• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

IPCC scientist on sea level rise and fall

Tim the plumber

Tim the plumber

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
16,501
Reaction score
3,829
Location
Sheffield
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
YouTube

IPCC scientist on sea level rise and fall.

Interesting. He seems to agree with my guess of a possible sea level drop if anything.
 
Your sample size is one. :)
 
Tim the plumber said:
YouTube

IPCC scientist on sea level rise and fall.

Interesting. He seems to agree with my guess of a possible sea level drop if anything.
Click to expand...

He stuttered so much, that I question his current mental capacity. His handshake was quite pretentious. He made very little sense. He didn't even talk about warmer expanding oceans.
 
Media_Truth said:
He stuttered so much, that I question his current mental capacity. His handshake was quite pretentious. He made very little sense. He didn't even talk about warmer expanding oceans.
Click to expand...

I have watched the first 9 minutes to where they are discussing Consensus. No evidence of stuttering and clearly coherent the entire time.


Not only that you again attack the person and, not what is talked about, which indicate you as usual have no counterpoint to sell.

I question your moral integrity when you make up stuff that can be found only in YOUR dreamland.
 
Sunsettommy said:
I have watched the first 9 minutes to where they are discussing Consensus. No evidence of stuttering and clearly coherent the entire time.


Not only that you again attack the person and, not what is talked about, which indicate you as usual have no counterpoint to sell.

I question your moral integrity when you make up stuff that can be found only in YOUR dreamland.
Click to expand...

Maybe my ear was vibrating, and he really wasn't stuttering. :lamo I mentioned content - not once did he mention warmer temperatures of an expanding ocean. I would think that's the first thing any "scientist" would mention. Bottom line - facts speak louder than words...

Sea_Level_Rise_World_Map.jpg
 
Media_Truth said:
Maybe my ear was vibrating, and he really wasn't stuttering. :lamo I mentioned content - not once did he mention warmer temperatures of an expanding ocean. I would think that's the first thing any "scientist" would mention. Bottom line - facts speak louder than words...

View attachment 67259063
Click to expand...

You must have been watching a different video, the one in Post 1 is this:

UN IPCC Scientist Debunks UN IPCC Lies

Still no counterpoint against anything he talked about, you are 0-2 now.

Your strawman try against Dr. Morner is noted, you tried to lambast him on something not mentioned, while ignoring many talking points he did bring up. Don't do it again.

:2wave:
 
Sunsettommy said:
You must have been watching a different video, the one in Post 1 is this:

UN IPCC Scientist Debunks UN IPCC Lies

Still no counterpoint against anything he talked about, you are 0-2 now.

Your strawman try against Dr. Morner is noted, you tried to lambast him on something not mentioned, while ignoring many talking points he did bring up. Don't do it again.

:2wave:
Click to expand...

That's fine - go ahead and listen to lies and half-truths. That's your thing. You'll listen to the first guy that comes along that supports the false narrative. Ignore the vast majority of experts worldwide. That's your thing. :peace
 
Media_Truth said:
That's fine - go ahead and listen to lies and half-truths. That's your thing. You'll listen to the first guy that comes along that supports the false narrative. Ignore the vast majority of experts worldwide. That's your thing. :peace
Click to expand...

You are now 0-3.

:2wave:
 
Media_Truth said:
He stuttered so much, that I question his current mental capacity. His handshake was quite pretentious. He made very little sense. He didn't even talk about warmer expanding oceans.
Click to expand...

But he did talk about the overall effect of a warmer climate period on sea level; it falls a small bit.
 
Media_Truth said:
That's fine - go ahead and listen to lies and half-truths. That's your thing. You'll listen to the first guy that comes along that supports the false narrative. Ignore the vast majority of experts worldwide. That's your thing. :peace
Click to expand...

He is the world's best expert as chosen by the IPCC. Then they would not listen to him.
 
Surface Detail said:
Why does he think that thermal expansion of sea water and melting land ice won't raise the sea level?
Click to expand...

Maybe, just maybe, there might be factors which cause the sea level to drop even though those factors add some to sea level.

Perhaps the additional precipitation will cause the water table to rise over vast areas such as central Asia. After all expansion is likely to account for 7cm per degree rise by 2100. And maybe he thinks that the accumulation of ice mass on Antarctica and Greenland is greater than any melt is going to be.
 
Tim the plumber said:
Maybe, just maybe, there might be factors which cause the sea level to drop even though those factors add some to sea level.

Perhaps the additional precipitation will cause the water table to rise over vast areas such as central Asia. After all expansion is likely to account for 7cm per degree rise by 2100. And maybe he thinks that the accumulation of ice mass on Antarctica and Greenland is greater than any melt is going to be.
Click to expand...

It that what he claims? What makes him so sure that precipitation will increase by the required amount in central Asia? Why does he think that ice accumulation on Greenland and Antarctica will outpace melting? This hasn't been the case so far.
 
Surface Detail said:
It that what he claims? What makes him so sure that precipitation will increase by the required amount in central Asia? Why does he think that ice accumulation on Greenland and Antarctica will outpace melting? This hasn't been the case so far.
Click to expand...

I don't know what he thinks I was supplying some possible answers.

If you want to discuss what I believe is likely to happen and why I expect there to be a slight sea level drop, of the order of 0 to 40cm, fine but that should be a different thread.
 
Tim the plumber said:
One professor of climate science who was on the IPCC.
Click to expand...

Thousands of climate scientists: "The climate is in trouble and we need to take immediate steps to prevent out-of-control change."
Deniers: "La-la-la-la can't hear you!"
One climate scientist: "The data gives no clear indication one way or the other."
Deniers: "See? Climate change is a hoax!"
 
Phys251 said:
Thousands of climate scientists: "The climate is in trouble and we need to take immediate steps to prevent out-of-control change."
Deniers: "La-la-la-la can't hear you!"
One climate scientist: "The data gives no clear indication one way or the other."
Deniers: "See? Climate change is a hoax!"
Click to expand...

One professor who was part of the IPCC;

They will not discuss the science and there is no problem!!

Rest of the evidence provided by people such as you;

Look all the scientists say there is a problem but I am not going to explain what it is you will have to take the word of people who nobody has any idea who they actually are!!! But they are right!!!! Denier!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Phys251 said:
You obviously do not accept the scientific consensus on climate change. Please provide us with the studies that you yourself have published so that we may see how they falsify all of climate science. :)
Click to expand...

Neither you nor I have published such studies.

The closest either of us has come would be my posting on here the explanation of how day length data shows that the poles are not losing ice mass using rotational dynamics. But that is very basic and has been done far more thoroughly by proper scientists.

Why do you think that you have the right to hold your opinions out as unquestionable doctrine and others do not get to challenge them unless they have such papers?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom