• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Apocalyptic Claims About Climate Change Are Wrong

Yes, his predictions are wrong. That doesn't make him a bad scientist. Just misguided, in believing he had all the answers. His work is pretty good.

I would like you to produce the paper where Hansen claims a 4 to 9 degree F increase. I'll bet his paper doesn't say that, but is another paper misused by the pundits. His papers are exercises in possible outcomes like most others are. Imaginary levels that pundits then clam as facts.

I have not yet seen a bad paper from James Hansen. Maybe you can change my mind. Surely you have something better than a poorly sourced blog?

What part of this peer-reviewed paper predicting an ice-age did you miss? Hansen provided the faked data and developed the climate model used in this paper.
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate - Science, Volume 173, Issue 3992, pp. 138-141, July 9, 1971

Your utter devotion to this documented fraud is noted.
 
Our climate is increasingly placid.

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Another year, and still no increase in severe U.S. tornadoes[/h][FONT=&quot]By Paul Homewood Climate scientists love to blame every bad weather event on global warming. Yet we never hear them cite climate change for the relative absence of bad weather! One such example are tornadoes in the US, where we now have several decades of carefully collated data. With the year near an end, we…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
What part of this peer-reviewed paper predicting an ice-age did you miss? Hansen provided the faked data and developed the climate model used in this paper.
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate - Science, Volume 173, Issue 3992, pp. 138-141, July 9, 1971

Your utter devotion to this documented fraud is noted.

Your link doesn't say that.

You have provided no evidence.

Glitch? Did you run away?

That link you gave me only mentions Hansen, footnotes 16 and 17. What evidence do you have:

16. J. E. Hansen, personal communication. We
are indebted to Dr. Hansen for making these
Mie scattering calculations for us, for sug-
gesting the use of the two-stream approximation,
and for checking the fluxes obtained by
the two-stream approximation against some
exact solutions (which agree to within about
5 percent) to the multiple scattering problem
[see, for example, J. E. Hansen, Astrophys.
J. 155, 565 (1969)].

17. J. E. Hansen and J. B. Pollack, J. Atmos.
Sci. 27, 265 (1970).

Back during these times, Hansen was studying the atmosphere for NASA, as for knowing what rockets had to travel through. Are these the papers you claim are faked? Real rocket scientist work?
 
Last edited:
Our climate is increasingly placid.

[FONT="][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/12/27/another-year-and-still-no-increase-in-severe-u-s-tornadoes/"]
altus-multiple-tornadoes.jpg
[/URL][/FONT]

[h=1]Another year, and still no increase in severe U.S. tornadoes[/h][FONT="][FONT=inherit]By Paul Homewood Climate scientists love to blame every bad weather event on global warming. Yet we never hear them cite climate change for the relative absence of bad weather! One such example are tornadoes in the US, where we now have several decades of carefully collated data. With the year near an end, we…[/FONT]
[FONT=inherit][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/12/27/another-year-and-still-no-increase-in-severe-u-s-tornadoes/"]Continue reading →[/URL][/FONT]
[/FONT]

Mother Nature simply refuses to do as the dogma says she must.
 
Glitch? Did you run away?
I see no point in continuing to demonstrate Hansen's fraud to someone so blindly dedicated to worshiping the very ground he walks upon. I simply dismiss your religious devotion to Hansen as being grossly uninformed and a complete waste of my time. Your adoration of Hansen and your support of his deliberate fraud makes everything you post not credible or worthy of a response. So enjoy your Hansen worship all by yourself.
 
I see no point in continuing to demonstrate Hansen's fraud to someone so blindly dedicated to worshiping the very ground he walks upon. I simply dismiss your religious devotion to Hansen as being grossly uninformed and a complete waste of my time. Your adoration of Hansen and your support of his deliberate fraud makes everything you post not credible or worthy of a response. So enjoy your Hansen worship all by yourself.

But you didn't demonstrate it. You made claims with zero backup.
 
Back
Top Bottom