• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Another Professor fired for telling the truth

1. No surprise, really!

2. We all know that only "woke" opinions are allowed at the universities and on the Internet.

3. So most of us simply keep our mouths shut at school, at work, and censor ourselves on the Internet.

That's just how the cookie crumbles.
 
Dr. Susan Crockford is a crock. She's not even an expert on polar bears or climate change, has no peer reviewed articles on the subject and is a climate change denier. Worse yet, she is the only source that the deniers use about polar bears. But don't dare challenge her work or you'll end up getting harassed by online deniers. Well, these scientists have simply had enough of Dr. Crock and the denier bloggers and trolls.

Climate Change Denialists Say Polar Bears Are Fine. Scientists Are Pushing Back. - The New York Times

She's a fraud. She wasn't even fired from her job because it wasn't a paying position to begin with...and she admits it in that video. The university simply didn't renew her position...and rightly so.
 
Last edited:
Tim the plumber said:
YouTube

If you tell the truth you can't even have an unpaid professorship.
Click to expand...

Leftists have very little tolerance for anyone reporting facts which contradict cherished leftist narratives. Polar bears are dying out, according to dummass leftists, no matter what actual researchers in the field report to the contrary.
 
TheParser said:
1. No surprise, really!

2. We all know that only "woke" opinions are allowed at the universities and on the Internet.

3. So most of us simply keep our mouths shut at school, at work, and censor ourselves on the Internet.

That's just how the cookie crumbles.
Click to expand...

Do you work in accedemia?
 
Moot said:
Dr. Susan Crockford is a crock. She's not even an expert on polar bears or climate change, has no peer reviewed articles on the subject and is a climate change denier. Worse yet, she is the only source that the deniers use about polar bears. But don't dare challenge her work or you'll end up getting harassed by online deniers. Well, these scientists have simply had enough of Dr. Crock and the denier bloggers and trolls.

Climate Change Denialists Say Polar Bears Are Fine. Scientists Are Pushing Back. - The New York Times

She's a fraud. She wasn't even fired from her job because it wasn't a paying position to begin with...and she admits it in that video. The university simply didn't renew her position...and rightly so.
Click to expand...

What does the data on polar bear numbers say?

I think it says that they are increasing.

If that is right would you change your view? If you found out that polar bear numbers were increasing would that alter your attitude to this?

What would change your view on the threat of CO2?
 
Moot said:
Dr. Susan Crockford is a crock. She's not even an expert on polar bears or climate change
Click to expand...
Please name the scientists in the IPCC or NASA who happen to have doctorates in climatology.
 
vegas giants said:
The worst bit of what? The worst effect of AGW?
Click to expand...

You seem to have a clue of a question. Why don't you answer that? What's the worst effect of AGW climate change?
 
vegas giants said:
The worst bit of what? The worst effect of AGW?
Click to expand...

It is truely unbelieveable how adverse you are to thinking at all.

Originally Posted by vegas giants View Post
Does this change your mind on the threat of co2?

Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Click to expand...


Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
No.

Maybe I am not seeing the really bad bit of all that. What would you see as the worst bit of it?
Click to expand...

[3]
 
Tim the plumber said:
It is truely unbelieveable how adverse you are to thinking at all.






[3]
Click to expand...

Well that depends where you are in the world. Let's start with the US


Northeast.*Heat waves, heavy downpours and sea level rise pose growing challenges to many aspects of life in the Northeast. Infrastructure, agriculture, fisheries and ecosystems will be increasingly compromised. Many states and cities are beginning to incorporate climate change into their planning.

Northwest.*Changes in the timing of streamflow reduce water supplies for competing demands. Sea level rise, erosion, inundation, risks to infrastructure and increasing ocean acidity pose major threats. Increasing wildfire, insect outbreaks and tree diseases are causing widespread tree die-off.

