• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Admin Admits to Global Warming

Threegoofs said:
It’s cute that you think you understand this.
Click to expand...

You think consensus is science?

Many people believe in Christianity. They all agree that Jesus Christ existed, and the He is who He says He is (namely the Son of God). There is consensus. Therefore, according to your definition of 'science', it is proven science.

Many people believe in atheism. They all agree that no god or gods exist. There is consensus. Therefore, according to your definition of 'science', it is proven science.

Paradox.

No, consensus is not used in science. No one votes on a theory of science. There are no elite gatekeepers for any theory of science. No theory of science is ever proven, sanctified, blessed, or otherwise made more legitimate by any consensus at all.
 
Into the Night said:
You think consensus is science?

Many people believe in Christianity. They all agree that Jesus Christ existed, and the He is who He says He is (namely the Son of God). There is consensus. Therefore, according to your definition of 'science', it is proven science.

Many people believe in atheism. They all agree that no god or gods exist. There is consensus. Therefore, according to your definition of 'science', it is proven science.

Paradox.

No, consensus is not used in science. No one votes on a theory of science. There are no elite gatekeepers for any theory of science. No theory of science is ever proven, sanctified, blessed, or otherwise made more legitimate by any consensus at all.
Click to expand...

Again, its cute you think you understand this.

You cant even handle the concept that I say ‘consensus is used often in science’ and conflate it with ‘consensus IS science’.

I mean, for all your nutty prattling about logical fallacies, it seems like you’d be seeing that one pretty clearly.

But... its cute that you think you understand philosophy and logic too, while obviously having no clue about either.

I mean... its so pathetic you have to make a little friend to pretend that someone agrees with you.
 
Threegoofs said:
Again, its cute you think you understand this.

You cant even handle the concept that I say ‘consensus is used often in science’ and conflate it with ‘consensus IS science’.

I mean, for all your nutty prattling about logical fallacies, it seems like you’d be seeing that one pretty clearly.

But... its cute that you think you understand philosophy and logic too, while obviously having no clue about either.

I mean... its so pathetic you have to make a little friend to pretend that someone agrees with you.
Click to expand...
You think consensus is science?

Many people believe in Christianity. They all agree that Jesus Christ existed, and the He is who He says He is (namely the Son of God). There is consensus. Therefore, according to your definition of 'science', it is proven science.

Many people believe in atheism. They all agree that no god or gods exist. There is consensus. Therefore, according to your definition of 'science', it is proven science.

Paradox.

No, consensus is not used in science. No one votes on a theory of science. There are no elite gatekeepers for any theory of science. No theory of science is ever proven, sanctified, blessed, or otherwise made more legitimate by any consensus at all.
 
Into the Night said:
You think consensus is science?

Many people believe in Christianity. They all agree that Jesus Christ existed, and the He is who He says He is (namely the Son of God). There is consensus. Therefore, according to your definition of 'science', it is proven science.

Many people believe in atheism. They all agree that no god or gods exist. There is consensus. Therefore, according to your definition of 'science', it is proven science.

Paradox.

No, consensus is not used in science. No one votes on a theory of science. There are no elite gatekeepers for any theory of science. No theory of science is ever proven, sanctified, blessed, or otherwise made more legitimate by any consensus at all.
Click to expand...

Again.. mr philosophy and logic sees my statement and thinks I think ‘consensus is science’ when I specifically wrote ‘consensus isn’t science’.

There’s definitely a major malfunction in the equipment on this one.
 
Threegoofs said:
Again.. mr philosophy and logic sees my statement and thinks I think ‘consensus is science’ when I specifically wrote ‘consensus isn’t science’.

There’s definitely a major malfunction in the equipment on this one.
Click to expand...

Nah. You're just trying to backpedal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom