• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AOC says Miami will not exists in a few years, if we do not do something about climate change.

aociswundumho said:
If I wanted the opinion of some ditzy bartender I'd go down to my local tavern.
Click to expand...

And I bet you wouldn't listen to a word she says and would instead be checking out her ass...
 
AProudLefty said:
How is it my fault? I didn't make the claim. The claim made by him was that we want to ban airplanes, fossil fuels, burgers and cow farts. When he couldn't provide the evidence, he attempted to make this about me.
Click to expand...
Now we seem to have a reading issue. He asked you how to get to carbon neutral and you post this.
 
Jay59 said:
Now we seem to have a reading issue. He asked you how to get to carbon neutral and you post this.
Click to expand...

Sighs. It's soooooo easy. I asked him to give me evidence for his claim. He turns it around on me and ask how would I solve the problem as if it proves his claim. It's a fallacy. You seem intelligent. You can figure it out.

Person 1: Democrats.want to ban cow farts
Person 2: Ok give me evidence of that
Person 1: How will YOU be able to reduce emission!? See I win.
 
AProudLefty said:
Sighs. It's soooooo easy. I asked him to give me evidence for his claim. He turns it around on me and ask how would I solve the problem as if it proves his claim. It's a fallacy. You seem intelligent. You can figure it out.

Person 1: Democrats.want to ban cow farts
Person 2: Ok give me evidence of that
Person 1: How will YOU be able to reduce emission!? See I win.
Click to expand...
I have to give it to you, person 1 wins that argument.
 
Jay59 said:
I have to give it to you, person 1 wins that argument.
Click to expand...

Are you trying to be funny? He wins the argument because he didn't provide any evidence but asked a question?
 
AProudLefty said:
Are you trying to be funny? He wins the argument because he didn't provide any evidence but asked a question?
Click to expand...
You were trying to be a wit and only managed half.
 
AProudLefty said:
Oh no no don't turn the table around. You made the claim. YOU give us the evidence. How we solve the problem isn't the issue.
Click to expand...

Bull****. You made a claim that something needs to be done to lower CO2 emissions, so you need to show us what needs to happen. How to make it happen is the issue.

Jay59 said:
You were trying to be a wit and only managed half.
Click to expand...

LOL climate jihadists arent very smart, are they? The moment you press them for any details they chicken out. :lol:
 
Last edited:
PoS said:
Bull****. You made a claim that something needs to be done to lower CO2 emissions, so you need to show us what needs to happen.
Click to expand...

Quote me then.
 
AProudLefty said:
Quote me then.
Click to expand...

AProudLefty said:
Why do people believe in that drivel? Nobody is going to ban airplanes, burgers, fossil fuels and cow farts. They need to grow up.
Click to expand...

Now, if you claim that these things wont be done, what's your alternative plan to achieve carbon neutrality. Go on, genius. Let's hear your plan.
 
PoS said:
Now, if you claim that these things wont be done, what's your alternative plan to achieve carbon neutrality. Go on, genius. Let's hear your plan.
Click to expand...

You made the claim. It's on you to support your claim.

As for the carbon neutrality, we can ask Japan.


Meanwhile, we'll wait for you to provide one evidence for your claim.
 
AProudLefty said:
You made the claim. It's on you to support your claim.

As for the carbon neutrality, we can ask Japan.


Meanwhile, we'll wait for you to provide one evidence for your claim.
Click to expand...

Chickening out again, as expected. But I'll humor you.

Extinction Rebellion: What do they want and is it realistic? - BBC News

Researchers at Zero Carbon Britain suggested that if the UK wanted to get to net zero by 2030, Britain would need to get about 130 gigawatts of electricity from wind, meaning around 13,000 extra wind turbines off shore. This would take up an area twice the size of Wales. The UK would also need about 7 gigwatts of onshore wind, meaning another 3,500 turbines.

There would also have to be significant dietary changes, with people cutting back on meat and dairy.

Flying would have to be restricted. Severely.

"You could have an air flight every couple of years, but we can't allow the world to continue flying for hen parties in New York every couple of weeks," said Paul Allen who co-ordinates the Zero Carbon Britain research project.

"The numbers don't stack up. We can't do this, we have to be honest with ourselves."
Click to expand...

This is what your side wants. So what's your alternative?

Japan is carbon neutral? LMAO. Prove it.
 
AProudLefty said:
An article from BBC which is in England proves your claim that AOC wants airplanes, burgers and cow farts banned?

Prove what about Japan? You mean high speed train for example?
Click to expand...

Goes to show you didnt even read it. I proved my case, and you chicken out again. We already know you are clueless about this whole thing so admit it.

Show me links that says Japan is carbon neutral. PROVE IT.
 
PoS said:
Goes to show you didnt even read it. I proved my case, and you chicken out again. We already know you are clueless about this whole thing so admit it.

Show me links that says Japan is carbon neutral. PROVE IT.
Click to expand...

Chicken out of what exactly? I've already gave you an eample - high speed train instead of air travel.
 
AProudLefty said:
Chicken out of what exactly? I've already gave you an eample - high speed train instead of air travel.
Click to expand...

High speed trains across the oceans? :lamo

LOL thanks for proving how completely clueless you are. Its clear you dont even know what carbon neutrality is. Next time, stick to threads you know about, like how to get welfare handouts.
 
PoS said:
High speed trains across the oceans? :lamo

LOL thanks for proving how completely clueless you are. Its clear you dont even know what carbon neutrality is. Next time, stick to threads you know about, like how to get welfare handouts.
Click to expand...

Eh? High speed trains across the oceans? You're losing it now.
 
Moot said:
A bar tender that graduated cum lade with a degree in international relations and economics.

I'd take her opinion over the low information rightwinger any day of the week.
Click to expand...

cum lade?
 
AProudLefty said:
Oh no no don't turn the table around. You made the claim. YOU give us the evidence. How we solve the problem isn't the issue.
Click to expand...

Carbon neutrality will not contain climate change since CO2 is less than 5 percent of all greenhouse gases. Heck, the heavy rains we've received in the Midwest are driving up temperatures more than CO2 ever could. What are ya gonna do about the rain, man, and the ensuing increase of greenhouse gases in the 'sphere?
 
Last edited:
True carbon neutrality could be achieved, but it would not make the alarmist happy.
In the US we would need a massive increase in solar power, and an additional 1300 Nuclear power plants.
The massive surpluses, would be stored as carbon neutral hydrocarbon fuels, the type based on demand.
Planes would fly, with man made jet fuel, and all the CO2 emitted would have been captured from the Atmosphere.
P.S. this is much more likely than people not flying.
 
cabse5 said:
Carbon neutrality will not contain climate change since CO2 is less than 5 percent of all greenhouse gases. Heck, the heavy rains we've received in the Midwest are driving up temperatures more than CO2 ever could. What are ya gonna do about the rain, man, and the ensuing increase of greenhouse gases in the 'sphere?
Click to expand...

Why do people keep asking me that? I am not a congressman.
 
Moot said:
Oh lade, did I mispell a woid?!?.
Click to expand...

Wasn't sure if your intent was to be derogatory or not.
Cum Laude would place her in the lower half of the top 30%.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom