• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Over 500 Climate Scientists Declare There is no Climate Emergency

mrjurrs said:
So, no science work in half a century? His novels reflect science based ideas, not scientific research.
Click to expand...

Look, you gotta understand.

Jack is s not fuzzy on the difference between science and science fiction.

Just look at his cut and paste postings...
 
Jack Hays said:
I assume you're aware he passed away in 2008. Your opinion is noted.
Click to expand...

Didn't know that, wasn't a big fan then, not a big fan now. Condolences to those who miss him.
 
Threegoofs said:
Look, you gotta understand.

Jack is s not fuzzy on the difference between science and science fiction.

Just look at his cut and paste postings...
Click to expand...

As compared to your non-stop logical fallacies? Jack's evidence wins any day.
 
Tim the plumber said:

As you and Buzz are well aware he has yet to show any place where the cost of the adjustments needed as a result of a warmer world is more than that place spends on traffic lights.

Even Miami Beach will spend more on traffic lights than the increase it will spend on sea defenses.
Click to expand...

Well...I was out of town a couple of days ago and missed this. And this is an outright full-blown lie.
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Ignore Climate Hysteria: Brazil Set To Post Record Harvest[/h][FONT=&quot]From The GWPF Brazil’s 2019-20 grain and oilseed crops are poised to reach record production of 245.8mn metric tons (t), boosted by an increase in acreage and a recovery in the soybean crop, which will also likely break a record. The number would mark an increase of 1.6pc from the last cycle. The total area…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
Jack Hays said:
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Ignore Climate Hysteria: Brazil Set To Post Record Harvest[/h][FONT=&quot]From The GWPF Brazil’s 2019-20 grain and oilseed crops are poised to reach record production of 245.8mn metric tons (t), boosted by an increase in acreage and a recovery in the soybean crop, which will also likely break a record. The number would mark an increase of 1.6pc from the last cycle. The total area…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Ohlookablog

This time it’s touting an oil funded group.
 
Threegoofs said:
Just wait a few weeks.

He will make the same claim again.
Click to expand...

Yeah... I know. And when I see him do it again I will point out that it is a lie again.
 
Buzz said:
Well...I was out of town a couple of days ago and missed this. And this is an outright full-blown lie.
Click to expand...

Then show the numbers.

Remember that it is the sea level increase due to global warming, about 4 inches max over 30 years, that is the fraction of the overall height of the sea defenses being renewed, about 12 feet, that is the amount you have to compare to 30 years worth of traffic lights for Miami Beach. So Cost of sea defenses renewal, divided by 1080. If that number is higher than the traffic light budget you win.

But we both know it is not.
 
Last edited:
Tim the plumber said:
Then show the numbers.

Remember that it is the sea level increase due to global warming, about 4 inches max over 30 years, that is the fraction of the overall height of the sea defenses being renewed, about 12 feet, that is the amount you have to compare to 30 years worth of traffic lights for Miami Beach. So Cost of sea defenses renewal, divided by 1080. If that number is higher than the traffic light budget you win.

But we both know it is not.
Click to expand...

I have shown you the numbers several times now. One time you actually admitted I was correct. But that didn't last long because you just went and did some goal-post moving so you could keep your faith. I think this time will be your 4th or 5th goal-post move in the same debate. This is just ridiculous.

Oh... and your original challenge was specified to be based on the IPCC predictions. So your 4 inches over 30 is closer to the minimum predicted than the maximum.

And I don't know where you are getting this 12 feet from. I haven't seen it anywhere in any of the sources I have shown(or seen). As far as I can tell it is completely made up! Unless you can provide us some linkage?

Then there is your latest goal-post move where you suggest that "Cost of sea defenses renewal" be divided by 3240... Oh wait... you changed it to 1080.

:lamo

Both numbers are just crazy.

Face it, Tim. You lost your challenge and you need to come to terms with this reality. Otherwise, all you are doing is further discrediting yourself when you keep lying about it.
 
vegas giants said:
Of the 400 signatories, only a handful have a background in climate science, with the majority being writers, engineers and geologists with no direct expertise in the*field.
Click to expand...

Then your ignorance over those listed members of every IPCC report will bother you greatly.........................., once you find out that many are economists,engineers, geologists and that sort. Heck the current chairman of the IPCC has no science background at all, and the previous one was a railroad engineer......

:lamo
 
Sunsettommy said:
Then your ignorance over those listed members of every IPCC report will bother you greatly.........................., once you find out that many are economists,engineers, geologists and that sort. Heck the current chairman of the IPCC has no science background at all, and the previous one was a railroad engineer......

:lamo
Click to expand...

You think he drove Choo choo trains, or are you just intentionally pretending he’s not a trained mechanical engineer and PhD economist?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom