• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

11,000 Scientists Don't say..

Deuce said:
That’s not defending a list, that’s rejecting your hypocrisy. Owned :lamo
Click to expand...

lol strawmanning again? I displayed no hypocrisy- youre just weaseling out as usual, but youve been caught red handed. :lol:

Jack Hays said:
:roll: This would be like the commander of the Bismarck​ declaring victory as his ship keels over and sinks.
Click to expand...

LMAO perfect analogy.
 
How's the oregon petition going? Lol
 
Jack Hays said:
Going back to my #6 and your #7, you chose to attack the qualifications of those on a list that represented signers honestly, and deflect from discussion of a (much longer) list that included significant outright fraud.
Click to expand...

Yes, I already told you I was pointing out your hypocrisy. How many times do you want me to repeat it?
 
Deuce said:
Yes, I already told you I was pointing out your hypocrisy. How many times do you want me to repeat it?
Click to expand...

What hypocrisy? There are at least 3 meteorologists in the 500 skeptics list, while your 10,000 "Scientists" list has Mickey Mouse in it. If anyone is engaging in hypocrisy, its you.
 
PoS said:
What hypocrisy? There are at least 3 meteorologists in the 500 skeptics list, while your 10,000 "Scientists" list has Mickey Mouse in it. If anyone is engaging in hypocrisy, its you.
Click to expand...

The oregon petition has star wars characters on it
 
Jack Hays said:
What hypocrisy would that be?
Click to expand...

Attacking a list of names that has the same sorts of problems of lists you have previously defended.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom