• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arctic Ocean and Greenland ice sheet see record June melting

Threegoofs said:
Well, why wouldn’t he cite that instead of the piece of crap that he linked?
Click to expand...

Because it's paywalled. Most people can only read the abstract. I however can read the whole article, methodologies, and supplements.

Just saying, most the stuff Jack links has reputable sources. Most the stuff you and others are a total joke, with no valid source links.
 
Lord of Planar said:
Because it's paywalled. Most people can only read the abstract. I however can read the whole article, methodologies, and supplements.

Just saying, most the stuff Jack links has reputable sources. Most the stuff you and others are a total joke, with no valid source links.
Click to expand...

LOL.

It’s crap and you know it.

If the article is significant, it’s probably been discussed on a science site.
 
Threegoofs said:
LOL.

It’s crap and you know it.

If the article is significant, it’s probably been discussed on a science site.
Click to expand...

Denial of science once again on your part!
 
Lord of Planar said:
Because it's paywalled. Most people can only read the abstract. I however can read the whole article, methodologies, and supplements.
Click to expand...

Hey Lord... have you ever noticed when you are reading the articles, methodologies, and supplements for Jack's postings about geothermal heat melting ice... that the amounts of heat are measured in the milliwatts per square meter?

Do you realize that this amount of heat is a drop in the bucket when compared to the amount of heat absorbed by the surface?

Probably not.
 
You are also seeing a drastic decline in arctic sea ice.

 
longview said:
And what does sea ice volume have to do with albedo, would not that be area not volume?
Click to expand...

I'm only pointing out that their history based on satellites is too short of a period.
 
Lord of Planar said:
I'm only pointing out that their history based on satellites is too short of a period.
Click to expand...
Very limited period, but the volume is very different than the area, In theory the volume could decrease, without any change in area,
but albedo would be strictly tied to area not volume.
 
Jack Hays said:
[h=2]Glaciers Don’t Lie, But Climate Scientists Do[/h][FONT="]Posted on [URL="https://realclimatescience.com/2019/10/glaciers-dont-lie-but-climate-scientists-do/"]October 14, 2019[/URL] by tonyheller[/FONT]
Almost all of the world’s glaciers were retreating in 1910. NASA says earth was cooling and record cold at the time.
Click to expand...

Facts and “realclimatescience” are as compatible as communism and capitalism. Amirite?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom