• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Next Five Years Will be Hot

Jack Hays said:
It is the basis of a disappointing number of your posts.
Click to expand...

No, it isn't. It's just your go-to accusation when I point out your reliance on a certain website that is known for its anti-science propaganda. As someone who has admitted to being ignorant of science, you would do better to source your data from websites run by actual scientists.
 
Surface Detail said:
No, it isn't. It's just your go-to accusation when I point out your reliance on a certain website that is known for its anti-science propaganda. As someone who has admitted to being ignorant of science, you would do better to source your data from websites run by actual scientists.
Click to expand...

You ignore peer-reviewed papers, often linked in WUWT.
 
Jack Hays said:
Based on a false premise.
Click to expand...

Nope. WUWT is a fake science site, run by a non-scientist, that publishes nonsense articles. It is not a reliable source of information. You really would have to be an idiot to take it seriously. Try reading sites run by actual scientists for information about scientific topics.
 
Surface Detail said:
Nope. WUWT is a fake science site, run by a non-scientist, that publishes nonsense articles. It is not a reliable source of information. You really would have to be an idiot to take it seriously. Try reading sites run by actual scientists for information about scientific topics.
Click to expand...

The false premise was about yourself, not WUWT. I discount your remarks on the latter anyway.
 
The Union of Concerned Scientists has a new report out:

Heat in the Heartland
60 years of warming in the Midwest

Obviously they chose 60 years instead of 70 or 80 or all the way back to the 19th
century because if they did, it would be 70, 80 or 125 years of cooling summers.

They chose several states across the midwest as examples in the report. Here's
what NOAA's Climate at a Glance shows for maximums temperatures May through
October for Missouri, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio:

https://i.postimg.cc/wTwrkvZB/image.png

Minnesota only shows cooling summertime max temps since 1930

Here's a map of what that all looks like:

10er3ps.gif


The Union of Concerned Scientists are publishing propaganda, not science.
 
Steve Case said:
The Union of Concerned Scientists has a new report out:

Heat in the Heartland
60 years of warming in the Midwest

Obviously they chose 60 years instead of 70 or 80 or all the way back to the 19th
century because if they did, it would be 70, 80 or 125 years of cooling summers.

They chose several states across the midwest as examples in the report. Here's
what NOAA's Climate at a Glance shows for maximums temperatures May through
October for Missouri, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio:

https://i.postimg.cc/wTwrkvZB/image.png

Minnesota only shows cooling summertime max temps since 1930

Here's a map of what that all looks like:

10er3ps.gif


The Union of Concerned Scientists are publishing propaganda, not science.
Click to expand...

The title of the report is "EARTH will enter warming period". If you want to cherry pick MAX Temps of Minnesota, ignore warmer MIN Temps, and discount the rest of the globe, be my guest. A look at the warming of the earth --->

World_Temp_Map.jpg
 
Media_Truth said:
The title of the report is "EARTH will enter warming period". If you want to cherry pick MAX Temps of Minnesota, ignore warmer MIN Temps, and discount the rest of the globe, be my guest. A look at the warming of the earth --->

View attachment 67257917
Click to expand...

Well, no. The title of the report is:

Heat in the Heartland: 60 Years of Warming in the Midwest
 
Steve Case said:
The Union of Concerned Scientists has a new report out:

Heat in the Heartland
60 years of warming in the Midwest

Obviously they chose 60 years instead of 70 or 80 or all the way back to the 19th
century because if they did, it would be 70, 80 or 125 years of cooling summers.

They chose several states across the midwest as examples in the report. Here's
what NOAA's Climate at a Glance shows for maximums temperatures May through
October for Missouri, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio:

https://i.postimg.cc/wTwrkvZB/image.png

Minnesota only shows cooling summertime max temps since 1930

Here's a map of what that all looks like:

10er3ps.gif


The Union of Concerned Scientists are publishing propaganda, not science.
Click to expand...

You necro'd a thread for that?
 
Media_Truth said:
The title of the report is "EARTH will enter warming period". If you want to cherry pick MAX Temps of Minnesota, ignore warmer MIN Temps, and discount the rest of the globe, be my guest. A look at the warming of the earth --->

View attachment 67257917
Click to expand...

You posted the worst possible temperature data set that has been heavily adjusted over and over, for over 20 years now.

No link either....

;)
 
Sunsettommy said:
You posted the worst possible temperature data set that has been heavily adjusted over and over, for over 20 years now.

No link either....

;)
Click to expand...

It figures that you wouldn't have seen the NASA Interactive Climate Change map. Take a look. Maybe you'll learn something...

Interactive: Climate time machine – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

This color-coded map shows a progression of changing global surface temperatures since 1884. Dark blue indicates areas cooler than average. Dark red indicates areas warmer than average.

Data source: NASA/GISS
Credit: NASA Scientific Visualization Studio
 
Media_Truth said:
It figures that you wouldn't have seen the NASA Interactive Climate Change map. Take a look. Maybe you'll learn something...

Interactive: Climate time machine – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

This color-coded map shows a progression of changing global surface temperatures since 1884. Dark blue indicates areas cooler than average. Dark red indicates areas warmer than average.

Data source: NASA/GISS
Credit: NASA Scientific Visualization Studio
Click to expand...

:lol:

You didn't address my statement at all, just a deflection to another NASA link.

It is clear you refuse to acknowledge the possibility of fudged temperature charts, it has been exposed for years on the internet, and you still don't know about it?

Snicker...……..
 
calamity said:
You necro'd a thread for that?
Click to expand...

I have to live with the world and the internet the way it is.
Forums like this one have way too many threads, it's just
too darn much to follow. So I looked for an old thread that
more or less was a match.
 
Media_Truth said:
The title of the report is "EARTH will enter warming period". If you want to cherry pick MAX Temps of Minnesota, ignore warmer MIN Temps, and discount the rest of the globe ...
Click to expand...

The United States isn't the globe, but it spans North America with
a good variety of geography and topography which makes it a good
sub-set of a land mass. World-wide, the US has the best sampling
of weather data of any significant land surface. If the US does not
show warming, a strong explanation is needed as to why it is an
outlier compared to the rest of the world as a whole.

Besides that, a whole lot of people live in the US east of the Rockies
and they are being systematically lied to by the climate lobby. That
summers aren't hotter than they were in the '30s and that more
CO2 really is beneficial for agriculture isn't being pointed out by
our one-sided media.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom