- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 106,839
- Reaction score
- 98,881
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I don't think that fear is irrational. Full EVs means you need to have an extra vehicle for anything longer than local commuting.
I already said that this is ideal for most families with two cars, if only for convenience. But for every household with two cars, there's no sense in not having one of the cars be an EV.
Plug in stations aren't available everywhere
For practical purposes they are. The only exceptions are large mountain ranges, forests, and deserts for sight-seeing purposes where you can expect ranges of up to 150-200 miles. For anybody who's just interested in getting from point A to point B and don't want to sight-see overly much, there are plugin stations wherever you need them (at least within the state of CA).
and no one wants to sit around for hours between charges.
Yes, this is the one objective inconvenience, and why each household would be wise to have at least one hybrid in addition to an EV.
Plug-in hybrids are the way to go. Gives you enough range for most local driving to remain full electric but you can also take trips.
In immediate local driving, sure, but a plug-in hybrid has a battery range of 25 miles. And I've done a lot more commuting and errand driving in a day than that. If my goal is to avoid carbon emissions, I'm not sure that's the way to go. If emissions-free driving is even remotely a concern, a full-on EV is better because it has a range of ~200 miles, which is perfectly sufficient for a day's worth of commuting and errands.