• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Michael Mann's Bad Behavior

Jay59 said:
You called him a liar, which is different. Cite the lie. Explain why it is untrue. Cite evidence to support your claim. When you cite a site also give quotes. Otherwise you get like Mann and Curry behaving like 10-year-olds in the schoolyard.
Click to expand...

Already explained. And Curry =/= Mann in this case. I need no guidance from you.
 
During the late 20th century, Michael Mann and colleagues published research showing that then recent warming, believed to have been caused by human caused changes in atmospheric chemistry, were indeed large and unique over a very long natural record of about a thousand years. The graph showed what looked like a hockey stick laying down, with the blade, sticking abruptly up, indicating the dramatic increase in average surface temperature of the planet. See this book for an overview of the climate science.

Over subsequent decades, a handful of individuals, organizations, and at least one media outlet decided to attack Mann over his research. These attacks falsely claimed that Mann had faked or altered data in order to show that global warming was real when it wasn’t. To be clear: Global warming is real, and Mann was not making up or faking data. See The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines for more on that. See also this book for just how crazy this can all get.

Mann, in an effort to defend the science, took these various and sundryD633F1AD-D4D8-4F36-9050-9841CEC70A0F.jpgentities to court, to compel them to retract their lies and apologize. Today, June 7th, one of those law suits ended with such an apology.

Michael Mann Wins - Greg Laden's Blog
 
Birdzeye said:
During the late 20th century, Michael Mann and colleagues published research showing that then recent warming, believed to have been caused by human caused changes in atmospheric chemistry, were indeed large and unique over a very long natural record of about a thousand years. The graph showed what looked like a hockey stick laying down, with the blade, sticking abruptly up, indicating the dramatic increase in average surface temperature of the planet. See this book for an overview of the climate science.

Over subsequent decades, a handful of individuals, organizations, and at least one media outlet decided to attack Mann over his research. These attacks falsely claimed that Mann had faked or altered data in order to show that global warming was real when it wasn’t. To be clear: Global warming is real, and Mann was not making up or faking data. See The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines for more on that. See also this book for just how crazy this can all get.

Mann, in an effort to defend the science, took these various and sundryView attachment 67258903entities to court, to compel them to retract their lies and apologize. Today, June 7th, one of those law suits ended with such an apology.

Michael Mann Wins - Greg Laden's Blog
Click to expand...

Hmm. Everyone else’s bad behavior towards Mann.

Gee. Not qiuite consistent with the denier story.
 
Birdzeye said:
During the late 20th century, Michael Mann and colleagues published research showing that then recent warming, believed to have been caused by human caused changes in atmospheric chemistry, were indeed large and unique over a very long natural record of about a thousand years. The graph showed what looked like a hockey stick laying down, with the blade, sticking abruptly up, indicating the dramatic increase in average surface temperature of the planet. See this book for an overview of the climate science.

Over subsequent decades, a handful of individuals, organizations, and at least one media outlet decided to attack Mann over his research. These attacks falsely claimed that Mann had faked or altered data in order to show that global warming was real when it wasn’t. To be clear: Global warming is real, and Mann was not making up or faking data. See The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines for more on that. See also this book for just how crazy this can all get.

Mann, in an effort to defend the science, took these various and sundryView attachment 67258903entities to court, to compel them to retract their lies and apologize. Today, June 7th, one of those law suits ended with such an apology.

Michael Mann Wins - Greg Laden's Blog
Click to expand...

Threegoofs said:
Hmm. Everyone else’s bad behavior towards Mann.

Gee. Not qiuite consistent with the denier story.
Click to expand...

Mann will almost certainly lose his case against Mark Steyn, which is why he has been at ease with lengthy delays.
 
[h=3]Mann vs. Steyn likely to head to Supreme Court | Watts Up With That?[/h]
[url]https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/02/.../mann-vs-steyn-likely-to-head-to-supreme-cou...
[/URL]



Feb 14, 2019 - There was some modest activity yesterday in the Mann vs Steyn ..... this suit can be found by searching “mann lawsuit” in WUWT search field.



[h=3]CEI Asks Supreme Court to Hear Michael Mann Defamation Case ...[/h]
[url]https://cei.org/content/cei-asks-supreme-court-hear-michael-mann-defamation-case
[/URL]



May 23, 2019 - “The D.C. Court of Appeals' decision in CEI v. ... His demands were rejected and Mann sued for libel in D.C. Superior Court in October, 2012.


 
Jack Hays said:
Mann will almost certainly lose his case against Mark Steyn, which is why he has been at ease with lengthy delays.
Click to expand...

Yes, we are familiar with your completely stupid theory that Mann ‘knows’ he will lose his lawsuit against Steyn, and is afraid of it, so he is intentionally delaying it.
 
Threegoofs said:
Yes, we are familiar with your completely stupid theory that Mann ‘knows’ he will lose his lawsuit against Steyn, and is afraid of it, so he is intentionally delaying it.
Click to expand...

[h=3]Press groups file amici curiae brief in 'Mann v. Steyn' defamation lawsuit[/h]
[url]https://www.whistleblower.org/.../press-groups-file-amici-curiae-brief-in-mann-v-stey...
[/URL]



Oct 26, 2018 - The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 26 other organizations filed an amici curiae brief on August 11 with the DC Court of ...
 
Threegoofs said:
Yes, we are familiar with your completely stupid theory that Mann ‘knows’ he will lose his lawsuit against Steyn, and is afraid of it, so he is intentionally delaying it.
Click to expand...

[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]​
 
Jay59 said:
You called him a liar, which is different. Cite the lie. Explain why it is untrue. Cite evidence to support your claim. When you cite a site also give quotes. Otherwise you get like Mann and Curry behaving like 10-year-olds in the schoolyard.
Click to expand...
@Birdzeye There are two in the schoolyard. I hold Jack to a higher standard.
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Climate Extremists Plan to Attack Airport with Small Drones[/h][FONT=&quot]Guest essay by Eric Worrall h/t Breitbart – Eco extremists have openly admitted plans to shut down Heathrow by flying drones in controlled airspace, to terrorise authorities into suspending flight operations. Exclusive: How Extinction Rebellion Plans To Shut Heathrow Airport Down Document reveals how climate change activists will use drones to organise mass disruption lasting…
[/FONT]
2 days ago July 6, 2019 in Climate ugliness.
 
The fake Nobelist loses in court.

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]BREAKING – Dr. Tim Ball wins @MichaelEMann lawsuit – Mann has to pay[/h][FONT=&quot]Readers surely recall that the easily offended Dr. Michael Mann launched a court case for defamation against climate skeptic Dr. Tim Ball of Canada. In Feburary 2018 there was a complete dismissal in the lawsuit brought against Dr. Ball by Andrew Weaver of Canada, also for “defamation”. The Weaver defamation case involved an article Ball…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
Jack Hays said:
The fake Nobelist loses in court.

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]BREAKING – Dr. Tim Ball wins @MichaelEMann lawsuit – Mann has to pay[/h][FONT=&quot]Readers surely recall that the easily offended Dr. Michael Mann launched a court case for defamation against climate skeptic Dr. Tim Ball of Canada. In Feburary 2018 there was a complete dismissal in the lawsuit brought against Dr. Ball by Andrew Weaver of Canada, also for “defamation”. The Weaver defamation case involved an article Ball…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Yeah, I remember the deniers crowing about the last ‘victory’... LOL

Judge Dismisses Libel Claim, Climate 'Sceptic' Tim Ball Not Credible Enough To Take Seriously | DeSmogBlog
 
mann-vs-ball-winner.jpg
 
Threegoofs said:
Reminder... the case was thrown out in Feb because the judge said ‘no reasonable person’ would take an idiot like Tim Ball seriously.

And the deniers claimed victory! LOL
Click to expand...

Cherry picking a single comment from the full context?

Typical!
 
Threegoofs said:
Reminder... the case was thrown out in Feb because the judge said ‘no reasonable person’ would take an idiot like Tim Ball seriously.

And the deniers claimed victory! LOL
Click to expand...

The February dismissal was a different case.
 
Jack Hays said:
The fake Nobelist will pay the court costs.
Click to expand...

I guess he needs to make more doomsday predictions in order to get more money to pay for the court case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom