clicking on the "+"?

I read several, and all were recent in year,

It seems you are making my point for me!
Click to expand...

11DURANGO1-facebookJumbo.jpg

yee haw! i sure am thirsty.
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Helix said:
View attachment 67272559

yee haw! i sure am thirsty.
Click to expand...

Isn't that the river, that during the Obama administration, they went to clean up a mining area, and broke a dirt dam in the process, polluting the river.... By the EPA?
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
Images leave impressions. Such images and wording in the article constitute a lie.

Does you integrity allow for such lies?
Click to expand...

Oh please... That is just a completely ridiculous standard to apply to just articles that you disagree with. What about all the denialists BS that gets posted around here? Do you think that Anthony Watts and all his posters at WUWT don't use stock photos for their articles? Does this mean they are lying as well?
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
Isn't that the river, that during the Obama administration, they went to clean up a mining area, and broke a dirt dam in the process, polluting the river.... By the EPA?
Click to expand...

if you drink a cup or two of that, you're guaranteed not to get the windmill cancer. MRGA
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Helix...

Are you aware you where your image comes from, and when?

Article, 8/10/15:

EPA Says It Released 3 Million Gallons Of Contaminated Water Into River

Again, can you show me where president Trump is rolling back any new regulations under president Obama?

Why was the Obama EPA so irresponsible? They are 100% responsible for that incident. They were very negligent!
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Helix said:
if you drink a cup or two of that, you're guaranteed not to get the windmill cancer. MRGA
Click to expand...

Why does that have anything to do with what we are discussing?
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
Why does that have anything to do with what we are discussing?
Click to expand...

we're talking about making our rivers great again via deregulation. we should go boating sometime on a really polluted river. easiest fishin' you'll ever do. fish jump right into the boat, and then you can just toss a match on them for cooking.
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Helix said:
we're talking about making our rivers great again via deregulation. we should go boating sometime on a really polluted river. easiest fishin' you'll ever do. fish jump right into the boat, and then you can just toss a match on them for cooking.
Click to expand...

OK, so we have a serious incident that happens under the watch of the Obama EPA. You bring in useless banter, and blame president Trump.

Is that all you have?
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
I'm sorry, but I don't follow what you are saying. It appears you believe he has sold out to allowing pollution go monitored. I don't see that. The only rollbacks I see are harsh regulations put in place during the Obama administration, most of which haven't even taken effect yet.

If I'm wrong, please show me.
Click to expand...

Good lord, man. If a liberal doctor was treating a stab wound you'd suffered, you'd stab yourself ten more times just to stick it to him.

The moment people on the left started listening to AGW scientists, the entirety of the right seems to have swung to not only denying AGW but denying the utility of any policy designed to improve our environment. Let you have your way and our cities would look like this:


china-pollution.jpg


.....................................................................Pictured: "teh freedomz"
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Mr Person said:
Good lord, man. If a liberal doctor was treating a stab wound you'd suffered, you'd stab yourself ten more times just to stick it to him.

The moment people on the left started listening to AGW scientists, the entirety of the right seems to have swung to not only denying AGW but denying the utility of any policy designed to improve our environment. Let you have your way and our cities would look like this:


china-pollution.jpg


.....................................................................Pictured: "teh freedomz"
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but your perspective is wrong.
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Lord of Planar said:
OK, so we have a serious incident that happens under the watch of the Obama EPA. You bring in useless banter, and blame president Trump.

Is that all you have?
Click to expand...

no. i'll also point out that King Tangface the Impeached is a spray painted oversized toddler who is ****ing up the EPA on purpose. the proper response is to punish every Republican at the polls. see you then! and then the next time, too!
 
Re: EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science

Helix said:
no. i'll also point out that King Tangface the Impeached is a spray painted oversized toddler who is ****ing up the EPA on purpose. the proper response is to punish every Republican at the polls. see you then! and then the next time, too!
Click to expand...

OK.

Allegations and no evidence.

OK...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom