- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 92,058
- Reaction score
- 91,082
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Except the consensus is just that we have an effect. None of the "97%" consensus stated as AWG being most of the cause is supported. One of the studies that used questions to scientists asked a question to the effect "is AGW a significant cause of warming." To a technically minded person, significant generally means around 5% or more. Something worth including.
So I agree with the consensus that AGW has at least a 5% effect. Now I would say closer to 25%, but the consensus argument is among the weakest out there.
the consensus is that burning ****loads of carbon is changing the climate. the other nonsense is CT.