• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

US is hotbed of climate change denial, major global survey finds

LOL an greenie blog.

German consumers still pay the highest electrical bills in the EU.

Germany’s green energy shift is more fizzle than sizzle – POLITICO

Your link stated the following:

Renewable power last year surged to 36 percent of the country's electricity use, according to the Agora Energiewende think tank. But while renewables grew in the power sector, they didn't make major strides in transport or heating, so they account for just over 13 percent of energy use.

There is no question that the entire world needs to work on transport and heating. Those two areas are being neglected everywhere, not just Germany. What are you doing to reduce your footprint? I'm in a fairly cold climate area (Colorado Front Range), and I get over 99% of my heating from passive solar and thermal mass.

Mass transit, bicycles, and electric cars powered by renewables are all effective for reducing transportation emissions. Which are you doing?
 
Your link stated the following:

Renewable power last year surged to 36 percent of the country's electricity use, according to the Agora Energiewende think tank. But while renewables grew in the power sector, they didn't make major strides in transport or heating, so they account for just over 13 percent of energy use.

There is no question that the entire world needs to work on transport and heating. Those two areas are being neglected everywhere, not just Germany. What are you doing to reduce your footprint? I'm in a fairly cold climate area (Colorado Front Range), and I get over 99% of my heating from passive solar and thermal mass.

Mass transit, bicycles, and electric cars powered by renewables are all effective for reducing transportation emissions. Which are you doing?

Since there is no proof that man is to blame for the very slight rise in temp, absolutely nothing. I have a RAV4 which I enjoy driving and plan to get another gas guzzling SUV when I build my retirement home on my beach property as soon as I get more money. :mrgreen:
 
[FONT=&quot]Climate News[/FONT]
[h=1]Climate issue rejected – Historic win in Australia after Labor loses ‘unlosable’ election[/h][FONT=&quot]Given the rejection, this may be the last Australian election where “climate” is used as a key issue. From CNN: Australia’s Liberal National coalition government under Prime Minister Scott Morrison has won a historic victory, taking his party for a third term in government against all expectations.It is still unknown if Morrison will form a…
[/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Aussie Election Lesson: Climate Activism is a Game for Lazy Rich Elitists[/h][FONT=&quot]Guest essay by Eric Worrall One of the most intriguing takeaways from the 18th May Federal Election in Australia is how poorly Labor’s climate action political campaign focus played in working class areas. Scott Morrison has earnt a permanent place as a Liberal Party legend — returning the Government in what was meant to be…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
image-placeholder-title.jpg


The Great Smog of 1952 - HISTORY

For five days in December 1952, the Great Smog of London smothered the city, wreaking havoc and killing thousands.

Fog, combined with smoke to produce smog, was nothing new in London, but this particular “pea souper” quickly thickened into a poisonous stew unlike anything the city had ever experienced.

A high-pressure weather system had stalled over southern England and caused a temperature inversion, in which a layer of warm air high above the surface trapped the stagnant, cold air at ground level.

The temperature inversion prevented London’s sulfurous coal smoke from rising, and with nary a breeze to be found, there was no wind to disperse the soot-laden smog. The noxious, 30-mile-wide air mass, teeming with acrid sulfur particles, reeked like rotten eggs—and it was getting worse every day.

The Great Smog of 1952 was much more than a nuisance. It was lethal, particularly for the elderly, young children and those with respiratory problems. Heavy smokers were especially vulnerable because of their already-impaired lungs, and smoking was common at the time, especially among men.

It wasn’t until undertakers began to run out of coffins and florists out of bouquets that the deadly impact of the Great Smog was realized. Deaths from bronchitis and pneumonia increased more than sevenfold. The death rate in London’s East End increased ninefold.

Initial reports estimated that about 4,000 died prematurely in the immediate aftermath of the smog.

The detrimental effects lingered, however, and death rates remained well above normal into the summer of 1953. Many experts now estimate the Great Smog claimed at least 8,000 lives, and perhaps as many as 12,000.

The effects of the Big Smoke weren’t limited to people: Birds lost in the fog crashed into buildings. Eleven prize heifers brought to Earls Court for the famed Smithfield Show choked to death, and breeders fashioned improvised gas masks for their cattle by soaking grain sacks in whiskey.

After five days of living in a sulfurous hell, the Great Smog finally lifted on December 9, when a brisk wind from the west swept the toxic cloud away from London and out to the North Sea.

Following a government investigation, however, Parliament passed the Clean Air Act of 1956, which restricted the burning of coal in urban areas and authorized local councils to set up smoke-free zones. Homeowners received grants to convert from coal to alternative heating systems.

The transition away from coal as the city’s primary heating source toward gas, oil and electricity took years, and during that time deadly fogs periodically occurred, such as one that killed about 750 people in 1962. None of them, however, approached the scale of the 1952 Great Smog.
 
Since there is no proof that man is to blame for the very slight rise in temp, absolutely nothing. I have a RAV4 which I enjoy driving and plan to get another gas guzzling SUV when I build my retirement home on my beach property as soon as I get more money. :mrgreen:

When we're long gone from this earth, your grandchildren will talk about how their grandpa was bull-headed, and ignored the science.

What an ironic twist it will be when that Climate Change hurricane destroys your retirement home on your beach property.
 
When we're long gone from this earth, your grandchildren will talk about how their grandpa was bull-headed, and ignored the science.

They're going to say grandpa was a great man because he didnt fall for the environmental scam that hooked a lot of gullible people, and they'll be enjoying my legacy beside the beach, in front of the old house I built for them. :mrgreen:
 
The writing is on the wall. The golden years of the United States are over. We have lost our progressive edge and our leadership role in the eyes of most of the world. Our domestic infrastructure is crumbling, our population is stressed out and unhealthy, our corporate capitalist culture has seized power, and our partisan politics have torn our once great nation to shreds, We will always be a great nation for research and development, but we are no longer considered reliable for uncorrupt policy making. The world is moving on without us.
 
Meanwhile, sensible people are worried. You guys trust Bloomberg, right?:

“I am really insecure on the security of supply,” Tobias Federico, managing director of consultant Energy Brainpool, which has advised the German government and RWE AG, said at a Montel conference in Dusseldorf. “Specially for 2022 it is an issue. I am concerned about the winter of that year. It takes five years to build a power plant and we don’t have that time anymore.”

Europe's Biggest Economy Is Worrying About Blackouts

Renewables was 40 percent of Germany’s electricity generation in 2018.

Renewables Generated a Record 65 Percent of Germany’s Electricity Last Week - Yale E360

There you also have Denmark that got 68 percent of their electricity consumption from renewables in 2018.

As Wind Turned Down A Notch, Solar Soared -- 2018 Renewable Energy Report Denmark | CleanTechnica

There neither countries had problems with blackout. Instead you only have a link there people that says that it might be a risk for blackout in a couple of years.

It can then be good to remember the rapid advancement in renewable energy and batteries that time after time have beaten expectations. That renewables in combination with batteries are already getting more and more competitive in producing electricity on demand.

“In fact, the LCOE for multi-hour lithium-ion batteries is falling to the point that batteries co-located with solar or wind projects are starting to compete, in many markets and without subsidy, with coal- and gas-fired generation for the provision of ‘dispatchable power’ that can be delivered whenever the grid needs it (as opposed to only when the wind is blowing, or the sun is shining),” the report notes.”

Report: Levelized Cost of Energy for Lithium-Ion Batteries Is Plummeting | Greentech Media

There you for example have the very successful giant battery in Australia from Tesla.

Tesla big battery turns one, celebrates $50 million in grid savings | RenewEconomy
 
Your link stated the following:

Renewable power last year surged to 36 percent of the country's electricity use, according to the Agora Energiewende think tank. But while renewables grew in the power sector, they didn't make major strides in transport or heating, so they account for just over 13 percent of energy use.

There is no question that the entire world needs to work on transport and heating. Those two areas are being neglected everywhere, not just Germany. What are you doing to reduce your footprint? I'm in a fairly cold climate area (Colorado Front Range), and I get over 99% of my heating from passive solar and thermal mass.

Mass transit, bicycles, and electric cars powered by renewables are all effective for reducing transportation emissions. Which are you doing?

Also his link also say that Germany are on target to reduce it's C02 with 30 percent since 1990. There they done it while at the same time having a very strong econony. There the reason there didn't have even biggger reduction to 40 percent or more was as you write that they have lacked in areas like transport and heating. While at the same as you show there are positive example that show that there are potential to reduce the pollution from heatingn. Another positive example is that Swedish replaced oil fired burner with district heating.

District heating

While then it comes to transport you have Norway there 1 out of 3 vehicles zero-emission vehicle in 2018. While 49 percent of vehicle there either hybrids or zeo-emissions.

Electric car sales grew by 40% in Norway this year - Electrek

Another reason for that Germany will not reach there target is that had an ambitius goal of both transition away from fossil fuel and at the same close their nuclear plants.
 
They're going to say grandpa was a great man because he didnt fall for the environmental scam that hooked a lot of gullible people, and they'll be enjoying my legacy beside the beach, in front of the old house I built for them. :mrgreen:

You'll probably build a typical stick home, with poor insulation; instead of the latest ZERO-ENERGY homes, which are more comfortable, healthier, and better for the world. Your grandchildren's neighbors, who elect to build this type of home, will laugh at your grandchildren all the way to the bank.
 
Also his link also say that Germany are on target to reduce it's C02 with 30 percent since 1990. There they done it while at the same time having a very strong econony. There the reason there didn't have even biggger reduction to 40 percent or more was as you write that they have lacked in areas like transport and heating. While at the same as you show there are positive example that show that there are potential to reduce the pollution from heatingn. Another positive example is that Swedish replaced oil fired burner with district heating.

District heating

While then it comes to transport you have Norway there 1 out of 3 vehicles zero-emission vehicle in 2018. While 49 percent of vehicle there either hybrids or zeo-emissions.

Electric car sales grew by 40% in Norway this year - Electrek

Another reason for that Germany will not reach there target is that had an ambitius goal of both transition away from fossil fuel and at the same close their nuclear plants.

Yes, a few of the Northern European countries are making some headway into vehicular and home-heating initiatives - Norway, Sweden, Denmark, etc... That said, there is much more to do on this front.
 
The writing is on the wall. The golden years of the United States are over. We have lost our progressive edge and our leadership role in the eyes of most of the world. Our domestic infrastructure is crumbling, our population is stressed out and unhealthy, our corporate capitalist culture has seized power, and our partisan politics have torn our once great nation to shreds, We will always be a great nation for research and development, but we are no longer considered reliable for uncorrupt policy making. The world is moving on without us.

It certainly seems that way. I'm a little more optimistic. I think our personal choices can direct corporations. Case-in-point is Goldman Sachs, who has invested billions into wind energy. The consumer spoke, and the industrial giant listened. Also, look at the numbers for Residential Renewable Energy - many US citizens are letting their choices make a huge impact:

• U.S. net metering customers by technology 2017 | Statistic

Numbers_Netmetering.JPG

These are 2017 numbers. There are probably closer to 3 million people who have installed PV systems in the US!!!
 
[h=2]Australia Election Results Show Citizens Fed Up With Infantile “Vote For Us, Or Die!” Campaigns And Threats[/h]By P Gosselin on 19. May 2019
Australia’s election results are in, and once again major media are in state of shock.
[h=3]Hysteria and insults get refuted[/h]The New York Times here for example called it a “stunning win” and claimed it was “propelled by a populist wave” that resembled “the force that has upended politics in the United States, Britain and beyond.”
The UK Guardian went on, calling the result of the “climate change election” a “major upset”, complaining that in fact “the climate lost.”
The climate skeptic, German-language Ruhrkultour here commented that citizens have grown increasingly tired of the “climate hysteria”, and that this ultimately “cost Labour the election victory”.
Now that the dust begins to settle, the search for answers begins in earnest. But as was the case in 2016 in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s stunning victory, don’t expect the losing side to acknowledge the truth and reality. That’s all just a bit too tough for them.
Rather look for them to search out a scapegoat. Expect them to even start criticizing democracy and blaming “misled voters”, who were deceived by fake news and populist disinformation campaigns. There will be more loud calls for even greater crackdowns on Internet social media platforms. . . .
 
Yes, a few of the Northern European countries are making some headway into vehicular and home-heating initiatives - Norway, Sweden, Denmark, etc... That said, there is much more to do on this front.

Then it comes to district heating its a well tested and decade old technology. The drawback is that it have big iniatial investments while those pay off over time. So the problem is short sightness by both private and public entities in other countries. While it seem that you have district heating in some parts of the US.

District heating - Wikipedia
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Alberta Introduces Carbon Tax Repeal Bill[/h][FONT=&quot]From OILPRICE By Irina Slav – May 23, 2019, 9:30 AM CDT Staying true to their promise from the campaign trail, Alberta’s Conservatives have introduced a bill to repeal a carbon tax introduced by their predecessors at the helm of the province, the New Democratic Party. Reuters reports that the repealment of the carbon tax…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
[FONT="][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/05/24/alberta-introduces-carbon-tax-repeal-bill/"]
bb377ed3b602a83bdc3c0fa02f1d18a0-460x260.jpg
[/URL][/FONT]

[h=1]Alberta Introduces Carbon Tax Repeal Bill[/h][FONT="][FONT=inherit]From OILPRICE By Irina Slav – May 23, 2019, 9:30 AM CDT Staying true to their promise from the campaign trail, Alberta’s Conservatives have introduced a bill to repeal a carbon tax introduced by their predecessors at the helm of the province, the New Democratic Party. Reuters reports that the repealment of the carbon tax…[/FONT]
[FONT=inherit][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/05/24/alberta-introduces-carbon-tax-repeal-bill/"]Continue reading →[/URL][/FONT]
[/FONT]

Canada carbon tax will be a net benefit from households.

Canada passed a carbon tax that will give most Canadians more money | Dana Nuccitelli | Environment | The Guardian

Also Canada's C02 emissions are just like US's two three times bigger than many other developed countries so Canada just like US have greater opportunities to reduce their C02 emissions.

List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita - Wikipedia
 
Canada carbon tax will be a net benefit from households.

Canada passed a carbon tax that will give most Canadians more money | Dana Nuccitelli | Environment | The Guardian

Also Canada's C02 emissions are just like US's two three times bigger than many other developed countries so Canada just like US have greater opportunities to reduce their C02 emissions.

List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita - Wikipedia

Like the US, Canada needs to work on it's efficient home-building. We could be building homes that require little or no energy for heating and cooling. I built one. It really isn't that difficult, and it's not much more expensive.
 
US is in top then it comes to climate denialism in a new study conducted by YouGov-Cambridge Globalism Project. While a great mayority of Americans acknowledge manmade global warming.

"The US is a hotbed of climate science denial when compared with other countries, with international polling finding a significant number of Americans do not believe human-driven climate change is occurring.

A total of 13% of Americans polled in a 23-country survey conducted by the YouGov-Cambridge Globalism Project agreed with the statement that the climate is changing “but human activity is not responsible at all”. A further 5% said the climate was not changing.

Only Saudi Arabia (16%) and Indonesia (18%) had a higher proportion of people doubtful of manmade climate change."

US is hotbed of climate change denial, major global survey finds | Environment | The Guardian

While at the same time there are hope that climate change can become a bipartisan issue in the future. For example that Republican politicians are on a local level starting to acknowledge the great benefits of renewable energy.

Why Republican Leaders Love Renewable Energy


While at the same time the evidence of manmade global warming is so overwhelmning that even federal agencies under Donald Trump acknowledge the urgent need for action on climate change.

Fourth National Climate Assessment

So your title is claiming that most of the informed intelligent people with common sense live in the US. Good to know.
 
So your title is claiming that most of the informed intelligent people with common sense live in the US. Good to know.

Is common-sense the practice of listening to the rhetoric of the Heartland Institute and the Koch Brothers?
 
Like the US, Canada needs to work on it's efficient home-building. We could be building homes that require little or no energy for heating and cooling. I built one. It really isn't that difficult, and it's not much more expensive.

While Sweden have been good at distric heating and also reduce the need for heating.

District heating

Swedish city builds 'passive houses' as part of ambitious CO2 reduction targets | Guardian Sustainable Business | The Guardian

While Sweden are now getting more heat waves that also getting more extreme. So Sweden may need to learn from US and other counries then it comes to building houses that also good at cooling. That a lot of people in Sweden bought air conditioners during last year heat wave, something you typicly wouldn't need in Sweden.

Climate change made Europe’s heatwave twice as likely to happen | New Scientist
 
While Sweden have been good at distric heating and also reduce the need for heating.

District heating

Swedish city builds 'passive houses' as part of ambitious CO2 reduction targets | Guardian Sustainable Business | The Guardian

While Sweden are now getting more heat waves that also getting more extreme. So Sweden may need to learn from US and other counries then it comes to building houses that also good at cooling. That a lot of people in Sweden bought air conditioners during last year heat wave, something you typicly wouldn't need in Sweden.

Climate change made Europe’s heatwave twice as likely to happen | New Scientist

Yes, I'm sure cities in northern latitudes will get warmer as the natural land is capped off. You have asphalt and concrete holding heat, and a dramatic loss of evaporation cooling.

The science is clear. Warming will occur with such land use changes.
 
While Sweden have been good at distric heating and also reduce the need for heating.

District heating

Swedish city builds 'passive houses' as part of ambitious CO2 reduction targets | Guardian Sustainable Business | The Guardian

While Sweden are now getting more heat waves that also getting more extreme. So Sweden may need to learn from US and other counries then it comes to building houses that also good at cooling. That a lot of people in Sweden bought air conditioners during last year heat wave, something you typicly wouldn't need in Sweden.

Climate change made Europe’s heatwave twice as likely to happen | New Scientist

That "Europe Heatwave Link" made a pretty bold statement, but it seems to back it up with the study.

“We estimate that the probability to have such a heat or higher is generally more than two times higher today than if human activities had not altered climate,” the team reports.
 
That "Europe Heatwave Link" made a pretty bold statement, but it seems to back it up with the study.

“We estimate that the probability to have such a heat or higher is generally more than two times higher today than if human activities had not altered climate,” the team reports.

Weather elements are now getting more and more extreme thereby also making them easier to link to climate change.
 
Yes, I'm sure cities in northern latitudes will get warmer as the natural land is capped off. You have asphalt and concrete holding heat, and a dramatic loss of evaporation cooling.

The science is clear. Warming will occur with such land use changes.

Most of northern Sweden and Finland are desolate forest and mountains and also had extreme heat waves, so your unsubstantiated excuse for the warming doesn't work.
 
Back
Top Bottom