• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Over 500 Climate Scientists Declare There is no Climate Emergency

The GOP I needs to run on abortion, not protecting the environment and keeping Mexicans out of a Christian country

They've lost on everything else.
 
https://clintel.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ecd-press-briefing.pdf

https://clintel.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ED-brochureversieNWA4.pdf



Yup, so it looks like the usual fallacies that the climate nuts who claim "tens of thousands of scientists believe in a climate emergency" IS FAKE.

The truth is there are many scientists who are skeptical of the apocalypse. Fact.

Now let's see what fallacies the lemmings will come up with... probably ad homs, strawmen, shoot the messenger, argumentum ad populum, etc. which is their usual BS.

We already know climate change happens Regardless of Man's input to the environment. Upgrading infrastructure is providing for the general welfare.
 
Would you like to see the scientific evidence ?

I don't see how more ridicule will help...But go ahead try and amuse me. It takes a lot to get to me. After my divorce and a crazy lady with a gun (aka liberal), it takes a lot for me to be amused. Let me explain:

1. The Earth according to liberals is 4.5 billion years old.

2. Climate records are only one hundred 138 years old

3 That is one of thirty two million potential samples...Not enough evidence for me. But I'll play along for a govt contract right?

thebigfreeze.jpg


I believe now.
 
We already know climate change happens Regardless of Man's input to the environment. Upgrading infrastructure is providing for the general welfare.

How do you know this?....Insert ridicule here______________.
 
I don't see how more ridicule will help...But go ahead try and amuse me. It takes a lot to get to me. After my divorce and a crazy lady with a gun (aka liberal), it takes a lot for me to be amused. Let me explain:

1. The Earth according to liberals is 4.5 billion years old.

2. Climate records are only one hundred 138 years old

3 That is one of thirty two million potential samples...Not enough evidence for me. But I'll play along for a govt contract right?

View attachment 67265461


I believe now.

It is sad that you are being used by deniers. You clearly never read that article and got it from the nutty WUWT blog.



Here is the truth.


FACT CHECK: Is This Time Magazine Cover About 'Global Cooling'?
 
The GOP I needs to run on abortion, not protecting the environment and keeping Mexicans out of a Christian country

They've lost on everything else.

English please. You know proper wording, punctuation and all that. Can you list this "everything else" that they have lost on?
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Global Climate Intelligence Group founded[/h][FONT=&quot]By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley The Global Climate Intelligence Group, whose objective is to put the science back into climate science, comprises scientists, professionals and researchers from many nations, has already attracted some 500 signatures for what began life scant weeks ago as the European Climate Declaration. The group, and the declaration, are the brainchild…
[/FONT]

6 days ago September 28, 2019 in Climate Change Debate.
 
What is your opinion on blaming the right wing should we have to give our Statue of Liberty back to the French, because the right wing could not handle it?

Quelle est votre opinion sur le fait de blâmer la droite si nous devions rendre notre Statue de la Liberté aux Français, parce que la droite ne pourrait pas la gérer?
 
It appears that warmists arguments consist of various fallacies, and funding fallacies and little else.

Meanwhile that 500 list of people from various disciplines and often high education, gets no counterpoint at all. Their statement stands unchallenged...................

Carry on with your empty flailing, it is fun to watch.
 
Stop wriggling. Nobody claimed that every single scientist on the IPCC is a climate scientist, but you have claimed in the thread header that the signatories of this declaration are climate scientists. I have have already shown that the first signatory is not a climate scientist, thus proving you wrong. No doubt most of the other signatories are not climate scientists either, but one is sufficient to prove you wrong.

LOL youre the one who makes the claim that they all must be climate scientists, yet the IPCC and NASA are okay to have non-climate scientists on their staff? The hypocrisy meter just blew up.
 
It appears that warmists arguments consist of various fallacies, and funding fallacies and little else.

Meanwhile that 500 list of people from various disciplines and often high education, gets no counterpoint at all. Their statement stands unchallenged...................

Carry on with your empty flailing, it is fun to watch.

Yeah.....why should anyone listen to NASA. Lol
 
https://clintel.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ecd-press-briefing.pdf

https://clintel.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ED-brochureversieNWA4.pdf



Yup, so it looks like the usual fallacies that the climate nuts who claim "tens of thousands of scientists believe in a climate emergency" IS FAKE.

The truth is there are many scientists who are skeptical of the apocalypse. Fact.

Now let's see what fallacies the lemmings will come up with... probably ad homs, strawmen, shoot the messenger, argumentum ad populum, etc. which is their usual BS.
I am underder the impression that the science is settled. Bill nye says so and he is the science guy.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

From your link....

“The rise of the Extinction Rebellion movement, and the immense popularity and influence of Greta Thunberg, are having a significant impact on media coverage of climate change and concern about this issue. I would suspect that the aim of the campaign is to blunt the impact of these climate advocacy efforts.”

The talking points are stale and patently scientific nonsense. That isn’t critical. The point would be to keep the ‘contested’ nature of climate change alive.

climate-science-deniers-don-t-have-to-be-right-just-create-doubt-50-yea_u-l-q1bo4x20.jpg
 
Last edited:
Stop wriggling. Nobody claimed that every single scientist on the IPCC is a climate scientist, but you have claimed in the thread header that the signatories of this declaration are climate scientists. I have have already shown that the first signatory is not a climate scientist, thus proving you wrong. No doubt most of the other signatories are not climate scientists either, but one is sufficient to prove you wrong.

How many misses does it take to prove the climate models wrong?
 
I am underder the impression that the science is settled. Bill nye says so and he is the science guy.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Yes Even a TV "scientist" can understand why AGW is settled science. The evidence is both logical and overwhelming. We are actually witnessing it first hand and still some think they know better. It's like a flat earther and a moon landing skeptic had a baby, it was dropped on his head as a child and grew up to be a denier. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Yes Even a TV "scientist" can understand why AGW is settled science. The evidence is both logical and overwhelming. We are actually witnessing it first hand and still some think they know better. It's like a flat earther and a moon landing skeptic had a baby, it was dropped on his head as a child and grew up to be a denier. :lol:

LOL you completely missed the sarcasm in his post. Well done! :lamo
 
Yes Even a TV "scientist" can understand why AGW is settled science. The evidence is both logical and overwhelming. We are actually witnessing it first hand and still some think they know better. It's like a flat earther and a moon landing skeptic had a baby, it was dropped on his head as a child and grew up to be a denier. :lol:

Ah! Finally, somebody who can show me a place that will have significant trouble from a single factor of a warmewr world. Any place anywhere significant in the world.
 
Ah! Finally, somebody who can show me a place that will have significant trouble from a single factor of a warmewr world. Any place anywhere significant in the world.

New Orleans
 
Back
Top Bottom