• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Perspectives on Temperature

Jack Hays said:
[FONT="][h=1]Blog[/h][/FONT][/COLOR]
[h=2][URL="https://jennifermarohasy.com/2019/02/met-bureau-rewrites-history-again-at-albany/"]Bureau Rewrites History – Again, at Albany[/URL][/h]February 16, 2019 By jennifer 15 Comments
THE Australian Bureau of Meteorology keeps remodelling the temperature record for Australia – and not just by a little bit. Temperatures are changed through a process known as homogenisation, and then changed again, sometimes by as much as 6.4 … [Read more...]about Bureau Rewrites History – Again, at Albany

Filed Under: InformationTagged With: Temperatures
Click to expand...


I remember some time back, I pointed out revisions here in Portland Oregon. The usual deniers of science denied the facts then, they will deny or rationalize these somehow.
 
[h=2]Canadian Prairie Soybean Increase Not Due to Global Warming[/h]February 22nd, 2019There is no shortage of articles claiming that global warming is causing agriculture of certain crops to push farther north, for example into the southern Canadian Prairie provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
My contacts in the grain trading business tell me that the belief is widespread.
For example, here’s a quote from a Manitoba Co-operator article,
Lutz Goedde, of the management and consulting firm McKinsey & Company, said Canada is in a unique position because of its northern latitude and large supply of fresh water…. Pointing to the steady northward trek of corn and soybeans, the agricultural business consultant said that the effects are already evident.
The problem with this view is that the two main weather stations located in this region (Regina and Winnipeg) do not show a statistically significant warming trend during the prime growing months of June, July, and August: . . . .
 
[h=2]Adjusted! Another degree shaved off Darwins history — (it’s cooling so fast, in 50 years Darwin won’t even be tropical)[/h]
Graham Lloyd and Jen Marohasy scorch through the BoMs latest revision of Darwin.
On the 1st of January 1910 the maximum temperature recorded at the Darwin post office was 34.2 degrees C, then it became 33.8 C, and now it was, is, 32.8 C. (What’s the past tense of something that is now, but wasn’t then? We don’t even have grammar for this.)
Extrapolate that adjustment trend: One degree of cooling in 6 years (since the last adjustment) becomes 16 degrees cooler in a century. Darwin won’t know what hot days were!
[h=3]Look what they’ve done to history Mum[/h]The Bureau of Meteorology has no interest in the hot pre-1910 era which just gets chopped. And even if they did include it, after they’ve adjusted it — it wouldn’t be hot anymore anyway. Remember the Federation Drought? No one else does either.
Temperature is whatever you want to make it.
Mean maximum annual temperatures as measured at the Darwin Post Office and airport shown with the new remodeled ACORN-SAT Version 2, which is the new official record for Australia.
​
“What the Bureau has done to the historical temperature record for Darwin is indefensible. ” -- Marohasy . . . .

 
[FONT=&quot]Citizen science / USCRN[/FONT]
[h=1]How to make use of the world’s most accurate surface temperature data[/h][FONT=&quot]Steve, in Seattle writes: I began this project out of both frustration and a specific curiosity. I have, over the years, studied many excellent articles at WUWT. The articles that are mathematical / graphic “ heavy “ are of particular interest to me. While I appreciate that many authors have statistical and / or graphical…
[/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]The ‘trick’: How More Cooling Generates Global Warming[/h][FONT=&quot]From the “we’ll fix that in post” department comes this from down under courtesy of Dr. Jennifer Marohasy. COOLING the past relative to the present has the general effect of making the present appear hotter – it is a way of generating more global warming for the same weather. The Bureau of Meteorology has rewritten…
[/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Planet-Sized Experiments – we’ve already done the 2°C test[/h][FONT=&quot]Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach People often say that we’re heading into the unknown with regards to CO2 and the planet. They say we can’t know, for example, what a 2°C warming will do because we can’t do the experiment. This is seen as important because for unknown reasons, people have battened on to “2°C”…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
Google's Flagrant Alteration of the Past
Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian

[FONT=&quot]By far the most-read posts on this site are the ones in my now twenty-two part series The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time. The specific subject of that series is the alteration by government bureaucrats of historical temperature data in the ongoing campaign to convince the public that there is dangerous global warming going on. At this point, the showing that earlier-year temperatures have been materially altered downward (to create a fake enhanced warming trend) is completely definitive, demonstrated by simple comparison of currently-published official data to previously-published official data that can still be found online. Yet the bureaucrats at NOAA and NASA continue to disseminate the altered data, and even to make further ongoing “adjustments” to make the past appear to have been even cooler. And every time a NOAA or a NASA puts out a new breathless press release about the current year or month being the “hottest ever,” you can count on a dozen or more mainstream media sources to parrot the announcement without ever mentioning that the result derives entirely from fraudulently altered data. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The past has been changed. It’s official! Comparisons to the alteration of history by Stalin are completely appropriate. . . . .[/FONT]
 
To add to this on going discussion most of the AGW scientist claim that the "medieval warming period" was just a local event happening the the northern hemisphere. Then researchers in New Zealand and Australia have shown that this was a global event the AGW scientist do not acknowledge their finds. One can understand why, it doesn't fit their agenda and changes their data.
 
Terryj said:
To add to this on going discussion most of the AGW scientist claim that the "medieval warming period" was just a local event happening the the northern hemisphere. Then researchers in New Zealand and Australia have shown that this was a global event the AGW scientist do not acknowledge their finds. One can understand why, it doesn't fit their agenda and changes their data.
Click to expand...

They deny science when it doesn't agree with their dogma. They are like religious zealots.
 
Terryj said:
To add to this on going discussion most of the AGW scientist claim that the "medieval warming period" was just a local event happening the the northern hemisphere. Then researchers in New Zealand and Australia have shown that this was a global event the AGW scientist do not acknowledge their finds. One can understand why, it doesn't fit their agenda and changes their data.
Click to expand...

Did you read that on a pseudoscience conspiracy blog like WUWT? And you believed it without bothering to check if it was true?

It wasn't global, not at the same time. It wasn't even warm all over the North Atlantic at that time.

Numerous studies over the past two decades have shown this. You just won't find them on conspiracy blogs.
 
Last edited:
Lord of Planar said:
They deny science when it doesn't agree with their dogma. They are like religious zealots.
Click to expand...

No, that's you and your fellow climate truther science deniers.

For you, add in some ridiculous delusions of grandeur and a strong DK effect.
 
Last edited:
Quaestio said:
Did you read that on a pseudoscience conspiracy blog like WUWT? And you believed it without bothering to check if it was true?

It wasn't global, not at the same time. It wasn't even warm all over the North Atlantic at that time.

Numerous studies over the past two decades have shown this. You just won't find them on conspiracy blogs.
Click to expand...

The denial is strong in you.

[h=2]New Study: Medieval Warm Period Not Limited To North Atlantic, But Occurred In South America As Well[/h]By P Gosselin on 3. November 2018
Global warming alarmist scientists like claiming that the well documented Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was merely a regional phenomenon, and not global. However a new publication by Lüning et al adds yet another study that shows the warm period from 1000 years ago was indeed global. ================================ Image source: here. Preindustrial climate change in South […]

New Paleoclimate Findings Show Medieval Warm Period Across Africa And Arabia…Natural Climate Drivers
By P Gosselin on 10. February 2018
Paleoclimate data still spotty and incomplete, leaving climate models vague, uncalibrated and filled with uncertainty Paleo-climatological data, used for the reconstruction of past climate from proxy records such as ice cores, tree rings, sediment cores etc., have not had adequate geographical coverage. Lake Tanganyika, Tanzania, where a sediment core was extracted. Credit: Andreas31, CC BY-SA 3.0. For […]

New Study Confirms Medieval Warm Period Was Indeed Global, And As Warm As Today
By P Gosselin on 29. August 2017
Here’s another blow to the global warming alarmist scientists, who have been claiming that the Medieval Warm Period was a local, North Atlantic phenomenon, and did not really exist globally. What follows is a report on yet another paper contradicting this now worn out claim. =================================== China: Warm phase of the 20th century was not […]


Body Of Proof: Large Number Of Studies Show Medieval Warm Period “Prominent In Southern Hemisphere”
By P Gosselin on 31. May 2016
Remember how in the late 1990s/early 2000s the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was made to disappear, and it was claimed that it was mainly a local, North Atlantic phenomenon. Unfortunately for those trumpeting this claim, a comprehensive worldwide survey of scientific literature is now showing that the MWP was in fact a global phenomenon, suggesting large-scale natural […]



 
Quaestio said:
Did you read that on a pseudoscience conspiracy blog like WUWT? And you believed it without bothering to check if it was true?

It wasn't global, not at the same time. It wasn't even warm all over the North Atlantic at that time.

Numerous studies over the past two decades have shown this. You just won't find them on conspiracy blogs.
Click to expand...

Did you do any research on this subject before you posted your reply, or are you just parroting what others tell you.

Here is a link to their findings: CO2 Science
 
Terryj said:
Did you do any research on this subject before you posted your reply, or are you just parroting what others tell you.

Here is a link to their findings: CO2 Science
Click to expand...
Did you do any research on this subject before you posted your reply, or are you just parroting what others tell you?

You linked to a science denier blog by the Idso family. Well known fossil fuel funded science misinformers. LOL! It's a pretty 'professional' looking blog isn't it? Fools a lot of lazy gullible people who are just looking to confirm their own bias and won't bother to 'research' further to check the facts.
Tell me, did you actually read those papers?

From their science denying 'position statement'

"there is no compelling reason to believe that the rise in temperature was caused by the rise in CO2. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that future increases in the air's CO2 content will produce any global warming."


Try reading reputable sources like the major reports that summarize ALL the science, or do a search of all the published literature yourself. Not just mindlessly parrot dishonest cherry picking from a science denier blog.
 
Last edited:
Jack Hays said:
The denial is strong in you.
Click to expand...
You copied and pasted from a conspiracy blog with a well known history of lying and cherry picking to misinform lazy gullible people who won't bother to check facts? The delusions are strong in you.

But whats new. Same **** different day.
 
Last edited:
Quaestio said:
You copied and pasted from a conspiracy blog with a well known history of lying and cherry picking to misinform lazy gullible people who won't bother to check facts? The delusions are strong in you.

But whats new. Same **** different day.
Click to expand...

Your acknowledgement of losing, being utterly unable to address the science, is noted.
 
Tim the plumber said:
Your acknowledgement of losing, being utterly unable to address the science, is noted.
Click to expand...

You being utterly unable to address even basic science has been noted. Found out how the 'greenhouse' effect actually works yet? No? :lamo
 
Quaestio said:
You being utterly unable to address even basic science has been noted. Found out how the 'greenhouse' effect actually works yet? No? :lamo
Click to expand...

Well, I explained it, you said it was wrong but cannot actually say why.

You have no clue at all. You know this. Any body reading your posts knows this. Why persist?
 
Tim the plumber said:
Well, I explained it, you said it was wrong but cannot actually say why.

You have no clue at all. You know this. Any body reading your posts knows this. Why persist?
Click to expand...

It's the D-K effect in him.
 
Lord of Planar said:
It's the D-K effect in him.
Click to expand...

I find it utterly remarkable that people who have obviously observed you, Longview, Surface detail etc., discuss in detail the way light interacts with the atmosphere would challenge me to explain it, see that I do understand it, to a basic level, then continue with the attack he clearly is way over his head with.

Just???????????????????????????????????????????
 
Tim the plumber said:

I find it utterly remarkable that people who have obviously observed you, Longview, Surface detail etc., discuss in detail the way light interacts with the atmosphere would challenge me to explain it, see that I do understand it, to a basic level, then continue with the attack he clearly is way over his head with.

Just???????????????????????????????????????????
Click to expand...

They think they know everything, because the prophets of AGW have told them what to believe, and deny all else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom