- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,342
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Scientists skeptical of the current AGW advocacy campaign and climate hysteria have taken steps to organize their resistance. This should surprise no one.
Global Climate Intelligence Group founded
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley The Global Climate Intelligence Group, whose objective is to put the science back into climate science, comprises scientists, professionals and researchers from many nations, has already attracted some 500 signatures for what began life scant weeks ago as the European Climate Declaration. The group, and the declaration, are the brainchild…
Continue reading →
[FONT="]. . . The declaration says –[/FONT]
[FONT="]There is no climate emergency[/FONT]
[FONT="]A global network of 500 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to global warming, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation. . . .[/FONT]
Global Climate Intelligence Group founded
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley The Global Climate Intelligence Group, whose objective is to put the science back into climate science, comprises scientists, professionals and researchers from many nations, has already attracted some 500 signatures for what began life scant weeks ago as the European Climate Declaration. The group, and the declaration, are the brainchild…
Continue reading →
[FONT="]. . . The declaration says –[/FONT]
[FONT="]There is no climate emergency[/FONT]
[FONT="]A global network of 500 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to global warming, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation. . . .[/FONT]