• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AOC Supporter at Town Hall - We Need to Eat Babies

VySky

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
33,205
Reaction score
12,105
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Wow, there are no words

-VySky
====================

 
If cooked properly, dead babies make good eating.
 
If cooked properly, dead babies make good eating.

I sill can't believe what I heard in the video. And where was the outrage from AOC?

-VySky
 
Just goes to show that AGW is nothing but a religion- far worse than any other.
 
Bat **** crazy might be an understatement.
 
[h=2]“Climate Protection” Obsession Moves From Depression To Insanity…”Need To Eat Humans, Babies!”[/h]By P Gosselin on 4. October 2019
There’s little doubt among the many cooler skeptic heads that the global climate change movement has gone off the rails in terms of sanity, and continues to do so in a spectacular fashion.
The madness has arrived.
The latest example is presented to us by Ryan Saavedra of the Daily Caller. One of AOC’s constituents hysterically claims that eating humans, as suggested by one Swedish professor, isn’t going to cut it when it comes to rescuing the planet. Her solution:
“We need to eat the babies!”
Ryan Saavedra
@RealSaavedra





One of Ocasio-Cortez's constituents loses her mind over climate change during AOC's townhall, claims we only have a few months left: "We got to start eating babies! We don't have enough time! ... We have to get rid of the babies! ... We need to eat the babies!"








33.9K

19:57 - 3 Oct 2019
Twitter Ads information and privacy




31K people are talking about this











First, if I were a policeperson, I’d certainly would look to see if that insane woman might be missing any kids, or if her neighbors are missing any – seriously. If not, that poor woman needs psychiatric care very quickly.
One thing we note when we scan the faces in the crowd, is that they don’t show even an inkling of happiness at all. They are all frozen in depression, frustration and anger. If you’re in a good, happy mood, then standing less than 30 seconds in that room will change that. The hysterical woman shows that things are progressing from depression and anger to insanity.
How can people allow themselves to be talked nto depression, and later a level of insanity put on display by Ms. Baby-Eater?
It shouldn’t surprise us that when people like Greta and the lunatic media spread all the panic and fan the flames of irrationality, it’s just a question of time before those already on the fringes start falling off the deep end and potentially become a real danger.
Ms. Baby-Eater herself likely used to be one of those depressed, angry faces in the crowd. Then enter Greta and the media.
It’s also astonishing that AOC fields the question and comment as if it were a legitimate one. She should have simply just called the woman’s rant for what is was: utter lunacy. But then again, we live in times where very-late term abortions are okay!
I suspect this is just the beginning. Never underestimate the potential of human insanity, especially when it’s claimed to be backed by “science”. History is filled with such monumental tragedies.
It’s time to take the kooks out of the solution-making and handing that responsibility over to cooler heads.
 
Perhaps it was satire?

[h=1]AOC trolled by Swiftian satire[/h]Posted on 04 Oct 19 by PAUL MATTHEWS 2 Comments
This clip from an Ocasio-Cortez meeting in New York seems to have gone viral. A woman in the audience says “Your next campaign slogan has to be this: we’ve got to start eating babies, we don’t have enough time, there’s too much CO2…” She is quite convincing, and I confess that it took me a … Con
 
Soylent Green, Soylent Green

 
Wow, there are no words

-VySky
====================



I love me some BBQ baby ribs.

Either that girl is retarded or a plant.

Not sure the point of your thread? Your OP doesn't explain.

Edit - ah yes thank you Beefheart for clarifying it up. It's what I thought.
 
Crickets from the cultists....
 
Trumpers...you fell for a Lyndon LaRouche prank?

The LaRouche PAC has been running an “Eat the Children” campaign modeled on Jonathan Swift’s satirical 1729 essay A Modest Proposal, which attempted to highlight England’s exploitation of the impoverished Irish by suggesting that poor Irish families sell their children as food to wealthy landlords.

It's okay, your fearless leader's been eating babies for a while.

donald-trump-eating_baby.jpg

One of your Trump supporter wives gave him the idea:

ra4o3.jpg
 
One does have to wonder about their gullibility.

They fall for idiotic conspiracy theories every damn time. It's almost sad, but hilarious.:lol:
 


I think the one who really fell for it was AOC who was incapable of getting that girl to shut up - she spoke for quite a while - and then continued as if a valid point had been made.

:lamo
 
So let’s review: a woman suggests eating babies at an AOC event; AOC responds with what appears to be concern and compassion about her mental state; Trump and Trump Jr. believe the woman exemplifies AOC’s position, which position on the issue is shared by almost all the nations of the world; the incident turns out to be a prank. And we are asked to trust Trump’s and not AOC’s judgement by people like Carlson? Got it.
 
Putting down what you call Trumpers and saying anyone who responds is a cultist, makes it with reservations that a conservative would reply, but I'm here for you.

Realize that that out of the first nine responses one was neutral (cartoon), two were from the OP, the OP and a response, and five were left leaning. So who was biting on this? It was not until post #10 by Jack Hays that it was recognized for what it is.
 
Crazy Republican pretends to be crazy left wing baby eating eco nut to prove AOC supporters are crazy.

Jack Hays raises to performance art. Normalizing street corner professional sign holders is not something you want to do.

607cca6ff64d311d46365042340728ec.gif


Sent from the Matrioshka in the WH Christmas tree.
 
Last edited:
Putting down what you call Trumpers and saying anyone who responds is a cultist, makes it with reservations that a conservative would reply, but I'm here for you.

Realize that that out of the first nine responses one was neutral (cartoon), two were from the OP, the OP and a response, and five were left leaning. So who was biting on this? It was not until post #10 by Jack Hays that it was recognized for what it is.

You guys eat up all the crazy stuff, and it makes you all look foolish.
 
Back
Top Bottom