• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Perspectives on Temperature

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]El Niño and it’s contribution to 21st Century Warming – interview with Dr. Roy Spencer.[/h][FONT=&quot]Politicians, politicized scientists and activists will have you believe that 100% of 21st century warming is anthropogenic. Dr. Roy Spencer joins Anthony Watts in a podcast interview to explain why they’re wrong. When ranking politicized issues in the 21st century, global warming is surely near the top. Radical environmentalists like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez want to drastically reshape…
[/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot]Weather[/FONT]
[h=1]Unusual Cool Temperatures over the Pacific Northwest Leads to Strong Winds and Power Outages in California[/h][FONT=&quot]Reposted from the Cliff Mass Weather Blog Saturday brought record or near-record cold temperatures to the Pacific Northwest, and strangely enough, that led to unusual Diablo winds over northern California, with the regional utility PG&E cutting power to thousands to reduce the chance of another major wildfire. Cold temperatures potentially producing wildfires? Ironic, perhaps, but…
[/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]A Second Look At Radiation Versus Temperature[/h][FONT=&quot]Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach I kept going back and looking at the graphic from my previous post on radiation and temperature. It kept niggling at me. It shows the change in surface temperature compared to the contemporaneous change in how much energy the surface is absorbing. Here’s that graphic again: What I found botheracious…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
[h=2]Adjusted “Unadjusted” Data: NASA Uses The “Magic Wand Of Fudging”, Produces Warming Where There Never Was[/h]By P Gosselin on 25. June 2019
By Kirye
and Pierre Gosselin
It’s been long known that NASA GISS has been going through its historical temperature data archives and erasing old temperature measurements and replacing them with new, made up figures without any real legitimate reason.
This practice has led to the formation of new datasets called “adjusted” data, with the old datasets being called “V3 unadjusted”. The problem for global warming activists, however, was that when anyone looks at the old “V3 unadjusted” – i.e. untampered data – they often found a downward linear temperature trend. Such negative trends of course are an embarrassment for global warming alarmists, who have been claiming the planet is warming up rapidly.
The adjusted “unadjusted” data
So what to do? Well, it seems that NASA has decided to adjust its “V3 unadjusted datasets” and rename them as “V4 unadjusted”. That’s right, the adjusted data has become the new V4 “unadjusted” data.
And what kind of trend does the new “V4 unadjusted” data show?
You guessed it. The new V4 unadjusted data are now yielding warmed up trends, even at places where a cooling trend once existed.
This is how NASA uses its magic wand of fudging to turn past cooling into (fake) warming.
6 examples of scandalous mischief by NASA
What follows are 6 examples, scattered across the globe and going back decades, which demonstrate this scandalous mischief taking place at NASA.
No. 1
Punta Arenas, Chile. Here we see how a clear cooling trend has been warmed up by NASA to produce a slight cooling trend:
 
[h=2]The GAT in the Hat[/h]June 26, 2019 By jennifer 4 Comments
[FONT=&quot]The hopeless pursuit of a “Global Average Temperature” mirage makes mischief in meteorology. There is a better way. By Mark Huxley Akin "I AM not a scientist, but a lay person who was lucky enough to grow up with a scientist father who taught … [Read more...]
[/FONT]
 
Jack Hays said:
[h=2]The GAT in the Hat[/h]June 26, 2019 By jennifer 4 Comments
[FONT="][URL="https://jennifermarohasy.com/2019/06/the-gat-in-the-hat/"]
Bourke_light-cropped-150x150.jpg
[/URL]The hopeless pursuit of a “Global Average Temperature” mirage makes mischief in meteorology. There is a better way. By Mark Huxley Akin "I AM not a scientist, but a lay person who was lucky enough to grow up with a scientist father who taught … [Read more...]
[/FONT]
Click to expand...

"I am not a scientist" is where I stopped reading.
 
Jack Hays said:
[h=2]UAH Global Temperature Update for June, 2019: +0.47 deg. C[/h]July 2nd, 2019The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for June, 2019 was +0.47 deg. C, up from the May, 2019 value of +0.32 deg. C:
The linear warming trend since January, 1979 remains at +0.13 C/decade.
Click to expand...

You continue to post this nonsense. The UAH satellite temperature records are riddled with errors. The RSS satellites corrected this in 1998. Just shows how biased the folks at UAH are, as their records have been refuted by one scientific group after another, and yet they refuse to correct the record.

Major correction to satellite data shows 140% faster warming since 1998

A new paper published in the Journal of Climate reveals that the lower part of the Earth’s atmosphere has warmed much faster since 1979 than scientists relying on satellite data had previously thought.

More accurate are land-based temperature averages --->

Temp_Anomaly_NASA_2019.JPG

I would suggest throwing your graph in the electronic cylindrical garbage can.
 
Media_Truth said:
You continue to post this nonsense. The UAH satellite temperature records are riddled with errors. The RSS satellites corrected this in 1998. Just shows how biased the folks at UAH are, as their records have been refuted by one scientific group after another, and yet they refuse to correct the record.

Major correction to satellite data shows 140% faster warming since 1998

A new paper published in the Journal of Climate reveals that the lower part of the Earth’s atmosphere has warmed much faster since 1979 than scientists relying on satellite data had previously thought.

More accurate are land-based temperature averages --->

View attachment 67259327

I would suggest throwing your graph in the electronic cylindrical garbage can.
Click to expand...

And you continue to post propaganda.
 
For folks who climate change is happening to now, we don't need graphs, we need people who are willing to accept what is clear to almost everyone. Weatherwise, things are getting more severe everywhere. Ask the people of miami where certain streets flood under a high tide. Or californians about wildfires or floridians or east coasters about hurricanes.

Nah, no climate change.
 
Jack Hays said:
Nope. That was just another attempt to fiddle the data.
Click to expand...

:roll:

Stunning rebuttal. Feel free to show us the math you did that proves their methodology inaccurate.
 
Deuce said:
:roll:

Stunning rebuttal. Feel free to show us the math you did that proves their methodology inaccurate.
Click to expand...

There has been a cottage industry of attacks on UAH, and yet their track is neither the coolest nor the warmest.
 
Jack Hays said:
There has been a cottage industry of attacks on UAH, and yet their track is neither the coolest nor the warmest.
Click to expand...

I'm really not sure what you think this post is evidence in support of.
 
Deuce said:
I'm really not sure what you think this post is evidence in support of.
Click to expand...

[FONT=&quot]A breakdown of several climate datasets, appearing below in degrees centigrade per decade, indicates there are significant discrepancies in estimated climate trends:[/FONT]

  • AIRS: +0.24 (from the 2019 Susskind et al. study)
  • GISTEMP: +0.22
  • ECMWF: +0.20
  • RSS LT: +0.20
  • Cowtan & Way: +0.19
  • UAH LT: +0.18
  • HadCRUT4: +0.17

Does NASA’s Latest Study Confirm Global Warming?
 
The deniers deny the obvious. Its what right wing media tells them to believe. Nothing will change because the rich are getting richer while MMGW continues.

Only thing you can do as an individual is prepare. I highly recommend it! Our civilized society is quite fragile.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom