• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tim Ryan, D- Ohio, Says world will warm 7 degrees celsius on Maria Bartiromo's show.

code1211

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
47,695
Reaction score
10,467
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought
 
I'm sure a video of the interview will be released later today and I'll be sure to watch it.

I like Bartiromo. She is the quintessential "suspicious cat".

maria-bartiromo-suspicious-cat-ratcliffe.jpg
 
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?
 
My temperature rises when she's on.She's hot.
 
Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?

The article I linked to said that the Global Climate COULD rise by about half the amount cited by Ryan over the next 81 years.

Ryan said it will rise by that amount in the next 70 years.

Do you have a source he may have been relying upon to support his assertion?

I couldn't find one.
 
The article I linked to said that the Global Climate COULD rise by about half the amount cited by Ryan over the next 81 years.

Ryan said it will rise by that amount in the next 70 years.

Do you have a source he may have been relying upon to support his assertion?

I couldn't find one.

Sounds like you have some exciting research that falsifies the study! So let's see it. Now.
 
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?


This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

Buhttps://e360.yale.edu/digest/trump-administration-estimates-planet-will-warm-7-degrees-fahrenheit-by-2100t this was likely what he was talking about and does not understand temperature designations.



See Donald Trump for the answer.
Trump Administration Estimates Planet Will Warm 7 Degrees Fahrenheit by 2100 - Yale E360
 
Last edited:
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

He's a politician, not a scientist. I think he meant 7 degrees Farenheit. That is a figure within the high end realm of reality. It is also a figure calamitous for humans. Species extinction is ongoing at exponential rates and if insects go extinct, so will we. In the meantime, sell that beachfront property.
/
 
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

They never seem to tell us what the want the climate to do. Just stop changing! Uhhh... OK...
 
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

Take the high end (worst case?) celsius climate change scientific guesstimate and then convert it to Fahrenheit (rounding up, as required). Poof - you have the predicted scientific evidence of a total planetary disaster. Next, you proclaim that makes it necessary to have a one world (or at least one party) government.
 
Buhttps://e360.yale.edu/digest/trump-administration-estimates-planet-will-warm-7-degrees-fahrenheit-by-2100t this was likely what he was talking about and does not understand temperature designations.



See Donald Trump for the answer.
Trump Administration Estimates Planet Will Warm 7 Degrees Fahrenheit by 2100 - Yale E360

That presents a whole new level of stupid in our Congress.

Not that any American can handle the metric system, but most at least have the wisdom to avoid it all together.
 
Sounds like you have some exciting research that falsifies the study! So let's see it. Now.

Do you have a working understanding of the English language?
 
Do you have a working understanding of the English language?
:lamo

Already with the personal insults I see. Wasn't expect you to telegraph that hard that you were just attempting a drive-by post, but okay then!
 
He's a politician, not a scientist. I think he meant 7 degrees Farenheit. That is a figure within the high end realm of reality. It is also a figure calamitous for humans. Species extinction is ongoing at exponential rates and if insects go extinct, so will we. In the meantime, sell that beachfront property.
/

The article had all kinds of mush and slush around it's conjecture:

"According to the study, published in Nature, researchers in Australia found that by 2100, the planet could see an increase in global temperatures of more than 3 degrees Celsius, or 5.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and could even exceed 4 degrees Celsius, or 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit. By 2200, that number could double to 8 degrees Celsius."

As always in these things, the premise is stated and then the dire predictions are layeered on thick.

Why a Congressman is duped into repeating and exaggerating it further is really a wonder of outlandish gullibility.

I wonder how many bridges in New York he thinks he owns...
 
:lamo

Already with the personal insults I see. Wasn't expect you to telegraph that hard that you were just attempting a drive-by post, but okay then!

Your post indicated either that you did not read my post or did not understand it.
 
Your post indicated either that you did not read my post or did not understand it.
:lamo

Let's try this again, shall we? Since you clearly do not accept the scientific opinion on climate change, what research have you published that falsifies it? Simple question.
 
That presents a whole new level of stupid in our Congress.

Not that any American can handle the metric system, but most at least have the wisdom to avoid it all together.

Yeah....rather ignorant, but not when considered in the light of our President.
 
Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?

What didn't he "accept"? The Nature study showed a possible increase of 3 or 4 degrees Celsius over the "70-year" span, not 7.

According to the study, published in Nature, researchers in Australia found that by 2100, the planet could see an increase in global temperatures of more than 3 degrees Celsius, or 5.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and could even exceed 4 degrees Celsius, or 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit. By 2200, that number could double to 8 degrees Celsius.

What did code say?

I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

So it looks to me that he did, in fact, accept it.
 
What didn't he "accept"? The Nature study showed a possible increase of 3 or 4 degrees Celsius over the "70-year" span, not 7.

What did code say?

So it looks to me that he did, in fact, accept it.

Hello, Harshaw. Do you accept the scientific opinion on climate change or not?
 
Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?

The study says 7 degrees Fahrenheit, the Congressman said 7 degrees Celsius.
 
The study says 7 degrees Fahrenheit, the Congressman said 7 degrees Celsius.

Yes, it's only going to be about a 4C increase, which by all measures would put us into dangerous territory!

this-is-fine.0.jpg
 
Hello, Harshaw. Do you accept the scientific opinion on climate change or not?

This question is irrelevant to anything I said.

Therefore, I will note the deflection and repost my question:

Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?

What didn't he "accept"? The Nature study showed a possible increase of 3 or 4 degrees Celsius over the "70-year" span, not 7.

According to the study, published in Nature, researchers in Australia found that by 2100, the planet could see an increase in global temperatures of more than 3 degrees Celsius, or 5.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and could even exceed 4 degrees Celsius, or 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit. By 2200, that number could double to 8 degrees Celsius.

What did code say?

I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

So it looks to me that he did, in fact, accept it.

Do you have a good-faith, honest answer to this question? If so, please state it.
 
This question is irrelevant to anything I said.

A question regarding acceptance of climate science in a discussion about climate science doesn't matter? Oh, and I thought my jokes were bad! :lol:

Now let's try the question that really matters again. Do you, Harshaw, accept the scientific opinion on climate change? Yes or no. Simple question. Yes or no.
 
A question regarding acceptance of climate science in a discussion about climate science doesn't matter? Oh, and I thought my jokes were bad! :lol:

No, acceptance of the Nature study, something you said he didn't do.

Obviously, you're going to continue dodging the question, so that in itself is answer enough. You misread either his post, the article, or both, and you thought that the study supported the idea of a 7-degree Celsius rise, when it did not, and you thought you had a "gotcha!" on code, when you didn't.

Which you now, of course, are transparently trying to deflect to anything you can in order to avoid admitting it.

I tried to have a good-faith exchange with you. I regret that you were not interested in that.

Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
 
A question regarding acceptance of climate science in a discussion about climate science doesn't matter? Oh, and I thought my jokes were bad! :lol:

Now let's try the question that really matters again. Do you, Harshaw, accept the scientific opinion on climate change? Yes or no. Simple question. Yes or no.

Why, you're having your very own Shiela Jackson Lee moment. How cute.
 
Back
Top Bottom