- Joined
- Feb 15, 2019
- Messages
- 11,132
- Reaction score
- 1,592
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Those were bushfires set by aboriginal people.
A practice they have mostly ceased.
Those were bushfires set by aboriginal people.
I figure you will eventually admit when something bad happens.
The definition of a pollutant is anything that is present or is introduced into environment, and which has harmful or poisonous effects. CO2 can absolutely have both harmful and poisonous effects when introduced into the environment in sufficient quantities. Therefore, it is a pollutant, regardless of whether you want to classify it as one.
LOL!!!
Read that aloud to yourself.
Then have a think about all those claims that the world is ending due to drastic bad things currently happening.
"World is ending".
BWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The only idiots who think the world will end are those Fundies.
OK, so how bad do you think it will be if we don't change our economy?
I keep hearing about economy and Capitalism. What do they have to do with the concern about global warming? Are those the right-wing talking points? Elaborate please.
Like pulling teeth.......
How bad do you, that is YOU, think it will be if we don't reduce the reliance we have upon fossil fuels?
Is that clear enough for you to answer?
So now it's about fossil fuels, not the economy? You're confusing yourself.
I'll turn the table around on you and ask you a similar question.
How bad do you, that is YOU, think it will be if we try to seek a cleaner and alternative source of energy?
Is that clear enough for you to answer?
I'll show you how an answer looks;
The current level of unnecessary deaths due to the anti-CO2 hype of around 20 million people per year will pale into insignificance. The over all death levels of not using fossil fuels will be in the order of a large, above 20%, of population. That is before the massive wars start. That will make it a lot worse. Or has the potential to especially with all the nuclear power plants around the world which can easily be converted intoo massively destructive catastrophies with radio-active poision spread all around the planet.
A future war is also likely to use bio-war. This can be easily the cause of 99% wipe out.
The power we have via science should be respected and feared. Don't rock the boat when there is no need.
Now can you actually say what it is you are afraid of?
I'll show you how an answer looks;
The current level of unnecessary deaths due to the anti-CO2 hype of around 20 million people per year will pale into insignificance. The over all death levels of not using fossil fuels will be in the order of a large, above 20%, of population. That is before the massive wars start. That will make it a lot worse. Or has the potential to especially with all the nuclear power plants around the world which can easily be converted intoo massively destructive catastrophies with radio-active poision spread all around the planet.
A future war is also likely to use bio-war. This can be easily the cause of 99% wipe out.
The power we have via science should be respected and feared. Don't rock the boat when there is no need.
Now can you actually say what it is you are afraid of?
Still not about economy as you claimed. So I guess you're still confused.
BTW what you farted into a little semblance of what they call a post sounds like a right-wing or a conspiracy theory tripe. Care to post a link?
You asked a question I answered what my views are.
Waht are your views?
What do you think will happen that is bad as a result of our use of fossil fuels?
You asked a question I answered what my views are.
Waht are your views?
What do you think will happen that is bad as a result of our use of fossil fuels?
I have never made my view clear about the fossil fuels. It's your imagination.
True, you are not one to debate in good faith.
Will you state your position or run away from that?
The answer has already been provided.
Now answer my question (you're ignoring it for some reason).
What do you think will happen that is bad as we rely less on the fossil fuels and more on alternative source?
1, Evaision has been provided. You really don't do this memory thing do you?
2, I refer you to the very clear answer I gave and that you commented on. (millions of deaths, war more millions of deaths, making the world considerably toxic etc.)
The answer has been provided by vegas. Why should I provide it to you when he already provided it right there up there?
The answer has been provided by vegas. Why should I provide it to you when he already provided it right there up there?
I am asking you. YOU have not answered. I am also not interested in evaisions in any form. Posting a link to something he has not read is another evaision.
Read every word of it. Have you?