Southeast.*Sea level rise poses widespread and continuing threats to the region’s economy and environment. Extreme heat will affect health, energy, agriculture and more. Decreased water availability will have economic and environmental impacts.

Midwest.*Extreme heat, heavy downpours and flooding will affect infrastructure, health, agriculture, forestry, transportation, air and water quality, and more. Climate change will also exacerbate a range of risks to the Great Lakes.

Southwest.*Increased heat, drought and insect outbreaks, all linked to climate change, have increased wildfires. Declining water supplies, reduced agricultural yields, health impacts in cities due to heat, and flooding and erosion in coastal areas are additional concerns.
 
vegas giants said:
Well that depends where you are in the world. Let's start with the US


Northeast.*Heat waves, heavy downpours and sea level rise pose growing challenges to many aspects of life in the Northeast. Infrastructure, agriculture, fisheries and ecosystems will be increasingly compromised. Many states and cities are beginning to incorporate climate change into their planning.

Northwest.*Changes in the timing of streamflow reduce water supplies for competing demands. Sea level rise, erosion, inundation, risks to infrastructure and increasing ocean acidity pose major threats. Increasing wildfire, insect outbreaks and tree diseases are causing widespread tree die-off.

Southeast.*Sea level rise poses widespread and continuing threats to the region’s economy and environment. Extreme heat will affect health, energy, agriculture and more. Decreased water availability will have economic and environmental impacts.

Midwest.*Extreme heat, heavy downpours and flooding will affect infrastructure, health, agriculture, forestry, transportation, air and water quality, and more. Climate change will also exacerbate a range of risks to the Great Lakes.

Southwest.*Increased heat, drought and insect outbreaks, all linked to climate change, have increased wildfires. Declining water supplies, reduced agricultural yields, health impacts in cities due to heat, and flooding and erosion in coastal areas are additional concerns.
Click to expand...

A lot of that is water damage to the earth. Why don't you aspire to prevent water damage to the earth?

EDIT: BTW, every time it rains, the rains are sucked up into the clouds in a greenhouse gas...The most prevalent greenhouse gas.
 
vegas giants said:
Is that what you aspire to <to prevent water damage to the earth>?
Click to expand...
Yes...

EDIT: One doesn't necessarily limit or monitor CO2 to limit water damage to the earth.
 
cabse5 said:
Yes...

EDIT: One doesn't necessarily limit or monitor CO2 to limit water damage to the earth.
Click to expand...

But one can as a way to limit water damage
 
vegas giants said:
Well that depends where you are in the world. Let's start with the US


Northeast.*Heat waves, heavy downpours and sea level rise pose growing challenges to many aspects of life in the Northeast. Infrastructure, agriculture, fisheries and ecosystems will be increasingly compromised. Many states and cities are beginning to incorporate climate change into their planning.

Northwest.*Changes in the timing of streamflow reduce water supplies for competing demands. Sea level rise, erosion, inundation, risks to infrastructure and increasing ocean acidity pose major threats. Increasing wildfire, insect outbreaks and tree diseases are causing widespread tree die-off.

Southeast.*Sea level rise poses widespread and continuing threats to the region’s economy and environment. Extreme heat will affect health, energy, agriculture and more. Decreased water availability will have economic and environmental impacts.

Midwest.*Extreme heat, heavy downpours and flooding will affect infrastructure, health, agriculture, forestry, transportation, air and water quality, and more. Climate change will also exacerbate a range of risks to the Great Lakes.

Southwest.*Increased heat, drought and insect outbreaks, all linked to climate change, have increased wildfires. Declining water supplies, reduced agricultural yields, health impacts in cities due to heat, and flooding and erosion in coastal areas are additional concerns.
Click to expand...

Can you manage to read the link you posted and answer what you see as the worst thing in it? [5]
 
Tim the plumber said:
Can you manage to read the link you posted and answer what you see as the worst thing in it? [5]
Click to expand...

Hard to pick. There are so many. Maybe sea level rise but one could easily pick another one
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom