• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gender equality needed for climate salvation.

Can you manage to separate reality from mental illness? It’s impossible for a male to understand or even know what it’s like to be a female. Or vice verse. Just like it’s impossible for you to know what it’s like to be a dog. Or a pony. Or whatever the 27 other genders supposedly are.

And me, not giving a **** about what you lie about on the internet, is supposed to teach someone without two brain cells to rub together about penises and vagina’s.

You ask too much. Only Jesus would WANT to save you.


Gender is a sociological term, not a biological one. A highschool education would know that.
 
Can you manage to separate gender and orientation? No. So you don't have a third grader's understanding to begin with. And me, a PhD candidate, is supposed to teach someone without an elementary school level understanding of gender?

You ask too much. I think only Jesus could save you.

Can you manage to separate the subject of this thread, the science of teh world being dragged down by ideology, from mad SJW none-sense?

About your pHD; given they pass over taking you up on the idea obviously they did not think you have what it takes, If I were you I would wait untill I passed stuff before boasting about iit. As somebody who has been on this forum for 10 years you are too old to be likely to be doing a pHD at normal speed.
 
You consider my posts moronic but are unable to say why that is. You say I am playing the victim, but are unable to say what I am being the victim of or how that works.

You are just throwing nasty insuults at it.

Well, OK. You are triggered. I don't know why. You wont tell me. I am supposed to just go and find out. Ummmmmm........................

If you believe something absolutely but can't say why or what it is you are not using rational thinking. You should have a think about it.

Just dismiss him...and tell him to see my sig.

LOL!!
 
Can you manage to separate the subject of this thread, the science of teh world being dragged down by ideology, from mad SJW none-sense?

About your pHD; given they pass over taking you up on the idea obviously they did not think you have what it takes, If I were you I would wait untill I passed stuff before boasting about iit. As somebody who has been on this forum for 10 years you are too old to be likely to be doing a pHD at normal speed.

You know as much about higher education as you do gender or world development. Stop wasting everyone's time with paranoid delusional victim complexes.
 
You know as much about higher education as you do gender or world development. Stop wasting everyone's time with paranoid delusional victim complexes.

I'm not. You sort of seem to be. I still have no idea what your point is in this thread.
 
Gender is a sociological term, not a biological one. A highschool education would know that.

Not the high school anyone I know went to. Maybe high school after you guys made all this bull**** up.
 
Not the high school anyone I know went to. Maybe high school after you guys made all this bull**** up.

Gender has always been a sociological term. You got mixed up because your only education in the subject is the euphemism presented on forms to avoid the word 'sex'. But that's a misuse of the term.

A "read a form" education is simply insufficient to grasp the concept. We might note that no amount of ignorance from you will change this.
 

Trudeau did the same thing when he was renegotiating NAFTA...in this case, trying to include gender issues into an unrelated trade agreement.

Trudeau wants to include a gender chapter in the new NAFTA | The Star

Thankfully, Trump wasn't having it...just as he wasn't having any part in the Paris Climate Accord. Make trade about trade...climate about climate. Not use them to advance pet social justice issues.
 
Gender has always been a sociological term. You got mixed up because your only education in the subject is the euphemism presented on forms to avoid the word 'sex'. But that's a misuse of the term.

A "read a form" education is simply insufficient to grasp the concept. We might note that no amount of ignorance from you will change this.

No it hasn’t. Just because there was some idiot before trying to pass off this nonsense doesn’t mean it ‘always’ has been. It’s new age fabricated nonsense. Believing you are anything other than what you actually are is all in your head. And if what’s in your head doesn’t align with reality, you’re simply not right in the head and need help.

Anyone supporting someone else’s irrational delusions is just an enabler. And clearly has their own identity issues. Supporting their efforts is not any better.

But it’s a free country. Believe what you want. It’s only a problem when you try and compel your beliefs on me.
 
No it hasn’t. Just because there was some idiot before trying to pass off this nonsense doesn’t mean it ‘always’ has been. It’s new age fabricated nonsense. Believing you are anything other than what you actually are is all in your head. And if what’s in your head doesn’t align with reality, you’re simply not right in the head and need help.

Anyone supporting someone else’s irrational delusions is just an enabler. And clearly has their own identity issues. Supporting their efforts is not any better.

But it’s a free country. Believe what you want. It’s only a problem when you try and compel your beliefs on me.

Gender has always been a sociological term. Almost any level education would be aware of that. Moronically claiming, "but it's always meant biology to my uneducated understanding and guesstimation" is not a counter argument.

It's a sociological term. It means the roles and expectations applied to various groups by society. Genders include age, orientation and other groups.

It's a special kinda backwoods stupid to continue to insist it means biology because "that's what I done thunk it meaned".
 
Gender has always been a sociological term. Almost any level education would be aware of that. Moronically claiming, "but it's always meant biology to my uneducated understanding and guesstimation" is not a counter argument.

It's a sociological term. It means the roles and expectations applied to various groups by society. Genders include age, orientation and other groups.

It's a special kinda backwoods stupid to continue to insist it means biology because "that's what I done thunk it meaned".

No it hasn’t. Almost anyone with more than two brain cells would be aware of that. Moronically claiming someone said something they did not say is a cowards argument and the only you are ever likely to make.

It’s a biological term. It always has been. It’s means the genitalia you have. It always has and always will.

You’ll have to try and change the Latin language if you have even the remotest hope of success.
 
Gender has always been a sociological term. Almost any level education would be aware of that. Moronically claiming, "but it's always meant biology to my uneducated understanding and guesstimation" is not a counter argument.

It's a sociological term. It means the roles and expectations applied to various groups by society. Genders include age, orientation and other groups.

It's a special kinda backwoods stupid to continue to insist it means biology because "that's what I done thunk it meaned".

No gender does not include age.

You will never pass any sort of pHD with that sort of drivel coming out of you unless it is grievance studies or similar gibberish.


1.
either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.
"a condition that affects people of both genders"
 
No it hasn’t. Almost anyone with more than two brain cells would be aware of that. Moronically claiming someone said something they did not say is a cowards argument and the only you are ever likely to make.

It’s a biological term. It always has been. It’s means the genitalia you have. It always has and always will.

You’ll have to try and change the Latin language if you have even the remotest hope of success.

Get a high school education.
 
If this is the sort of help you need, it's no wonder your OP is utterly and embarrassingly clueless victim crybaby bs.

I'm a skeptic. Your OP is manbaby victim crap and totally ignorant. Pathetic.

Gee, really touched a nerve. Your post seems to be full of manbaby victim crap. With the over the top personal attack, you really are acting like quite the victim.
 
Uh huh. And your interest in knowing why they create that "science"?

You want to know why the gop funded NASA that is run by a trump appointee does scientific research?


It's their job
 

No gender does not include age.

You will never pass any sort of pHD with that sort of drivel coming out of you unless it is grievance studies or similar gibberish.

"I'm dictionary educated so I knows betta!"

Okay.
 
Back
Top Bottom