• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is NASA wrong?

V

vegas giants

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
122,485
Reaction score
19,845
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
NASA has an entire page devoted to the effects of climate change.

Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Is this information correct? Can anyone claim it is wrong?


And if it is wrong....how did they get it wrong?


Be aware NASA is run by a trump appointee who was a former AGW denier. Trump could insist this page be taken down tomorrow and that would be completely within his power. But he does not.
 
vegas giants said:
NASA has an entire page devoted to the effects of climate change.

Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Is this information correct? Can anyone claim it is wrong?


And if it is wrong....how did they get it wrong?


Be aware NASA is run by a trump appointee who was a former AGW denier. Trump could insist this page be taken down tomorrow and that would be completely within his power. But he does not.
Click to expand...

NASA and NOAA and the British Antarctic Survey and nearly every research university in the world are wrong and probably deliberately lying. You can only trust blogs by retired weathermen and secretly-funded websites. Besides, global warming isn't caused by people. And global warming is a natural process. Also, it's too late to do anything about it anyway.
So there.
 
vegas giants said:
NASA has an entire page devoted to the effects of climate change.

Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Is this information correct? Can anyone claim it is wrong?


And if it is wrong....how did they get it wrong?


Be aware NASA is run by a trump appointee who was a former AGW denier. Trump could insist this page be taken down tomorrow and that would be completely within his power. But he does not.
Click to expand...
If they said something definitive then they might be wrong, but they did not say anything definitive!
 
Grand Mal said:
NASA and NOAA and the British Antarctic Survey and nearly every research university in the world are wrong and probably deliberately lying. You can only trust blogs by retired weathermen and secretly-funded websites. Besides, global warming isn't caused by people. And global warming is a natural process. Also, it's too late to do anything about it anyway.
So there.
Click to expand...

Maybe I should just trust a guy on here who just did the math himself? Maybe he could give me some advice on heart disease too
 
vegas giants said:
NASA has an entire page devoted to the effects of climate change.

Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Is this information correct? Can anyone claim it is wrong?


And if it is wrong....how did they get it wrong?


Be aware NASA is run by a trump appointee who was a former AGW denier. Trump could insist this page be taken down tomorrow and that would be completely within his power. But he does not.
Click to expand...

Why would anyone believe Never A Straight Answer after they hoaxed the moon landings?

:mrgreen:
 
vegas giants said:
Maybe I should just trust a guy on here who just did the math himself? Maybe he could give me some advice on heart disease too
Click to expand...

Of course!

The internet's like the Bible. If you look long enough you can find affirmation for any crackpot idea.
 
longview said:
Please point out in their link where they say what ECS for doubling the CO2 level will be?
Click to expand...

Dude they have an entire page that lists devastating effects of AGW.


An entire page!!!!!
 
vegas giants said:
Dude they have an entire page that lists devastating effects of AGW.


An entire page!!!!!
Click to expand...
The effects of AGW mean nothing if the link between increases in CO2 and those devastating effects is not established by a scientific process.
 
longview said:
The effects of AGW mean nothing if the link between increases in CO2 and those devastating effects is not established by a scientific process.
Click to expand...

And yet they post those effects. For everyone to see
 
vegas giants said:
NASA has an entire page devoted to the effects of climate change.

Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Is this information correct? Can anyone claim it is wrong?


And if it is wrong....how did they get it wrong?


Be aware NASA is run by a trump appointee who was a former AGW denier. Trump could insist this page be taken down tomorrow and that would be completely within his power. But he does not.
Click to expand...

From the first page of your link: "... more intense heat waves...."

That's BS, did you ever read about the 1930's Dust Bowl?

Here's a link to the EPA's Heat Wave Index
https://www.epa.gov/sites/productio...lic/2016-07/high-low-temps-download1-2016.png
 
vegas giants said:
NASA has an entire page devoted to the effects of climate change.

Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Is this information correct? Can anyone claim it is wrong?


And if it is wrong....how did they get it wrong?


Be aware NASA is run by a trump appointee who was a former AGW denier. Trump could insist this page be taken down tomorrow and that would be completely within his power. But he does not.
Click to expand...

Actually, what's scary is that the scientists that work for the whitehouse put out a report last year talking about potential economic and public damages from climate change. It was on the internet for a while. But now it's gone.

Scary stuff indeed.
 
vegas giants said:
NASA has an entire page devoted to the effects of climate change.

Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Is this information correct? Can anyone claim it is wrong?


And if it is wrong....how did they get it wrong?


Be aware NASA is run by a trump appointee who was a former AGW denier. Trump could insist this page be taken down tomorrow and that would be completely within his power. But he does not.
Click to expand...

Yes that you have now a president that have claimed that climate change is a Chinese hoax.

Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive."

So it really good that Jim Bridenstine, the head of NASA stand up for science.

Trump's NASA Chief Changed His Mind on Climate Change. He Is a Scientific Hero. | Space

Also deniers can't even agree on if there will be global cooling or global warming.

The 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change are all flawed — Quartz

So NASA could get a lot more funding to come up with one alternative theory to manmade global warming. Especially during the two years the Republicans controlled both the White House and the two chambers of congress. So it shows how overwhelming the evidence is then NASA continues to acknowledge the urgent need for action.
 
The fact the Bridenstine's opinion on climate change changed having seen the facts gives me a glimmer of hope.
 
vegas giants said:
NASA has an entire page devoted to the effects of climate change.

Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Is this information correct? Can anyone claim it is wrong?


And if it is wrong....how did they get it wrong?


Be aware NASA is run by a trump appointee who was a former AGW denier. Trump could insist this page be taken down tomorrow and that would be completely within his power. But he does not.
Click to expand...

From the first page of your link:

The potential future effects of global climate change include more frequent wildfires,​

Here's the a forest service chart of forest fires (That's what we used to call them you know):

figure16-1.JPG
 
vegas giants said:
That's nice.


Is NASA wrong?
Click to expand...


AProudLefty said:
You don't know what that means. Asking if it's wrong and show how or why it's wrong is not an appeal to authority.
Click to expand...

You both automatically believe NASA is right- so yes, it is an appeal to authority fallacy- a textbook case, in fact. Congratulations.
 
PoS said:
You both automatically believe NASA is right- so yes, it is an appeal to authority fallacy- a textbook case, in fact. Congratulations.
Click to expand...

So you believe NASA is wrong? Is that your position?


Just man up
 
PoS said:
You both automatically believe NASA is right- so yes, it is an appeal to authority fallacy- a textbook case, in fact. Congratulations.
Click to expand...

No I didn't. Grats for misrepresenting my position. Now can you explain to the OP how or why NASA is wrong? Be specific and cite sources. Many years has passed and nobody could meet the challenge. Can you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom