• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arctic Ocean and Greenland ice sheet see record June melting

3goof, when have you ever explained anything at all?

You would need to understand something to explain it.

Isn't it funny how us so-called deniers are the ones that can explain things in our own words?

Isn't it funny how the AGW cultists can only refer to scripture?
 
Isn't it funny how us so-called deniers are the ones that can explain things in our own words?

Isn't it funny how the AGW cultists can only refer to scripture?

I’m waiting for Jack.

Funny that 20 posts later, there’s no explanation, isn’t it?
 
I’m waiting for Jack.

Funny that 20 posts later, there’s no explanation, isn’t it?

I lost track of the topic, but last time I was paying attention to the bantering between the two of you, he explained it quite well. You just failed to comprehend.
 
I lost track of the topic, but last time I was paying attention to the bantering between the two of you, he explained it quite well. You just failed to comprehend.

I’m sure you can easily find that (nonexistent) post.
 
Isn't it funny how us so-called deniers are the ones that can explain things in our own words?

Isn't it funny how the AGW cultists can only refer to scripture?


You know when you are dealing with a cult when they cannot answer your questions.
 


You know when you are dealing with a cult when they cannot answer your questions.

You mean like when I ask Jack to explain his link?

Or when we ask LOP to explain why Cook is misrepresenting trials?

I think this may be the first accurate post of yours, ever.
 
You mean like when I ask Jack to explain his link?

Or when we ask LOP to explain why Cook is misrepresenting trials?

I think this may be the first accurate post of yours, ever.

Too bad we have gone over this before. I'm not going to take the 30 minutes it takes to find the paper again, and other papers, end explain again to you and others that will simply deny the facts.,

I have a life.

Cooks paper came out over 7 years ago. We discussed it then.

Are you senile?
 
Too bad we have gone over this before. I'm not going to take the 30 minutes it takes to find the paper again, and other papers, end explain again to you and others that will simply deny the facts.,

I have a life.

Cooks paper came out over 7 years ago. We discussed it then.

Are you senile?

Really?

You ‘know’ he’s misrepresented it, but you can’t remember how?

And it takes you a half hour to look up a paper?
 
Really?

You ‘know’ he’s misrepresented it, but you can’t remember how?

And it takes you a half hour to look up a paper?

He lies about what the results of the other papers actually mean.
 
The data, from NASA, says that the only significant impact of increased CO2 so far is; ]



You know when you are dealing with a cult when they cannot answer your questions.


HAHAHAHAHA
 
What was your question?

You did not manage to ask one.

That is because you would never understand the answer.

You can not see the question in my post? Do you at least see the question mark?



HAHAHAHAHAHA



My god you are priceless
 
He lies about what the results of the other papers actually mean.

Yeah. That’s what ‘misrepresent’ means.

You keep saying it with no actual specifics...if you’re too damn ‘busy’ to remember, you sure aren’t too busy to keep vomiting up the same pablum.
 
Back
Top Bottom