Ha, ha, ha. Oh, gosh, YOU! What a joke. A regular glutton for punishment.
The following are two excerpts giving facts regarding your posted article by Dr. Stephen Schneider from the link given further below:
“Carbon dioxide was predicted to have only a minor role. However, the model was very simple and the calculation of the CO2 effect was lower than other estimates by a factor of about three, as noted in a footnote to the paper.”
“The story made headlines in the New York Times. Shortly afterwards, Schneider became aware that he had overestimated the cooling effect of aerosols, and underestimated the warming effect of CO2 by a factor of about three. He had mistakenly assumed that measurements of air particles he had taken near the source of pollution applied worldwide. He also found that much of the effect was due to natural aerosols which would not be affected by human activities, so the cooling effect of changes in industrial pollution would be much less than he had calculated. Having found that recalculation showed that global warming was the more likely outcome, he published a retraction of his earlier findings in 1974.”
Stephen Schneider - Wikipedia
The retraction was published the year before the article you pretend supports your BS claim. What a laugh. Hilarious.
No major scientific view, as I posted before, came out of Schneider’s study, the project of which he was a deputy director, in the first place. Regardless of the fact of my reference I gave in this post. You failed coming and going.
More misleading presentation from Jack Hays. You’re simply not a credible debater.
[/FONT]
